LG QNED75B

LG QNED75B Feature Scores

Explore all 99 feature scores for LG QNED75B, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

99 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    11 (11%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    32 (32%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    23 (23%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    17 (17%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    16 (16%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    upscaling quality: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    DVDs and 1080p sources are enlarged cleanly, avoiding obvious jagged edges and harsh sharpening.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    color accuracy: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Colors look natural to several viewers, especially skin tones, although lab testing finds some default white-balance and color-mapping inconsistencies.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    app selection: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Most major streaming apps are represented, though one owner misses a specific TV-provider app.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    image processing: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Good compression cleanup and HD conversion help ordinary video, although some fine detail can be sacrificed.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    picture mode tuning: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Standard, Cinema, Filmmaker and custom motion settings allow useful tradeoffs between brightness, accuracy, and smoothness.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    maximum volume: 4.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Volume impressions vary: some owners find it surprisingly loud, while testing shows the speakers have limited headroom in noisier rooms.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    art display mode: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Gallery mode can show artwork as room decor, with some free selections and optional paid content.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    overall image accuracy: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    HDR tracking and tuned picture modes can be impressively accurate, even though the panel cannot deliver strong HDR contrast.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    resolution: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The 4K panel shows native UHD material clearly and accepts standard resolutions, but it tops out at 60Hz.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    calibration options: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    A full calibration can make the image exceptionally accurate, and the settings offer useful adjustments rather than a universal one-size-fits-all recipe.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    input lag: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Game Mode offers low input delay, with one hands-on test reporting about 9ms, so controller actions feel responsive.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    picture quality: 3.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Colorful, sharp 4K content can look pleasing, particularly in favorable lighting, but washed-out blacks and low brightness keep the image from looking truly impressive.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    audio settings: 5.0, 1 review
    Audio customization includes voice enhancement, speaker routing and other adjustments to match the room.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    banding control: 5.0, 1 review
    Near-black scenes are surprisingly clean, with minimal visible vertical banding.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    burn-in resistance: 5.0, 1 review
    The direct-lit LCD panel has very low expected permanent burn-in risk even with static on-screen elements.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Image scaling: 5.0, 1 review
    Low-resolution video scales without conspicuous oversharpening, making old discs easier to watch.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    PC text clarity: 5.0, 1 review
    Proper 4:4:4 chroma and an RGB layout keep computer text crisp.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Picture detail: 5.0, 1 review
    Fine 4K detail and converted HD edges can look impressively crisp for a budget set.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    smart home integration: 5.0, 1 review
    Apple, Google and Alexa-related functions make the TV convenient for mixed-device households.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 3.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The low price and vibrant everyday picture attract budget buyers, although similarly priced competitors offer better contrast and brightness.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    auto low-latency mode: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    ALLM automatically engages the low-lag picture mode when compatible games start.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    bezel size: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Slim borders help the screen blend into living-room and bedroom decor.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Free streaming channels: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Built-in free LG channels offer a no-additional-subscription way to find casual TV content.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    gaming mode quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Game Optimizer reduces input delay and makes gaming controls easily accessible.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Thin bezels give the TV a tidy face, although the rear plastic and overall finish look basic.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Smart TV platform: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    webOS provides profiles, streaming choices, and free content, but some find its busy layout and sluggish behavior frustrating.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    accessory compatibility: 4.0, 1 review
    An upgraded LG Magic Remote is available separately for buyers who prefer pointer-based controls.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    AirPlay support: 4.0, 1 review
    Apple devices can share or mirror media directly to the TV over AirPlay.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    app performance: 4.0, 1 review
    Apps can launch quickly, but webOS navigation may still feel sluggish when moving through menus.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    audio passthrough: 4.0, 1 review
    eARC can deliver high-quality, uncompressed audio to a soundbar or home-theater receiver.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    cable management: 4.0, 1 review
    Simple clips help keep attached cables tidy.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    dialogue clarity: 4.0, 1 review
    Speech is serviceable, with voice-enhancement options, but the speakers lack some treble definition.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    eARC support: 4.0, 1 review
    An eARC connection makes it straightforward to pair the TV with a capable external audio system.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    noise reduction: 4.0, 1 review
    Compression blocking from low-quality streaming sources is cleaned up well, though fine texture can become slightly waxy.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    power cord design: 4.0, 1 review
    The right-angle power connector is a small but appreciated convenience.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    reliability: 4.0, 1 review
    The direct-lit LCD design avoids several common panel-degradation risks, although an LED failure could affect a large portion of the screen.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    screen mirroring: 4.0, 1 review
    AirPlay lets iPhone users mirror their display to the larger screen.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    size options: 4.0, 1 review
    The many available sizes make it easier to fit the TV into a bedroom, living room, or secondary space.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    software updates: 4.0, 1 review
    LG’s Re:New program promises additional webOS versions over several years, extending access to newer interface features.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    streaming app support: 4.0, 1 review
    Netflix, YouTube and other familiar streaming services are easy to find within webOS.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    gaming dashboard: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Game Bar and Game Optimizer provide easy access to low-lag settings and VRR controls.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    HDR tone mapping accuracy: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Midtones track well, though particular picture-processing settings materially affect HDR accuracy.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    tone mapping: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Dynamic processing preserves some highlight details but cannot overcome the display’s inherently limited peak brightness.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    high-refresh-rate gaming: 1.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A hard 60Hz ceiling rules out the native 4K/120fps experience sought by competitive gamers.
  • 1.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    HDR brightness: 1.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    HDR highlights remain restrained and bright outdoor scenes can look flat; simply enabling HDR makes only a modest difference.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    advertising intrusiveness: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Promotions can appear in the interface and on idle screens, with no simple universal way to disable them.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    reflection handling: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The screen can reflect windows almost like a mirror, so placement away from bright light sources is important.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    shadow detail: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Dark scenes can obscure subtle details, leaving shadowed subjects harder to distinguish.
  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    4K at 120 Hz support: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    This TV cannot display native 4K at 120Hz, which limits premium console and PC gaming.
  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    glare resistance: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Direct lights and windows remain highly visible on the glossy screen, undermining daytime viewing.
  • 1.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    HDR performance: 1.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    HDR content lacks the punch and contrast expected from the format, though some viewers notice a slight improvement over SDR in controlled lighting.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    peak brightness: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Neither SDR nor HDR gets particularly bright, limiting its ability to overcome glare or make highlights stand out.
  • 2.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    black levels: 2.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Dark scenes often appear gray or hazy rather than genuinely black, although some viewers perceive deeper blacks in brighter images.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    dirty screen effect: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Sports and uniform backgrounds can reveal mild-to-noticeable blotches, particularly toward the edges.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The native 60Hz panel is adequate for standard video and gaming, not the smoother 120Hz experience of more capable models.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    screen uniformity: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Patchy gray fields and darker sides can stand out, especially in broad, even-color scenes.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    dark-room performance: 1.0, 1 review
    A dark room exposes the panel’s gray blacks and low contrast, making this a weak pick for movie nights without ambient light.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    daytime viewing performance: 1.0, 1 review
    The TV struggles against daylight and nearby lamps because its screen output is low and direct reflections remain distracting.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    DTS support: 1.0, 1 review
    DTS playback and passthrough support is absent, which matters for certain Blu-ray and disc-based soundtracks.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    flicker control: 1.0, 1 review
    Persistent low-frequency backlight flicker is a concern for viewers prone to eye strain or headaches.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    HDR highlight detail: 1.0, 1 review
    Fine bright highlights lack visual sparkle; the sun or reflections can disappear into an underwhelming overall image.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    local dimming performance: 1.0, 1 review
    The screen lacks effective zone-by-zone backlight control, so dark scenes wash out even though severe zone-related halos are not a problem.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    Mini LED marketing clarity: 1.0, 1 review
    The Mini LED branding may mislead shoppers because the backlight lacks local dimming control.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    operating system speed: 1.0, 1 review
    One hands-on test finds the operating system frustratingly slow to respond.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    response time: 1.0, 1 review
    Slow pixel transitions leave moving subjects blurry rather than sharply resolved.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    VRR range: 1.0, 1 review
    The limited VRR range lacks low-frame-rate compensation, so tearing can return below 48fps.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    remote responsiveness: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some button presses and menu movements lag behind the user’s input.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    bass performance: 2.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Bass is usually thin and lacks cinematic weight, so a soundbar is a better option for action films.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    motion interpolation: 2.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    TruMotion can smooth camera movement but may introduce a soap-opera look or inconsistent frame pacing.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    contrast ratio: 2.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Black depth is a major divide: colorful scenes look contrasty to some, but very dark scenes turn gray and flat.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    color gamut: 2.0, 1 review
    HDR color coverage does not reach the full range of modern HDR formats, so some vibrant tones cannot be reproduced.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    display technology: 2.0, 1 review
    The Mini LED label does not bring the high-contrast local dimming buyers may expect from premium Mini LED sets.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Input accessibility: 2.0, 1 review
    Inputs on the rear can be awkward to reach once installed, although another unit’s unboxing describes a more accessible port layout.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    remote layout: 2.0, 1 review
    Physical buttons are welcome, but close positioning of Home and navigation keys can cause accidental presses.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    setup ease: 2.0, 1 review
    Initial software setup is manageable, but stand assembly can be fiddly on at least one demonstrated unit.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    stand width: 2.0, 1 review
    Widely spaced feet need a broad TV cabinet, with no narrower mounting position.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    variable refresh rate: 2.0, 1 review
    VRR exists and can tame tearing within its supported range, but it stops helping when frame rates dip too low.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Black uniformity: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Black areas often look uneven or gray, sometimes with warmer patches and darker edges.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    menu responsiveness: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some navigation is fluid, but other use reports describe noticeable delays, especially with the included remote.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    motion clarity: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Fast subjects can blur noticeably in tests, even though some owners consider sports and 60fps games crisp.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    judder handling: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Some 24fps material judders, although film playback from native apps or suitable sources fares better.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    motion handling: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Judder and blur make motion a mixed point: viewers of 60fps content are more satisfied than those watching 24fps films or fast games.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    viewing angles: 2.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Side viewing is inconsistent: the picture can remain accurate at modest angles, but colors and fine detail deteriorate farther off-center.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    sound quality: 2.8, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Built-in sound draws mixed reactions: some owners find it plenty powerful for everyday television, while testing highlights thin bass and limited richness.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    build quality: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The TV has no obvious assembly defects, but flexible plastic panels and a plain rear give it a budget feel.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ease of use: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The basic smart-TV functions are approachable, while the fuller webOS menus can feel cluttered and overwhelming.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Remote control usability: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Physical buttons simplify basic actions, although pointer navigation or unusual key placement takes adjustment.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    stand quality: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Assembly impressions differ, ranging from easy-to-lock feet to frustratingly aligned stand screws.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    HDMI port count: 3.0, 1 review
    Three HDMI inputs are enough for a modest setup but can feel restrictive alongside multiple consoles and audio gear.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    USB port count: 3.0, 1 review
    A single USB connection limits simultaneously attached accessories and drives.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Video input versatility: 3.0, 1 review
    Three HDMI inputs and one USB connection cover simple arrangements, but larger setups may require a switch.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    white balance accuracy: 3.0, 1 review
    Default grayscale can skew warm or blue depending on brightness. Fine calibration needs to be tailored to the individual panel.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    gaming performance: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Casual 60fps sessions can feel responsive, but pronounced motion blur can spoil faster gameplay.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    low-resolution content handling: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    HD streaming and older sources generally look tidy after processing, but extremely low-resolution material can remain soft.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    overall satisfaction: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    A straightforward, lower-cost 4K TV gets enthusiastic endorsements for basic use, but its dark-scene picture quality and motion fall well behind stronger competitors.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    4K gaming support: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Conventional 4K 60fps games work, but higher-frame-rate 4K output is not available.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    blooming control: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A faint glow or haze can appear in dark scenes, though the absence of actual dimming zones avoids the more obvious halos seen on some TVs.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    color volume: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Colors are lively enough for ordinary material, but deeply saturated HDR shades and very bright colors are harder for the panel to reproduce.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    remote control quality: 3.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    A traditional button-heavy remote is appreciated by some, but the optional Magic Remote and occasional navigation delays divide opinion.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Bedroom viewing: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A bedroom is one of the best matches: limited ambient light and modest viewing needs play to this model’s strengths.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Home theater with soundbar: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    External speakers are advisable for cinematic bass and immersion, and the TV offers useful soundbar connections.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    1080p content watching: 5.0, 1 review
    Full-HD material upscales cleanly and looks notably better than very low-resolution sources.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Watching DVDs: 5.0, 1 review
    Older DVDs look cleaner after upscaling than their original resolution suggests, with little obvious edge harshness.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Children’s-room viewing: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    It offers affordable streaming and regular TV for a child’s room without the price of advanced gaming hardware.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Garage viewing: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The affordable screen is a practical choice for basic garage entertainment when lighting can be controlled.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Console gaming: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Standard 60fps console play can be enjoyable, but buyers wanting native 4K/120Hz should look elsewhere.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Apple ecosystem households: 4.0, 1 review
    AirPlay and Apple home features make the TV convenient for an iPhone or iPad household.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Desktop productivity: 4.0, 1 review
    The panel can display legible PC text, making a simple large-screen computer setup practical.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Long-term ownership: 4.0, 1 review
    Low burn-in risk and expected brightness stability favor long-term everyday viewing, although an LED failure could affect a large part of the backlight.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Moderately lit-room viewing: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A room with gentle, controlled lighting balances the TV’s poor dark contrast against its limited brightness.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Bright-room viewing
    1.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Bright-room viewing: 1.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Low screen brightness and mirror-like reflections make sunny or window-filled rooms a poor match.
  • Low-distraction use
    1.0
    1 review
    Low-distraction use: 1.0, 1 review
    Unavoidable on-screen ads and promotion panels make this a distracting choice for anyone wanting a clean TV interface.
  • PC gaming
    1.0
    1 review
    PC gaming: 1.0, 1 review
    PC games can run at 4K/60Hz, but the panel cannot match the 120Hz-and-above performance that demanding PC players expect.
  • Photosensitive players
    1.0
    1 review
    Photosensitive players: 1.0, 1 review
    The constant backlight flicker makes prolonged play a poor match for people sensitive to flashing or eye strain.
  • Everyday living-room viewing
    2.8
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Everyday living-room viewing: 2.8, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Routine viewing works in modestly lit spaces, but a bright family room or premium centerpiece setup is a less convincing fit.
  • Shared-screen viewing
    3.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Shared-screen viewing: 3.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Wide sofas are a conditional fit: one evaluation favors the off-axis performance, but others find noticeable image degradation from the sides.
  • Sports watching
    3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Sports watching: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sports look sharp enough to some viewers, while others may notice blur and patchy gray fields during motion.
  • Streaming movies and shows
    3.0
    1 review
    Streaming movies and shows: 3.0, 1 review
    The large app library and strong cleanup of compressed streams suit routine streaming, provided picture-quality expectations stay modest.
  • Budget-conscious buyers
    3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    This is a low-cost way into 4K streaming, but shoppers should compare alternatives that deliver stronger picture quality for similar money.
  • Movie watching
    3.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Movie watching: 3.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Colorful 4K movies can look pleasing in controlled light, but weak HDR, raised blacks, and judder reduce cinematic impact.