LG 27GR83Q-B

LG 27GR83Q-B Monitor Review

Brand: LG
Released: August 25, 2023
Updated: 2 days ago
4.2
Overall review score
285
Review insights
67
Scored features
11
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Excellent 1440p/240Hz speed, low latency, and HDMI 2.1 make this a strong PC-and-console gaming monitor at a discount. Weak HDR, limited blacks, and sparse productivity extras keep it from being an all-purpose standout.

Competitive PC players who want smooth 1440p/240Hz gaming and console owners needing HDMI 2.1, 120Hz, and VRR. It suits value-focused buyers especially well when discounted.

HDR enthusiasts and dark-room cinematic gamers who prioritize deep blacks and vivid highlights. USB-C laptop dockers and office-first users seeking an integrated KVM or compact base may also prefer another monitor.

Verdict

The LG 27GR83Q-B gets the important gaming fundamentals right. Its 27-inch 1440p IPS panel, 240Hz refresh rate, low input lag, and well-controlled motion make fast PC games feel responsive without demanding 4K-level graphics power. Full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 also makes it unusually convenient for PS5 and Xbox gaming, including 120Hz signals and VRR. The bright SDR picture, wide viewing angles, and strong calibration options give it more flexibility than a pure esports display. Its limits are just as clear: blacks are shallow, there is no meaningful local dimming, and HDR looks flat next to good mini-LED or OLED alternatives. The broad stand and lack of USB-C docking may also frustrate office users. Price is decisive. At a substantial discount it is a convincing high-refresh buy; at its original $500 positioning, several alternatives deserve a closer look.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

67 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    29 (43%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    4 (6%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (12%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (3%)

Pros highlights

  • 5.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 5.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Its 240Hz operation is a major draw, noticeably smoothing fast games compared with 144Hz or 165Hz displays when the PC can supply enough frames.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    A dependable, fast 1440p gaming monitor that earns broad approval for responsive play. The limited HDR image and changing sale prices are its recurring qualifications.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    VRR compatibility: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    FreeSync and G-SYNC compatibility work well across differing frame rates, giving gamers tear-free play without major reported disruptions.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The value rises sharply when discounted into the roughly $300–$400 range. Several testers consider its original $500 positioning hard to justify against newer, less expensive rivals.
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    HDMI 2.1 support: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 inputs are a standout at this price, providing high-refresh compatibility beyond what many rival 1440p monitors offer.
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    240Hz, low latency, and good motion tuning are particularly persuasive for esports and fast shooters. Running close to 240fps makes the most of it.

Cons highlights

  • 1.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    HDR performance: 1.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    HDR input is supported, but the display lacks the contrast and local dimming needed for convincing bright highlights against dark scenes.
  • 2.8
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    contrast: 2.8, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Contrast is acceptable for an edge-lit IPS panel, yet the limited separation between bright and dark elements is conspicuous in cinematic scenes.
  • 2.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    black levels: 2.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Blacks are relatively shallow compared with VA, mini-LED, and OLED displays; dim scenes may look gray rather than deep black.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Desk footprint: 2.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    The V-shaped stand can take more desk depth than compact alternatives, although one tester finds the legs less intrusive than expected.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bright-room viewing: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Its strong SDR brightness and anti-glare characteristics make the image comfortable even with significant daylight.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Portrait orientation: 4.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Portrait pivot is available and useful for vertical secondary screens, with sufficient height adjustment for flexible placement.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Budget-conscious buyers: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Discounted prices can make 240Hz QHD gaming unusually attainable, while the original higher price is less compelling.

Not ideal for

  • HDR gaming
    1.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    HDR gaming: 1.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    This is chiefly an SDR gaming display; HDR games lack the highlight impact, dark-scene depth, and consistent color balance enthusiasts expect.
  • HDR color grading
    1.0
    1 review
    HDR color grading: 1.0, 1 review
    HDR grading is a poor match because HDR imagery looks inconsistent and lacks the range needed to judge highlights reliably.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in VRR flicker, Image scaling, Display-mode switching reliability, near average in overall satisfaction, input lag, below average in HDR highlight detail, single-player cinematic gaming suitability, productivity versatility.

Comparison summary

67 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    30 (45%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    20 (30%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    17 (25%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
HDR highlight detail 1.0 3.4 -2.4
single-player cinematic gaming suitability 2.0 4.4 -2.4
productivity versatility 2.0 4.2 -2.2
VRR flicker 5.0 3.0 +2.0
local dimming performance 1.0 2.9 -1.9
Image scaling 5.0 3.1 +1.9
Display-mode switching reliability 4.5 2.6 +1.9
gaming image presets 2.0 3.8 -1.8

Consider This Instead

If you want better black levels

Choose LG 27GX790A-B. It scores 5.0 vs 2.2 for black levels, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better productivity versatility

Choose MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for productivity versatility, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better single-player cinematic gaming suitability

Choose MSI MAG 274QPF X30MV. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for single-player cinematic gaming suitability, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: affordable true HDR versus 240Hz SDR AOC sacrifices 240Hz speed but offers stronger HDR hardware and a cheaper cited price.
  • Compared: image quality and viewing angles The AOC is favored for black levels and HDR impact, while LG offers the wider viewing angles.

Gigabyte M27Q X

  • Similar: response times and availability The Gigabyte is described as similarly fast but comparatively hard to purchase.
  • Compared: gaming connections versus creator features The LG favors HDMI 2.1 and motion tuning, while Gigabyte brings stronger productivity tools.

MSI G274QPX

  • Compared: speed, features and price LG edges MSI on tuning and adjustments, but the MSI is attractive at a lower selling price.
  • Compared: value, motion tuning, and HDMI LG is preferred for tuning and HDMI 2.1 but not worth the full price gap cited.

FAQ

Does it actually run at 240Hz at 1440p?

Yes. It supports 1440p at up to 240Hz, including through full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1, but your PC must produce high frame rates to make the most of it.

Is it good for PS5 and Xbox Series X?

Yes. The HDMI 2.1 ports support useful console gaming functions including high-frame-rate 120Hz output and VRR; it can also accept a 4K/120Hz signal and downscale it to 1440p.

Is the HDR worth using?

Usually not if you expect a dramatic HDR upgrade. With no effective local dimming and limited contrast, HDR highlights and dark scenes lack impact, and one owner preferred SDR.

How is motion performance for competitive games?

240Hz and low input lag are strengths. Fast overdrive is a broadly useful choice at higher refresh rates; around 60Hz, Normal is often cleaner.

Can it be used for photo or video editing?

Yes for ordinary SDR work, especially after adjusting sRGB settings or calibrating. More demanding color work and HDR grading are less suitable.

Does it have USB-C docking or built-in speakers?

No. It has HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort, a two-port USB-A hub, and headphone audio, but no built-in speakers or USB-C video/power docking.

What price makes it worthwhile?

Several reviewers favor it near $300–$400, with $350–$400 often discussed as attractive. At $500, competing mini-LED and 240Hz alternatives weaken its value.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

rtings.com

The LG 27GR83Q-B is a mid-range 27-inch, 1440p gaming monitor. Part of the 2023 UltraGear gaming lineup, it's a step-down model from the LG...

Review score
3.9
techspot.com

For PC gamers not using the latest high-end GPUs, 1440p gaming monitors provide an excellent compromise for playing at high refresh rates...

Review score
4.3

Top Monitors to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Swift 34 QD-OLED PG34WCDN
4.5

This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.

Pros: color gamut, contrast

Cons: value for money, Resolution

#2 MSI MPG 341CQR QD-OLED X36
4.4

The 360Hz QD-OLED panel delivers exceptional HDR gaming, responsive motion, and cleaner text than earlier ultrawides. Its 3440×1440 resolution is less sharp than 4K, and premium pricing remains a hurdle.

Pros: refresh rate, Text fringing

Cons: Resolution, GPU demands

#3 Dell U4025QW
4.4

A huge, sharp ultrawide workspace and unusually capable Thunderbolt dock make the U4025QW outstanding for demanding productivity and editing. Its high price, modest HDR, and imperfect motion handling keep it...

Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, built-in speakers

#4 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
4.4

Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker