LG 24GS65F-B

LG 24GS65F-B Feature Scores

Explore all 65 feature scores for LG 24GS65F-B, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

65 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    10 (15%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    27 (42%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    15 (23%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    adaptive sync performance: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    FreeSync and G-SYNC compatibility keep gameplay smooth when frame rates vary. Testing also found little visible flicker during adaptive refresh.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    stand adjustability: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Height adjustment, tilt, and portrait rotation are exceptional conveniences for an inexpensive gaming monitor. The stand gives much more flexibility than tilt-only rivals.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    A 180Hz refresh rate makes camera movement, aiming, and scrolling noticeably smoother than ordinary 60Hz screens. Faster 240Hz and 280Hz alternatives exist.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    input lag: 4.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Low-to-moderate input lag makes control responses feel quick, particularly in PC games. It performs well for the price without leading the fastest segment.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    VRR flicker: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Variable-refresh testing found almost no noticeable flicker, even when frame rates changed markedly.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Color calibration controls: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB controls and an ICC profile can correct the oversaturated factory image to a much more accurate SDR picture. Getting there requires adjustment.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    PC gaming compatibility: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    1080p PC gaming is the sweet spot: a high refresh rate, variable sync, and responsive controls provide a solid experience at modest cost.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    response time: 3.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Pixel response remains consistent across refresh rates, and a moderate overdrive setting performs well. Some motion blur remains, and the maximum setting creates visible artifacts.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    reflection handling: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The matte surface does a good job dispersing indoor lighting and reflections, although a very bright window can still defeat the display.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ease of use: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Simple controls, automated input changes, and desktop adjustment software make the monitor straightforward to use day to day.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    viewing angles: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The IPS image holds up well when viewed from an angle. That helps when the screen is rotated or used off-center.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    VRR compatibility: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Support for both major graphics-card VRR ecosystems makes synchronization flexible. Its stable operation reduces tearing even as frame rates fluctuate.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    brightness: 3.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The panel is bright enough for most indoor desks, with one test finding stronger-than-average SDR output. Direct sunlight can still overpower it.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 3.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast refresh, low input lag, and usable motion tuning make this a capable affordable esports screen. Higher-refresh rivals are better for the most demanding competitive players.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 3.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Its 180Hz IPS panel and adjustable stand make a convincing inexpensive package. Value becomes less compelling when its price approaches faster competitors.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    design and aesthetics: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Thin bezels and restrained black styling keep the display unobtrusive on a desk. The rear-facing port arrangement also appeals to one hands-on tester.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Desk footprint: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The small screen works well on a compact study or gaming desk, with adjustable positioning adding practical flexibility.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    eye comfort features: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reader Mode and flicker-reduction options add comfort-oriented choices for long gaming and study sessions.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    setup ease: 5.0, 1 review
    Assembly is simple: attach the stand, connect power, and plug in a video cable. There is little setup friction.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    black equalizer performance: 3.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Black Stabilizer makes opponents in shadows easier to see without an overly aggressive effect. The tradeoff is grayer blacks and weaker contrast.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    on-screen display usability: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The menu is easy to navigate, and shortcut access makes preferred settings convenient. Getting a useful SDR preset takes only a few adjustments.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    VESA mount compatibility: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A standard 100×100mm VESA mount makes the monitor easy to pair with an arm or wall bracket.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    gaming image presets: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Several game presets and overlays are available, but the default Game 1 mode is generally the safest for faithful colors. FPS-oriented modes can sacrifice accuracy for brighter shadows.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    DisplayPort connectivity: 4.5, 1 review
    DisplayPort can deliver the full 1080p high-refresh signal and is the preferred connection for a gaming PC.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    panel type: 4.5, 1 review
    The IPS panel offers pleasing viewing angles and responsive gaming, although its native contrast is modest.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    screen uniformity: 4.5, 1 review
    Color and brightness remain fairly even across the panel, with only small corner variations in one detailed test.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Stand stability: 4.5, 1 review
    The substantial stand base holds the panel firmly in place despite its adjustable height and orientation.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    GPU demands: 3.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    1080p takes less GPU power and video bandwidth than 1440p, which helps reach high refresh rates. The full benefit still requires sufficiently high game frame rates.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Included accessories: 4.0, 1 review
    The included HDMI and DisplayPort cables can simplify initial setup, though package listings differ by retailer.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Power efficiency: 4.0, 1 review
    An energy-saving function is a useful modest convenience for keeping everyday consumption in check.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    screen size: 4.0, 1 review
    The compact 24-inch class fits gaming and study desks without demanding the room of a larger display.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    software support: 4.0, 1 review
    Desktop control software allows picture adjustments without reaching for the monitor buttons, a useful everyday convenience.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Text fringing: 4.0, 1 review
    A conventional RGB subpixel layout delivers clean, readable text rather than the fringing associated with some unusual panel layouts.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cable management: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A stand cable clip helps tidy wires, although the external power adapter adds another brick to manage.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Gamma tracking: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Factory gamma is inconsistent in one detailed test; selecting the recommended mode and calibrating can bring SDR tracking nearer the standard.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    Device compatibility: 3.5, 1 review
    A gaming PC and a second HDMI device can coexist on the two video inputs. That basic compatibility is offset by the lack of modern docking ports.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    HDR adjustment controls: 3.5, 1 review
    HDR brightness can be changed manually, but adjustment cannot overcome the panel’s modest HDR range.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    HDR performance: 1.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    HDR support adds little real impact: modest brightness, poor blacks, and no local dimming prevent dramatic highlights. SDR is the better-looking mode.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Backlight strobing: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    No backlight strobing option is provided, so it cannot use that technique to sharpen fast motion. Faster alternatives offer it.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    USB hub functionality: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    There is no USB hub, so keyboard, mouse, and other peripherals need connections elsewhere. Rivals offer more convenience here.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    HDR highlight detail: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    HDR brightness barely rises over SDR, so highlights never gain the punch expected of true HDR.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    local dimming performance: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    There is no useful local dimming to boost contrast or create strong HDR highlights. That leaves dark HDR scenes looking flat.
  • 2.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    contrast: 2.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Native IPS contrast is weak, leaving dark scenes washed out. Black Stabilizer can reveal targets but further reduces image depth.
  • 2.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    port selection: 2.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    One HDMI, one DisplayPort, and a headphone jack cover basic gaming. Missing USB-C and USB ports reduce versatility.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    black levels: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Black levels lack depth, and IPS glow is noticeable in darkness. Raising shadow detail with the game controls can make blacks look even grayer.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    console gaming compatibility: 2.5, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The monitor can accept common 1080p console signals, including 120Hz, but lacks some console-oriented VRR and ALLM behavior. It is a better choice for PC-only than console-only gaming.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    backlight bleed control: 1.5, 1 review
    One tested panel showed obvious backlight bleed and pronounced IPS glow, especially in dark scenes. Individual units may vary.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    USB-C power delivery: 1.5, 1 review
    The absence of USB-C input also rules out power delivery, leaving laptop charging to a separate adapter.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    overall picture quality: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Basic SDR gaming looks serviceable, but weak contrast and disappointing HDR prevent the picture from feeling premium.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    built-in speakers: 2.0, 1 review
    No built-in speakers means audio requires headphones or external speakers.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HDMI 2.1 support: 2.0, 1 review
    The absence of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth limits its usefulness for buyers seeking premium console connections.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HDR tone mapping accuracy: 2.0, 1 review
    HDR tone mapping brightens portions of the image but fails to stay faithful to the intended luminance.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Integrated power supply: 2.0, 1 review
    An external power brick adds cable clutter compared with a neatly integrated power supply.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    overall satisfaction: 2.5, 1 review
    A detailed tester found the overall package less impressive than expected: its responsiveness is appealing, but picture quality and omissions prevent it standing out.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    single-player cinematic gaming suitability: 2.5, 1 review
    Single-player games are playable, but dark or cinematic scenes lack the deep blacks and contrast needed for dramatic atmosphere.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    overdrive tuning: 2.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The Fast overdrive setting offers the most sensible balance of speed and visual quality. Faster may measure quicker but produces obvious overshoot and distracting halos.
  • 3.0
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    color accuracy: 3.0, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Factory color is contentious: instrumented tests found oversaturation and poor accuracy without an sRGB clamp, while another account described natural-looking colors. Calibration dramatically improves the result.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Pixel density: 3.0, 1 review
    Pixel density is serviceable for Full HD at 24 inches, though fine details look noticeably less defined than on QHD or 4K.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Resolution: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Full HD looks reasonably crisp on a 23.8-inch screen and is easy to drive at high frame rates. It cannot match 1440p for dense text or detailed desktop work.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sharpness: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Text and images are acceptably clean at normal 24-inch viewing distance. Higher-resolution monitors provide finer detail and more working space.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    color gamut: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Color coverage is satisfactory for games and routine SDR work but limited for demanding Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 editing. Unrestricted color output can also appear oversaturated.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    ghosting control: 3.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Ghost trails are minor in sensible Normal and Fast modes. The most aggressive setting introduces inverse ghosting that makes motion look worse.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Photo editing: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Casual photos look acceptable, but oversaturation, basic resolution, and restricted color gamut limit precise editing.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Gaming feature selection: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A crosshair, frame-rate counter, and Black Stabilizer are useful gaming extras, although the overall feature selection remains basic.
  • 3.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    motion clarity: 3.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Fast-moving games look fluid at 180Hz, but fine motion detail is not as clean as on stronger esports displays. Motion blur and overdrive artifacts limit the best-case image.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    College study setups: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A flexible stand, compact screen, and smooth gaming refresh suit a student who switches between coursework and games.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 4.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Budget-focused buyers get an enjoyable 180Hz PC-gaming display with unusually flexible ergonomics. Its value depends on keeping the price below more capable alternatives.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Casual gaming: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Casual gamers get fluid 1080p play, adaptive synchronization, and an accessible price without needing premium extras.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Portrait orientation: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Portrait rotation works well for reading, coding, and chat windows, especially when used as a secondary display.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dual-monitor setups: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Compact size, stable IPS angles, and portrait rotation make it a useful secondary monitor for code or documents.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dual-monitor workstations: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The adjustable, rotatable stand and consistent off-axis image are practical assets for a dual-monitor workstation.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Mixed work-and-play setups: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A high-refresh gaming panel plus an ergonomic stand makes sense for light work between play sessions. Screen space and color fidelity are the tradeoffs.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Racing games: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Racing games benefit from the smooth 180Hz motion and responsive IPS image when driven by a suitably fast PC.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Shared-screen viewing: 4.0, 1 review
    Off-center viewers benefit from stable IPS viewing angles, so colors remain reasonably consistent across seats.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Single-cable laptop docking
    1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Single-cable laptop docking: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    No USB-C video and charging connection means this cannot serve as a one-cable laptop dock.
  • HDR gaming
    1.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    HDR gaming: 1.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    HDR gaming lacks bright highlights and convincing blacks. SDR is the preferred mode for both PC and console play.
  • USB-C laptop docking
    1.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    USB-C laptop docking: 1.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    USB-C laptop users need another connection plan: there is no direct USB-C input, hub, or charging support.
  • Color-critical work
    1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Color-critical work: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Accuracy-critical work is hampered by oversaturated defaults and insufficient wide-gamut coverage. Even with calibration, this is not a professional color display.
  • Print photo editing
    1.5
    1 review
    Print photo editing: 1.5, 1 review
    Limited wide-gamut coverage makes print-oriented photo editing a weak fit, particularly where Adobe RGB accuracy matters.
  • Dark-room viewing
    2.0
    1 review
    Dark-room viewing: 2.0, 1 review
    IPS glow, visible backlight bleed on one unit, and shallow black levels make dark-room viewing less satisfying.
  • Video editing
    2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Video editing: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Casual video editing is possible, but limited wide-gamut coverage and modest resolution make serious color work a poor match.
  • Desktop productivity
    3.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Desktop productivity: 3.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Web browsing and basic office tasks work well on the clean 24-inch image. Heavy multitasking, spreadsheets, and dense text benefit from higher resolution.
  • Bright-room viewing
    3.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    Bright-room viewing: 3.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Matte glare control makes typical daylight or room lighting manageable. Direct sun can be too intense for the available brightness.
  • Programming and coding
    3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Programming and coding: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Portrait rotation can help with long code files, but the 1080p workspace is cramped for complex IDE layouts.