Best TVs for app selection

app selection Decision Dashboard

Best for app selection

TCL QM8L

5.0 attribute score

Highest scored product for this attribute based on supporting review evidence.

Safest pick

Sony Bravia 7 II

4.9 attribute score

Balances the attribute score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.

Most evidence

LG StanByMe 2

10 supporting reviews

Has the broadest review evidence for this attribute.

Best overall product

Samsung S90H

4.5 overall score

Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this attribute.

#1 LG G6
5.0

webOS offers an excellent app catalog covering major streaming services plus niche platforms such as Crunchyroll and Hidive.

Pros: picture quality, peak brightness

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#2 TCL QM8L
5.0

Major streaming services are well covered, giving the built-in platform nearly everything most households need.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, judder handling

#3 TCL QM7L
5.0

Google TV provides nearly every major streaming app along with multiple free and live-TV options.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: color accuracy, viewing angles

#4 Sony Bravia 9 II
5.0

App availability is excellent, with the major streaming services covered and few meaningful gaps.

Pros: overall satisfaction, overall image accuracy

Cons: value for money, bass performance

#5 Sony Bravia 7 II
4.9

Google TV offers an exceptionally broad app catalog, with the major streaming services and plenty of downloadable options covered.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#6 Hisense U75QG
4.8

App availability is broad, with Google TV offering the major streaming services plus many niche options.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#7 LG C6
4.7

Most major streaming and catch-up services are available, although regional omissions such as Discovery+ or Freely may matter to some buyers.

Pros: picture quality, gaming performance

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#8 Hisense U65QF
4.6

App selection is a consistent strength, with major streaming services covered and some reviewers unable to identify any important missing app.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#9 Roku Pro Series (2025)
4.5

Most major streaming apps are easy to find and use, though Twitch is missing and one owner could not install a desired karaoke app.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, portability and versatility

#10 Roku Pro Series (2026)
4.5

A broad collection of streaming services and free programming gives viewers plenty to watch. Twitch is the notable exception in the tested platform coverage.

Pros: contrast ratio, value for money

Cons: peak brightness, HDR brightness

#11 LG B6
4.5

The app catalog covers nearly everything most viewers are likely to need.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, daytime viewing performance

#12 Sony Bravia 8 II
4.4

The Google TV app catalog is a major strength, with no significant omissions and strong support for major services and UK catch-up apps.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#13 Amazon Ember QLED TV
3.9

The app library is generally broad, with major streaming services well covered. A few missing or problematic services, especially Zoom and Spectrum for specific users, create notable exceptions.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, reliability

#14 Samsung S90H
3.0

Major apps are broadly covered, though regional gaps such as iPlayer at review time keep the selection from being flawless.

Pros: glare resistance, black levels

Cons: Dolby Vision support, color gamut

#15 LG StanByMe 2
2.0

App selection is one of the most repeated complaints. Major streaming services are usually present, but reviewers repeatedly miss apps available on Roku, Android, Google TV, or other platforms.

Pros: overall satisfaction, portability and versatility

Cons: value for money, menu responsiveness