Best 2024 Monitors for response time

#1 MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED
5.0

Near-instant pixel response is a consistent standout, producing crisp action with very little smearing.

Pros: overall satisfaction, DisplayPort connectivity

Cons: value for money, reliability over time

#2 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
5.0

Near-instant OLED transitions keep action crisp with exceptionally low blur and very little meaningful pixel-response delay.

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker

#3 Dell Alienware AW2725DF
5.0

Near-instant OLED pixel transitions keep fast objects clean and responsive without the usual LCD overshoot or trailing.

Pros: competitive gaming suitability, color gamut

Cons: brightness, HDMI 2.1 support

#4 LG 27GX790A-B
4.9

Extremely rapid pixel transitions keep edges crisp even through frantic camera movement, supporting the monitor’s esports strengths.

Pros: refresh rate, competitive gaming suitability

Cons: value for money, brightness

#5 ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS
4.8

Pixel response is exceptionally quick for this class, with balanced default settings that avoid large overshoot penalties.

Pros: value for money, Resolution

Cons: HDR performance, port selection

#6 Dell Alienware AW3225QF
4.4

Instant-feeling OLED pixel response keeps both high- and lower-refresh motion very clean, with no need for typical LCD overdrive adjustment.

Pros: overall satisfaction, brightness

Cons: Dolby Vision support, VRR flicker

#7 Samsung Odyssey G70D S32DG70
4.1

Pixel transitions are generally quick enough for enjoyable gaming; the strongest real-world praise concerns overall responsiveness rather than the advertised 1ms claim.

Pros: PC gaming compatibility, overall picture quality

Cons: overall satisfaction, Smart TV platform

#8 Dell Alienware AW2725QF
3.9

Pixel response is fast for IPS and helps make gaming smooth, but the most rigorous measurements show blur and overshoot that hold it back from the best 360Hz screens.

Pros: Resolution, refresh rate

Cons: HDR performance, contrast

#9 LG 24GS65F-B
3.9

Pixel response remains consistent across refresh rates, and a moderate overdrive setting performs well. Some motion blur remains, and the maximum setting creates visible artifacts.

Pros: adaptive sync performance, response time

Cons: HDR performance, console gaming compatibility

#10 Samsung Odyssey G50D S27DG50
3.8

The panel is generally responsive, especially with tuned overdrive, but the advertised 1ms claim should not be taken literally and faster competitors exist.

Pros: stand adjustability, competitive gaming suitability

Cons: value for money, port selection

#11 Dell U4025QW
3.0

Pixel response is serviceable for occasional play but can obscure fine moving details, making dedicated gaming displays faster and cleaner.

Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, built-in speakers

#12 ASUS ProArt Display PA27JCV
3.0

Pixel response is adequate for basic use but not optimized for fast-moving games.

Pros: color accuracy, overall picture quality

Cons: HDR performance, refresh rate

#13 Dell Ultrasharp U3425WE
2.8

The 5ms-class response time is acceptable for everyday work and casual gaming, but it is not competitive with dedicated gaming displays. Gaming-focused alternatives can deliver much faster pixel response.

Pros: overall satisfaction, productivity versatility

Cons: value for money, reliability over time

#14 Lenovo ThinkVision M14t Gen2
2.0

Its 6ms fastest setting is not enough for demanding players, and trying to speed motion can produce visible shadows.

Pros: overall picture quality, Stylus usability

Cons: port selection, refresh rate