LG 27GX700A-B

LG 27GX700A-B Feature Scores

Explore all 65 feature scores for LG 27GX700A-B, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

65 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    17 (26%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (37%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    10 (15%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    reflection handling: 4.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The matte treatment significantly reduces mirror-like reflections and preserves black depth in bright rooms. The tradeoff is occasional diffuse haze or grain.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    response time: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Near-instantaneous OLED pixel changes are consistently praised for clear, immediate gameplay.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    brightness: 4.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The fourth-generation Tandem OLED panel often looks brighter than older WOLED monitors, especially in SDR and very small HDR highlights. Not every tested game or HDR setting delivers the expected peak.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    color gamut: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The expanded gamut brings richly saturated colors and strong HDR color coverage, representing a clear improvement over older WOLED generations.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 4.6, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The 280Hz refresh, exceptionally quick pixel response, and low lag make competitive games feel immediate and clear. Even faster esports models exist for players prioritizing refresh above image quality.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    motion clarity: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast movement stays sharp and readable at high refresh rates, with the near-instantaneous OLED response a consistent gaming highlight.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    refresh rate: 4.5, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    At 280Hz, gaming feels notably smoother and motion is clearer than at mainstream refresh rates. A few premium alternatives go even faster.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    input lag: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Low input lag makes both PC and console controls feel highly responsive, matching the quick OLED pixel transitions.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    PC gaming compatibility: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    High-refresh PC play is a clear strength, combining GPU-variable-refresh support with low lag and crisp motion.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    contrast: 4.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    True OLED blacks deliver striking image depth and contrast without blooming. Some inaccurate presets alter perceived black detail despite that panel strength.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 4.2, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    At around the strongest sale prices, fast Tandem OLED performance looks compelling. At launch-like pricing, the omitted docking features and picture compromises are much harder to forgive.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    single-player cinematic gaming suitability: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Deep blacks and bold light effects make atmospheric adventures immersive, but lower-frame-rate games do not exploit the 280Hz ceiling and HDR can be inaccurate.
  • 4.0
    8 reviews low consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.0, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Judgments vary sharply: several testers call it a favorite gaming OLED or an excellent sale purchase, while one strongly rejects its HDR tuning and grainy coating.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Blooming control: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bright objects appear against deep blacks without the glowing halos commonly seen around LCD backlight zones.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    black levels: 4.3, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Per-pixel OLED blacks make dark environments exceptionally deep, including under ambient lighting. Some picture modes lift or crush near-black tones.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    overall picture quality: 4.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Rich color, perfect blacks, and unusually sharp motion make games visually impressive. Grading inaccuracies, gray bands, and a grainy matte finish can take away some of that impact.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    adaptive sync performance: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    FreeSync and G-SYNC compatibility keep motion fluid across supported PCs. Large frame-rate swings can still produce visible flicker in dark scenes.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    Automatic brightness limiting: 4.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Brightness behavior varies by scene and setting. Some gaming tests found little distracting dimming, though switching bright windows and larger HDR highlights can expose limits.
  • 3.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    HDR performance: 3.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    There is strong HDR impact and deep contrast, but major disagreement about real-game brightness and accuracy. Very bright settings sometimes overexpose the image or crush dark detail.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Built-in RGB lighting: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Rear accent lighting adds some flair and was reported working correctly during hands-on testing.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    design and aesthetics: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The UltraGear styling is smart and premium-looking, with restrained lines and accent lighting; the substantial base may look oversized to some.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Desk footprint: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    One take appreciates the compact flat base for small desks, while another finds the heavy stand disproportionate. Placement depends on available space.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    on-screen display usability: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The OSD remains familiar and reasonably approachable, with accessible brightness, picture, and OLED-care settings.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    console gaming compatibility: 3.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    PlayStation support is generally strong, including high-refresh operation from accepted 4K signals. Xbox Dolby Vision is absent, and some console setups require changing HDMI compatibility settings.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Color brightness: 3.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Tandem OLED makes bright, saturated colors more convincing than older WOLEDs, but QD-OLED alternatives can still deliver stronger color luminance.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    build quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The chassis feels sturdy and thoughtfully built, with substantial support behind the display.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    ghosting control: 5.0, 1 review
    Near-instant OLED response leaves fast motion unusually free of trailing and ghosting in action games.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    premium feel: 5.0, 1 review
    The clean UltraGear styling and stable stand help it look and feel like a high-end gaming display.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Stand stability: 5.0, 1 review
    The heavy metal stand keeps the screen firmly planted even during competitive play, despite its somewhat bulky appearance.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    black equalizer performance: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Black Stabilizer can lift visibility or help adjust shadow tones in dark games, although it cannot completely repair underlying HDR tracking errors.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sharpness: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Game imagery looks crisp, although fine desktop print and the matte coating can reduce perceived detail versus 4K or glossy alternatives.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    stand adjustability: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Height, tilt, and swivel flexibility are praised; one comparison finds a glossy LG sibling slightly more ergonomic.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    audio settings: 4.0, 1 review
    DTS Headphone:X processing is appreciated as a useful option for headphones connected to the display.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    burn-in protection: 4.0, 1 review
    Pixel-shifting protection is useful, but long periods of static taskbars and editing interfaces still warrant care with OLED ownership.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    eye comfort features: 4.0, 1 review
    The coating, improved text presentation, and stable white appearance make longer reading and office sessions less tiring than on some earlier OLED designs.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    GPU demands: 4.0, 1 review
    The 1440p resolution is easier to drive at high frame rates than 4K, though taking full advantage of 280Hz still calls for a capable gaming PC.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Headphone output quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The headphone jack with DTS processing earned a positive listening impression; a separate headset is still needed for sound.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Resolution: 4.0, 1 review
    The 1440p picture looks sharp for gaming while remaining easier to run than 4K, though it is not the best match for ultra-fine text.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    software support: 4.0, 1 review
    Menus and current firmware seem functional, though a critical tester felt substantial updates were needed to improve the picture.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    gaming image presets: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Gaming picture modes offer useful flexibility, but their gamma, saturation, and HDR accuracy vary substantially. Choosing the wrong preset can compromise shadow detail.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    HDMI 2.1 support: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    HDMI 2.1 supports modern console and high-refresh connections, but one hands-on setup needed an input compatibility change before 120Hz worked.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Gamma tracking: 1.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Gamma is a recurring weakness: brighter-than-intended midtones and some poorly matched presets can require full calibration to correct.
  • 2.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    HDR tone mapping accuracy: 2.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    HDR tracking is among the biggest drawbacks: modes often brighten the whole image or crush shadows, and adjustments can trade accuracy against spectacular highlights.
  • 2.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Shadow detail: 2.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Some modes lift shadows to improve visibility while others crush them and lose detail. Calibrating the monitor does not always fully solve the issue.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    KVM switch performance: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    There is no integrated KVM to share keyboard and mouse between computers. Hybrid desk setups need external hardware or a different monitor.
  • 2.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    screen uniformity: 2.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Gray bands and dirty-screen patterns can be visible, particularly in dim scenes and on dark-mode backgrounds; experiences differ notably across panels.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    USB-C power delivery: 1.0, 1 review
    No combined USB-C video-and-power laptop solution means extra cables and separate charging.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dolby Vision support: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The lack of Dolby Vision limits Xbox HDR flexibility compared with monitors that support that format.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    VRR flicker: 2.5, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Several testers noticed brightness flicker when frame rates fluctuated, particularly in dark games. One sample had little obvious flicker, so severity varies.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    built-in speakers: 2.0, 1 review
    There are no integrated speakers, so audio needs to come from a headset or separate speakers.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HDR adjustment controls: 2.0, 1 review
    Tweaking HDR settings can improve tracking, yet even after adjustments some dark details and highlights remain inaccurate.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HDR highlight detail: 2.0, 1 review
    Some tested modes under-track highlights or sacrifice detail for brightness, so HDR precision does not always match the panel’s impressive peak capability.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    warranty and support service: 2.0, 1 review
    The shorter two-year warranty is a disadvantage beside commonly available three-year OLED alternatives.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Photo editing: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    It can handle routine photos after appropriate adjustments, but serious editing is less certain because of gamma, white-balance, and color-accuracy concerns.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    DisplayPort connectivity: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    DisplayPort 1.4 handles the native high-refresh mode but lacks the newer 2.1 connectivity found on some premium alternatives.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    port selection: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Two HDMI 2.1 inputs, DisplayPort, USB-A hub ports, and headphones cover straightforward gaming. USB-C and a KVM are missing for more elaborate desks.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    viewing angles: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Off-axis quality is generally decent, though one direct comparison found colors wash out faster than on an older LG OLED.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Display-mode switching reliability: 3.0, 1 review
    Accessing 120Hz over HDMI can require manually selecting the proper AV compatibility mode before the option appears.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    ease of use: 3.0, 1 review
    Most menus are familiar, but console users may need a less-than-obvious HDMI input-mode adjustment to unlock 120Hz.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Pixel density: 3.0, 1 review
    1440p is practical at 27 inches and less taxing for games than 4K, but fine text is visibly softer than on similarly sized 4K monitors.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Pixel refresh effectiveness: 3.0, 1 review
    Running pixel-clean cycles may soften gray-band artifacts on some Tandem OLED panels, but they are not a guaranteed cure.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    reliability over time: 3.0, 1 review
    Near-black banding can change after the first weeks of ownership, with some panels improving and others still showing it. Unit variation is an important uncertainty.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Screen coating clarity: 3.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The matte coating is divisive: some see a surprisingly clean image with low glare, while others find its grain and softened highlights highly distracting.
  • 3.1
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Text fringing: 3.1, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The new subpixel arrangement reduces intrusive color edges around text, but small type can still look softer than on a high-resolution LCD.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    color accuracy: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    SDR sRGB accuracy earns praise from some testers, while others report substantial white-balance and gamma errors. HDR accuracy is especially contentious without careful adjustments.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Bright-room viewing: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Unlike many OLED alternatives, the panel keeps blacks convincing in well-lit rooms and its matte coating reduces reflections. Sunlight can still create diffuse glare.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Video editing: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Some testing and hands-on use found regular video editing comfortable, especially with the expanded gamut. Static timelines, dark-mode banding, and imperfect accuracy require consideration.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Dark-room viewing: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Dark-room contrast is gorgeous, but visible gray banding, shadow crush, and occasional VRR flicker can be especially noticeable with dark material.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    HDR gaming: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    HDR game lighting can look spectacular against OLED blacks, with bright highlights in cinematic titles. The uneven tone mapping and weak results in some games leave the experience less reliable than it could be.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    A deep discount can make this a compelling entry to fast Tandem OLED gaming; at higher asking prices, similarly equipped alternatives deserve close comparison.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    Mixed work-and-play setups: 3.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    It handles both gaming and lighter creative or office work, with some owners using it for video editing. Missing USB-C docking and KVM, plus text softness, make it less convenient for demanding hybrid desks.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Casual gaming: 4.0, 1 review
    Older games and less demanding play still benefit from the striking contrast and image quality; the very high refresh ceiling is not essential for them.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • HDR color grading
    2.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    HDR color grading: 2.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The wide color gamut is attractive, but inconsistent HDR tone mapping and lost shadow detail make exact grading a risky fit.
  • Single-cable laptop docking
    1.0
    1 review
    Single-cable laptop docking: 1.0, 1 review
    It cannot combine laptop video, peripherals, and power through one USB-C cable, so a separate docking arrangement is necessary.
  • USB-C laptop docking
    1.0
    1 review
    USB-C laptop docking: 1.0, 1 review
    Without USB-C video and data input, the monitor is a poor match for simple work-laptop docking.
  • Multi-computer workflows
    2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Multi-computer workflows: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Using two computers is possible, but sharing peripherals requires external switching because there is no built-in KVM.
  • Movies and streaming
    2.0
    1 review
    Movies and streaming: 2.0, 1 review
    OLED contrast brings depth to movies and HDR video, but inaccurate HDR picture modes can alter dark scenes and highlights.
  • Programming and coding
    2.0
    1 review
    Programming and coding: 2.0, 1 review
    Coding with small fonts is possible but not ideal, as text can be softer and fringed compared with a 4K IPS monitor.
  • Desktop productivity
    3.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Desktop productivity: 3.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Documents, browsing, and light office work are quite usable, helped by brightness and improved fringing. Small-font sharpness and matte haze make work-first 4K displays more appealing.
  • Long-term ownership
    3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Long-term ownership: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    OLED burn-in remains a consideration with repeated static interfaces, and banding can vary from unit to unit. Gaming-heavy use is less demanding than a permanent office desktop.
  • Color-critical work
    3.0
    1 review
    Color-critical work: 3.0, 1 review
    The broad gamut is useful, but precise work needs calibration and careful selection of modes; some units show large enough inaccuracies to deter demanding editing.
  • Shared-screen viewing
    3.0
    1 review
    Shared-screen viewing: 3.0, 1 review
    Sharing the picture with someone next to you is acceptable, but colors shift sooner at an angle than on some competing OLED monitors.