Best TVs for motion interpolation

motion interpolation Decision Dashboard

Best for motion interpolation

LG C6

4.7 attribute score

Highest scored product for this attribute based on supporting review evidence.

Safest pick

LG B6

4.6 attribute score

Balances the attribute score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.

Most evidence

Sony Bravia 8 II

6 supporting reviews

Has the broadest review evidence for this attribute.

Best overall product

Samsung S90H

4.5 overall score

Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this attribute.

#1 LG C6
4.7

Cinematic Movement is effective at smoothing pans while preserving a natural film look. Stronger processing is rarely necessary.

Pros: picture quality, gaming performance

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#2 LG B6
4.6

LG’s motion interpolation works well when used selectively, reducing film judder without needing the strongest settings.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, daytime viewing performance

#3 TCL QM8L
4.0

Low interpolation settings can smooth motion without immediately creating a soap-opera effect. Pushing the controls higher introduces more artificial-looking movement and artifacts.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, judder handling

#4 Sony Bravia 8 II
3.9

Sony’s interpolation is unusually subtle, smoothing pans while preserving a cinematic look better than many aggressive motion systems.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#5 LG G6
3.8

Cinematic Movement can add useful smoothness without obvious artifacts, while stronger settings may hesitate or create an artificial look.

Pros: picture quality, peak brightness

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#6 TCL QM7L
3.6

Low settings can smooth film without an obvious soap-opera look, but stronger processing introduces artifacts, excessive smoothness, or a darker image.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: color accuracy, viewing angles

#7 Sony Bravia 7 II
3.5

Sony’s interpolation can look exceptionally polished when tuned well, but the default processing can also introduce glitches or brief blur in difficult scenes.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#8 Hisense U65QF
3.3

Motion interpolation is highly adjustable, which some viewers will appreciate. One reviewer strongly dislikes the default soap-opera effect, while another praises the flexibility to tune judder and smoothness.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#9 Roku Pro Series (2025)
3.3

Motion smoothing is divisive: some viewers grow to like the ultra-smooth look, while others find even the lowest setting too aggressive and soap-opera-like.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, portability and versatility

#10 Samsung S90H
2.5

Interpolation is useful when kept moderate, but stronger or automatic settings can introduce obvious soap-opera effect and unnatural motion.

Pros: glare resistance, black levels

Cons: Dolby Vision support, color gamut

#11 Roku Pro Series (2026)
2.5

Motion interpolation introduces visible issues even at a low setting, limiting its usefulness for smoothing movement.

Pros: contrast ratio, value for money

Cons: peak brightness, HDR brightness

#12 Hisense U75QG
2.3

Motion interpolation can smooth video, but stronger settings may introduce artifacts, skipped frames, or an artificial look that some reviewers disliked intensely.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#13 Sony Bravia 9 II
2.0

Cinema Motion can create an artificial soap-opera or uncanny effect, so disabling it may produce a more natural film presentation.

Pros: overall satisfaction, overall image accuracy

Cons: value for money, bass performance

#14 Amazon Ember QLED TV
1.5

Default smoothing can look overly processed, floaty, or soap-opera-like. Reducing the setting helps, but reviewers still find motion compromised.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, reliability