Best 2026 TVs for response time

#1 LG G6
5.0

OLED pixel response is nearly instantaneous, producing crisp motion and exceptionally responsive gaming.

Pros: picture quality, peak brightness

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#2 LG C6H OLED
5.0

Nearly instantaneous pixel transitions minimize trailing and keep fast games remarkably clear.

Pros: gaming performance, HDR brightness

Cons: reflection handling, glare resistance

#3 Samsung S85H OLED
5.0

OLED pixels transition almost instantly, leaving fast objects with very little trailing blur. Minor overshoot is generally hard to see.

Pros: black levels, picture quality

Cons: glare resistance, reflection handling

#4 Samsung S95H OLED
5.0

Nearly instantaneous pixel response keeps fast-moving game objects sharp with minimal trailing.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: design and appearance, Dolby Vision support

#5 LG B6 OLED 2026
5.0

Fast OLED pixel transitions keep rapid movements crisp, giving games an immediate, blur-free feel.

Pros: value for money, peak brightness

Cons: color accuracy, stand quality

#6 LG B6E OLED
5.0

OLED pixel transitions are nearly instantaneous, keeping fast game movement exceptionally crisp.

Pros: contrast ratio, black levels

Cons: reflection handling, color accuracy

#7 LG C6
5.0

Near-instant OLED response keeps gaming motion exceptionally clean and responsive, though it can make low-frame-rate stutter more visible.

Pros: picture quality, gaming performance

Cons: value for money, sound quality

#8 Roku Pro Series (2026)
5.0

Fast OLED response makes moving targets easier to follow than on the mini-LED alternatives discussed in testing.

Pros: contrast ratio, value for money

Cons: peak brightness, HDR brightness

#9 Samsung 77S90H OLED
5.0

Almost instantaneous pixel changes sharply reduce the blur behind moving objects.

Pros: black levels, contrast ratio

Cons: Dolby Vision support, stutter handling

#10 Samsung S90H
5.0

Pixel response is extremely fast, giving fast-paced games an immediate, clean feel with little blur.

Pros: glare resistance, black levels

Cons: Dolby Vision support, color gamut

#11 Sony BRAVIA 6 OLED
5.0

OLED pixels change almost instantly, preventing noticeable trails behind fast-moving objects. This helps both games and sports.

Pros: HDMI 2.1 port count, Video input versatility

Cons: value for money, overall satisfaction

#12 Samsung R95H
4.0

The screen responds quickly enough for enjoyable gaming, with clear improvements after firmware changes. Dark transitions still show more trailing than bright ones.

Pros: color volume, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, color accuracy

#13 TCL RM9L
3.5

Motion response is generally respectable, but transitions between dark and bright shades can be slow enough to create light trails.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: color crosstalk, value for money

#14 Sony BRAVIA 3 II
3.3

120Hz motion is usable but shows some pixel-transition overshoot; at 60Hz motion is substantially blurrier. Other evaluations of gaming response are more upbeat.

Pros: HDMI 2.1 port count, overall satisfaction

Cons: HDR performance, bass performance

#15 TCL QM7L
2.8

Pixel response ranges from very good for Mini-LED to extremely slow in fast games. Buyers sensitive to trailing or smearing should treat this as a major concern.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: color accuracy, viewing angles

#16 Hisense U6SF
2.8

Pixel-response assessments conflict: some measured transitions appear adequate, while others show long smearing trails that reduce clarity during fast action.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: bass performance, HDR brightness

#17 Samsung R85H
2.4

Fast-moving objects can leave long blur trails, particularly at 60Hz; 120Hz helps somewhat without entirely fixing it.

Pros: overall satisfaction, color gamut

Cons: value for money, local dimming performance

#18 Hisense U7SG
2.3

Pixel transitions are slower than the refresh-rate label suggests, leaving dark smearing and blur in fast scenes.

Pros: overall satisfaction, glare resistance

Cons: motion handling, viewing angles

#19 TCL QM7L Pro
2.0

Slow pixel changes smear action even at 120Hz and 144Hz, undermining motion clarity despite the low input lag.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: viewing angles, motion clarity

#20 Samsung QN80H
2.0

Pixel transitions are slow in darker scenes, leaving blurred trails especially around 60Hz motion.

Pros: picture quality, contrast ratio

Cons: blooming control, glare resistance

#21 Sony Bravia 7 II
2.0

Pixel transitions in Game Mode can be slow enough to create visible motion blur in fast titles, despite otherwise low input lag.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#22 Hisense UR9SG
1.8

Pixel transitions are much slower than OLED, creating visible smear at both high and lower refresh rates.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: value for money, color accuracy

#23 Samsung M80H
1.5

Slow pixel changes cause visible smearing that undercuts its high-refresh capabilities.

Pros: gaming performance, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, overall satisfaction

#24 Samsung U8000H
1.5

Slow pixel changes blur moving detail and contribute to weak sports and gaming performance.

Pros: white balance accuracy, design and appearance

Cons: overall satisfaction, value for money

#25 TCL M8LF
1.5

Slow pixel transitions cause pronounced blur and occasional edge artifacts around moving objects.

Pros: value for money, overall satisfaction

Cons: HDR brightness

#26 Vizio Mini LED Quantum 4K
1.5

Slow pixel changes leave fast-moving objects conspicuously blurry, with little inverse ghosting to compensate.

Pros: value for money, picture quality

Cons: account requirements, gaming performance

#27 Hisense U6SF Pro
1.3

Pixel transitions are unusually slow, producing ghosting and blur that faster OLED and gaming monitor panels avoid.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: Smart TV platform, advertising intrusiveness

#28 TCL X11L
1.3

Pixel transitions are slower than OLED, causing blur in fast action; low latency does not entirely solve that limitation.

Pros: peak brightness, blooming control

Cons: value for money, motion clarity

#29 Amazon Ember Artline 2026
1.0

Slow pixel transitions cause pronounced motion smearing, even when the content itself is relatively sharp.

Pros: art display mode, picture quality

Cons: contrast ratio, high-refresh-rate gaming

#30 Hisense CanvasTV 2026
1.0

Pixel transitions are unusually slow in demanding tests, producing blur and soft edges, despite much better impressions from some casual viewing.

Pros: picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: HDR performance, sound quality

#31 LG Gallery 2026
1.0

Slow pixel changes cause visible blur and uneven transitions during fast action, making this one of the set's weaker technical areas.

Pros: design and appearance, maximum volume

Cons: picture quality, value for money

#32 LG MRGB95B
1.0

Slow LCD pixel transitions create obvious motion smearing, particularly at 120Hz and 165Hz.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: value for money, viewing angles

#33 LG QNED75B
1.0

Slow pixel transitions leave moving subjects blurry rather than sharply resolved.

Pros: picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: remote control quality, black levels

#34 Samsung M70H
1.0

Slow, uneven pixel transitions leave moving objects blurry and hard to distinguish.

Pros: sound quality, picture quality

Cons: value for money, local dimming performance

#35 Samsung QN70H
1.0

Very slow pixel transitions make fast movement visibly blurry even with low input lag.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, black levels

#36 Samsung The Frame 2026
1.0

Cinematic movement is surprisingly blurry, and dark transitions are slower than the high refresh-rate specification suggests.

Pros: art display mode, design and appearance

Cons: overall satisfaction, HDMI port accessibility

#37 Samsung The Frame Pro 2026
1.0

Slow pixel changes cause visible blur in both video and games.

Pros: cable management, design and appearance

Cons: value for money, Dolby Vision support

#38 Sony Bravia 9 II
1.0

One test found unusually poor pixel response and backlight speed at high refresh rates, a serious weakness for demanding gaming.

Pros: overall satisfaction, overall image accuracy

Cons: value for money, bass performance

#39 TCL QM8L
1.0

Pixel response is relatively slow for a premium gaming display, producing more blur than OLEDs and stronger gaming-focused competitors.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, judder handling