LG 27GR83Q-B

LG 27GR83Q-B Feature Scores

Explore all 67 feature scores for LG 27GR83Q-B, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

67 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    29 (43%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    4 (6%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (12%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (3%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 5.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Its 240Hz operation is a major draw, noticeably smoothing fast games compared with 144Hz or 165Hz displays when the PC can supply enough frames.
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    HDMI 2.1 support: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 inputs are a standout at this price, providing high-refresh compatibility beyond what many rival 1440p monitors offer.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    A dependable, fast 1440p gaming monitor that earns broad approval for responsive play. The limited HDR image and changing sale prices are its recurring qualifications.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    input lag: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Controls feel immediate, and measured processing delay is consistently very low. That makes fast reactions one of the monitor's most convincing strengths.
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    240Hz, low latency, and good motion tuning are particularly persuasive for esports and fast shooters. Running close to 240fps makes the most of it.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    VRR compatibility: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    FreeSync and G-SYNC compatibility work well across differing frame rates, giving gamers tear-free play without major reported disruptions.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    adaptive sync performance: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Variable refresh runs smoothly with both major GPU ecosystems; testers report few flicker or tearing issues.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    motion clarity: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast-moving objects remain clear and fluid at high refresh rates, with a few testers noting OLED or premium strobed LCD alternatives can look sharper.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    console gaming compatibility: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    PS5 and Xbox owners benefit from strong HDMI compatibility, 120Hz support, VRR, and useful 4K-input downscaling. HDR quality remains the main console caveat.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Resolution: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    1440p is a satisfying middle ground between crisp detail and attainable high frame rates, especially on a 27-inch screen.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    brightness: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Bright SDR output is a real asset in sunny rooms, although the impressive headline luminance cannot compensate for weak HDR contrast.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    PC gaming compatibility: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    This is a strong fit for modern PC gaming, especially fast titles with capable graphics hardware and DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1 output.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    response time: 4.3, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Pixel transitions generally keep pace well with fast play, although technical tests find the claimed 1ms figure optimistic and tuning less ideal at the refresh-rate extremes.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    color gamut: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Wide-gamut coverage brings vivid color, with sRGB limiting available when accuracy matters more than saturation.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Construction receives positive comments for solid plastics and a stable-feeling build, rather than flashy materials.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    on-screen display usability: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    A quick joystick and responsive menus make changing picture modes, overdrive, and inputs relatively painless.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sharpness: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Games and text look crisp at the 27-inch QHD pixel density, making the step up from 1080p worthwhile.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    port selection: 4.3, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Two HDMI 2.1 connections, DisplayPort, USB-A, and audio output cover gaming essentials well, but the missing USB-C dock-style input restricts work use.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    VESA mount compatibility: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Standard 100×100mm mounting and a positive firsthand arm-mounting account make it straightforward to free up desk space.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Color calibration controls: 4.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    An adjustable sRGB mode, unlocked RGB controls, and hardware calibration support are unusually useful for a midrange gaming display.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    viewing angles: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The IPS panel holds its image well from the sides, making shared viewing more comfortable than on many VA competitors.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    ghosting control: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The Fast overdrive mode contains inverse ghosting well, but maximum settings can introduce visible overshoot.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    overdrive tuning: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast generally works best at medium and high refresh rates, while Normal is preferable around 60Hz; the most aggressive setting sacrifices visual cleanliness.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    design and aesthetics: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Muted gray styling looks tidy on a desk and avoids aggressive lighting; the industrial rear housing is still distinctly gaming-oriented.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Pixel density: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The pixel density is noticeably finer than a comparably sized 1080p monitor, improving text and small in-game details.
  • 4.0
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    stand adjustability: 4.0, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Height, tilt, and portrait pivot are useful, but swivel is absent; one assessment describes broader adjustments, so physical flexibility is not completely agreed upon.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The value rises sharply when discounted into the roughly $300–$400 range. Several testers consider its original $500 positioning hard to justify against newer, less expensive rivals.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    color accuracy: 3.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Colors are often good to very good after modest adjustments, while factory oversaturation and differing white points prevent universal out-of-box precision.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Image scaling: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Accepting a 4K/120Hz console signal and scaling it to QHD is an appreciated compatibility convenience.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    VRR flicker: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Testing reports clean VRR behavior without noticeable flicker, including with adaptive sync engaged.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    panel type: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The IPS panel gives pleasing speed, bright SDR output, and broad viewing angles, at the cost of OLED-like blacks and contrast.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Gamma tracking: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Gamma is broadly near target in tested modes, with the adjustable sRGB preset helping achieve better tonal accuracy.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    overall picture quality: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    SDR picture quality is attractive and sharp for the price, especially in bright games, with the expected IPS limitations in dark material.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    Stand stability: 4.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The standard base feels secure despite its broad legs, with testers generally describing sound construction.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Display-mode switching reliability: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fast menu response and reliable PC-to-console input changes are strengths, aided by configuration options for sleep behavior.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Photo editing: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    With sRGB adjustments or calibration, colors can become accurate enough for serious photo work even though it is primarily a gaming screen.
  • 3.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Gaming feature selection: 3.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Crosshairs, a frame-rate counter, and black stabilizer cover the common gaming extras, though the selection is not especially expansive.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    black equalizer performance: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The black stabilizer can lift shadow visibility to make opponents easier to spot, a practical gaming adjustment rather than a cure for poor native contrast.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Headphone output quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Its headphone connection supports DTS Headphone:X and can be useful with compatible headsets; the enhanced spatial experience depends on the headphones.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    USB hub functionality: 3.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Two USB-A downstream ports serve simple peripherals, but the upstream connection is USB-B and there is no convenient USB-C docking solution.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Power efficiency: 5.0, 1 review
    Measured power use is low for a bright 240Hz IPS screen, minimizing the monitor's energy penalty.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    premium feel: 5.0, 1 review
    Sturdy materials and restrained styling make the screen feel better finished than its utilitarian feature set might suggest.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    PWM flicker comfort: 5.0, 1 review
    Flicker-free backlight operation is a welcome characteristic for people who notice screen flicker.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    reflection handling: 5.0, 1 review
    A light matte finish suppresses reflections effectively without making the picture overly grainy.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Screen coating clarity: 5.0, 1 review
    The matte coating helps in brighter surroundings while leaving the image reasonably clean and clear.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    DisplayPort connectivity: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    DisplayPort offers a reliable route to high-refresh QHD PC play alongside the two well-equipped HDMI inputs.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    screen size: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The 27-inch panel offers a comfortable desktop footprint and room for several windows, without matching the canvas of a larger editing display.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    GPU demands: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    1440p is easier to drive than 4K, but approaching 240fps in demanding games still calls for a capable graphics processor and CPU.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    eye comfort features: 4.0, 1 review
    Flicker-free backlighting and a low-blue-light setting provide basic comfort controls.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Gradient smoothness: 4.0, 1 review
    Some HDR content benefits from the supported color depth, which can make transitions look smoother than SDR.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Spatial audio quality: 4.0, 1 review
    DTS Headphone:X can enhance positional sound and movie immersion when used with compatible headphones.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Screen bezel design: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Thin framing helps the understated look, though another tester finds the bezels slightly larger than on some other LG 27-inch displays.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    USB port accessibility: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Rear connections are easy to find but not always convenient for frequently unplugged accessories, resulting in mixed assessments.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    HDR performance: 1.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    HDR input is supported, but the display lacks the contrast and local dimming needed for convincing bright highlights against dark scenes.
  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    local dimming performance: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    With no meaningful local-dimming system, bright objects cannot pop against deep blacks the way they can on mini-LED or OLED screens.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Backlight strobing: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The absence of strobing is a disappointment for gamers wanting the sharpest possible moving images at 240Hz.
  • 2.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    black levels: 2.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Blacks are relatively shallow compared with VA, mini-LED, and OLED displays; dim scenes may look gray rather than deep black.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    HDR highlight detail: 1.0, 1 review
    Limited highlight headroom can clip bright information and reduce separation in high-contrast scenes.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    built-in speakers: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    There are no internal speakers, so a headset or separate audio setup is needed for sound.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    gaming image presets: 2.0, 1 review
    The FPS and RTS presets are seen as gimmicky by one owner, who prefers choosing settings manually.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HDR tone mapping accuracy: 2.0, 1 review
    HDR color and tone presentation need work, even apart from the more fundamental missing local dimming.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    productivity versatility: 2.0, 1 review
    Fast gaming is clearly its priority; office-oriented rivals can offer more convenient connectivity and switching options.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    single-player cinematic gaming suitability: 2.0, 1 review
    Story-driven games can still look good in SDR, but dark-scene contrast and weak HDR blunt their cinematic impact.
  • 2.8
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    contrast: 2.8, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Contrast is acceptable for an edge-lit IPS panel, yet the limited separation between bright and dark elements is conspicuous in cinematic scenes.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Desk footprint: 2.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    The V-shaped stand can take more desk depth than compact alternatives, although one tester finds the legs less intrusive than expected.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    listing accuracy: 3.0, 1 review
    The advertised 1ms pixel response should not be taken literally in normal operation, though most other stated specifications hold up.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    screen uniformity: 3.0, 1 review
    Uniformity is reasonable rather than exceptional, with some edge falloff that may vary from unit to unit.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bright-room viewing: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Its strong SDR brightness and anti-glare characteristics make the image comfortable even with significant daylight.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Portrait orientation: 4.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Portrait pivot is available and useful for vertical secondary screens, with sufficient height adjustment for flexible placement.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Budget-conscious buyers: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Discounted prices can make 240Hz QHD gaming unusually attainable, while the original higher price is less compelling.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Color-critical work: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Careful calibration can deliver accurate SDR color, but strict professional workflows should not assume factory perfection or dependable HDR mastering.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Video editing: 3.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Resolution and respectable color performance support everyday editing, but the limited workspace and calibration needs temper its appeal for demanding projects.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Casual gaming: 5.0, 1 review
    Casual games benefit from sharp 1440p graphics and smooth output, even if the full 240Hz potential is most relevant to competitive titles.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Dual-monitor setups: 5.0, 1 review
    The affordable price and common panel size make matched multi-screen arrangements more approachable than with expensive OLEDs.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Mixed work-and-play setups: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Its gaming speed pairs with usable color and desktop clarity, making it workable for a mixed setup even though dedicated productivity features are sparse.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Streaming setup: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The color range and usable image quality suit typical creator and streaming setups, though this is not a complete production hub.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Dual-monitor workstations: 4.0, 1 review
    A uniform three-screen arrangement is financially plausible, with a central landscape display and vertical side monitors.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Movies and streaming: 4.0, 1 review
    Bright scenes and colors look pleasant for casual viewing, but dark movies and cinematic HDR are less impressive than on stronger-contrast screens.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Shared-screen viewing: 4.0, 1 review
    Broad viewing angles keep colors reasonably consistent for someone off to the side, although a non-swiveling stand makes repositioning less convenient.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • HDR gaming
    1.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    HDR gaming: 1.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    This is chiefly an SDR gaming display; HDR games lack the highlight impact, dark-scene depth, and consistent color balance enthusiasts expect.
  • HDR color grading
    1.0
    1 review
    HDR color grading: 1.0, 1 review
    HDR grading is a poor match because HDR imagery looks inconsistent and lacks the range needed to judge highlights reliably.
  • Dark-room viewing
    2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dark-room viewing: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Low IPS contrast makes dark scenes less convincing, although the minimum backlight level is tolerable for ordinary nighttime use.
  • Desktop productivity
    3.0
    1 review
    Desktop productivity: 3.0, 1 review
    Basic multitasking works, but a lack of office-focused features and limited ergonomics make other monitors more versatile for work.