Metro Redux Feature Scores
Explore all 95 feature scores for Metro Redux, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
95 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.036 (38%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.432 (34%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.419 (20%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.48 (8%)
Pros
Sort
-
Bustling communities, political factions, makeshift economies, and everyday conversations make the underground feel lived in. World-building is among the collection’s most consistently praised strengths.
-
Oppressive tunnels, ruined streets, and living communities create the package’s defining mood. Atmosphere draws unusually consistent praise, although brighter remastered lighting loses some original darkness for a few fans.
-
2033’s rebuilt visuals, imported systems, and redesigned flow make this much more than a resolution upgrade. Last Light receives comparatively modest changes, making a second purchase harder to justify for some existing owners.
-
The collection is strongly recommended overall, especially for first-time players drawn to atmospheric shooters. Persistent AI flaws, uneven action, and limited Last Light changes prevent universal enthusiasm.
-
Masks, wristwatches, hand-charged lights, physical animations, and ordinary station life make the world tangible. Ranger’s reduced interface can intensify that connection while sacrificing convenience.
-
PS4 and Xbox One commonly earn praise for smooth 60fps play; Switch usually holds a consistent 30fps. Rare hitches and firefight dips are reported but generally have limited impact.
-
Limited light, dwindling air, and sudden mutant danger create sustained fear beyond simple jump scares. Horror works especially well during slower, methodical play and optional exploration.
-
The mysterious Dark Ones, political conflict, and human survival make the stories compelling. Last Light often earns the stronger response, although some prefer 2033’s spiritual tone or criticize forced late plotting.
-
The rebuilt 2033 makes the largest visual leap, while Last Light remains attractive with smaller changes. Switch presentation draws strong praise overall, with dissent over soft textures, docked sharpness, and aging character assets.
-
The ports generally run impressively for their hardware, with Switch receiving particular praise for stable delivery and low input latency. A few accounts find docked presentation weaker or PC performance demanding at higher settings.
-
Creaks, mutant calls, footsteps, and useful stealth cues do much of the work in sustaining tension. Switch audio quality and surround support impress, though occasional reused effects draw criticism.
-
Lighting and shadows give tunnels, ruined streets, and stealth encounters much of their impact. Missing original particles, reduced console effects, and chunky Switch flames qualify otherwise strong praise.
-
Redux improves the original’s sluggish handling, while the Switch port wins particular praise for fast response. Its 30fps cap usually does little to undermine the controls.
-
The imported stealth system makes 2033 substantially more playable, with lighting, knives, and alternate routes supporting satisfying guard hunting. Opinions split on how much weak or overly forgiving AI undermines it.
-
The Russian underground, survival demands, and literary storytelling distinguish the collection from standard action shooters. Its slower, stranger identity is a major part of the appeal.
-
Two campaigns and their extras make a persuasive package for newcomers, especially at the lower prices cited. Existing Last Light owners and buyers paying a Switch premium have a less clear value case.
-
Most accounts enjoy both campaigns, from deliberate stealth to Spartan’s more direct action. The strongest enthusiasm comes from the combination of atmosphere and varied play.
-
Graffiti, scavenged structures, ruins, and small equipment details help sell the devastation. Richly observed environments remain a strength even when individual textures or character models show their age.
-
Hidden passages, supplies, and small optional encounters reward looking beyond the main path. Exploration is especially appealing when the danger and discoveries reinforce each other.
-
Human encounters and heavy, improvised weapons often make combat satisfying. Forced mutant waves, weak damage feedback, and crowded fights are the recurring exceptions.
-
Gas-mask filters, limited ammunition, and hand-charged light make survival feel practical and immediate. Fans value the tension, while others find upkeep frustrating or poorly matched to Last Light’s action-heavy sections.
-
Mask upkeep, hand-charged lighting, and weapon adjustments give the shooting practical depth. Most enjoy the blend, although some find the handling clumsy or the survival demands intrusive.
-
Station backstories, diary entries, and sequel revelations add meaningful depth to the setting. The extra context rewards players interested in understanding the world beyond the immediate mission.
-
The story-led campaigns offer a refreshing, substantial solo alternative to multiplayer-focused shooters. Several accounts place them among the strongest single-player FPS experiences available on their platforms.
-
Responsive aiming and carefully tuned sticks help the shooting feel dependable. Switch motion aiming is especially admired, although one account finds fast mutant fights hard to track even up close.
-
The two campaigns and DLC provide substantial playtime without requiring an enormous commitment. Most value the length, though one account finds Last Light overstays its welcome.
-
Human resilience, loss, and glimpses of ordinary life create lasting emotional moments. A minority struggle to care about the characters or find some later developments manipulative.
-
Stealth, firefights, scavenging, and quiet station visits generally work best as one connected experience. The balance makes the campaigns feel richer than a continuous shooting gallery.
-
Switch motion aiming is widely admired for precise adjustment and useful long-range shots. Effective surround support also helps preserve the fuller console experience.
-
Multiple play styles and the substantial 2033 overhaul give fans reasons to return. Several accounts find the new modes too modest to justify replaying or repurchasing Last Light by themselves.
-
The blend of stealth, survival, action, weapons, and extra missions gives the package breadth. Repeated tunnel scenery, narrow arsenals, and less dramatic differences between modes are the main reservations.
-
Changing between human fights, mutant threats, exploration, and civilian stations keeps the adventures varied. Last Light’s bigger optional spaces are especially welcome, although scripted stretches remain less appealing.
-
The interface carried over from Last Light makes 2033 easier and more consistent to use. Clearer feedback helps players understand equipment and stealth situations.
-
Last Light’s larger, connected spaces generally offer stronger tactical possibilities than 2033’s chokepoints. Some still find the series too linear or note dated sections that the remaster leaves intact.
-
Handheld visuals are often praised as clean and striking, making portability a compelling reason to buy. Deep shadows and bright surroundings can impair visibility, and not every account prefers the portable graphics.
-
The complete DLC inclusion strengthens the edition and removes earlier restrictions around Ranger mode. Physical Switch coverage also values keeping the entire package on one cartridge.
-
Interactive lights let players reshape stealth encounters, while burning webs and reactive scenery make the world feel tangible. Small physical interactions do useful work beyond visual decoration.
-
Included missions and challenges add worthwhile breadth, with the Kshatriya library adventure a highlight. Their value is lower for owners who already have the original DLC, and some prefer the main campaigns.
-
Survival, Spartan, and Ranger options accommodate very different preferences. Praise for the choice sits alongside complaints about difficulty spikes, artificial enemy durability, and harsh resource limits.
-
The remaster feels smoother than the original, and deliberate, weighty movement can strengthen the physical connection to Artyom. Higher console frame rates also reduce the old sluggishness.
-
Having both games and DLC on one Switch cartridge is a strong attraction for physical buyers. The Rangers Cache presentation adds another appealing option.
-
Bullets that double as currency create a memorable choice between buying supplies and surviving a fight. Scarcity adds tension for many, but others find ammo or filters too limited, while easier settings can remove the pressure entirely.
-
Logs and Last Light’s added background help develop Artyom’s personal journey. The sequel’s characters can be stronger, although female roles are criticized for limited development.
-
Diary pages and hidden finds often deepen the story and encourage exploration. A dissenting discussion finds collecting Artyom’s own scattered diary entries narratively awkward.
-
Radial menus simplify equipment selection and replace the original’s cumbersome interface. Awkward ammo bindings and returning to the dashboard to switch games are narrower usability complaints.
-
The gloomy art conveys devastation effectively, and Last Light often looks more striking. Some prefer the original’s stranger creature designs or find the repeated palette limiting.
-
Literary roots and environmental storytelling give the writing unusual strength for a shooter. Implausible child dialogue, awkward diary logic, sexualized scenes, and forced romance draw more specific criticism.
-
Musical alert cues make stealth easier to understand, while the lighter provides useful directional guidance. That navigational help is much more valuable once players know it exists.
-
Optional areas and encounters provide useful ammunition, filters, and equipment. Scavenging feels most worthwhile when the supplies directly support continued survival.
-
The remaster is praised for preserving the games’ identity while improving their execution. Style options can also bring Last Light closer to the survival emphasis some original fans prefer.
-
Attachments offer worthwhile ways to adapt weapons and improve their effectiveness. A smaller shop selection in Last Light disappoints one player, but customization is broadly welcomed.
-
Minimal overlays and Ranger’s HUD removal can deepen immersion. The same choice makes navigation, inventory selection, and some prompts less convenient, especially before the controls become familiar.
-
Overheard conversations make stations feel inhabited and often reward stopping to listen. Some English exchanges, compulsory dialogue, and the child’s lines feel awkward or dated.
-
The Switch controls feel good with both the Pro Controller and Joy-Cons. Careful tuning supports comfortable play despite the lower frame-rate cap.
-
Weapon development adds depth to simple shooting and can turn weak starting equipment into useful tools. Progress comes through practical improvements to the arsenal.
-
Artyom’s coming-of-age arc is a highlight for one account, and added background makes him more engaging in Last Light. His appeal rests on vulnerability and personal context.
-
Music often builds unease and shifts effectively into action, with Last Light’s opening guitar especially admired. Repetition and a perceived move toward more bombastic cues disappoint some listeners.
-
Last Light’s rail-car exploration stands out as a campaign highlight. Stopping at optional locations adds freedom and survival encounters to the journey.
-
Some welcome the sequel’s broader enemy mix and differing attack styles. Others still find too few distinct opponents across the package.
-
For the accounts that weigh its absence, multiplayer is successfully offset by the selection of campaign modes. The attraction remains the story-led solo experience.
-
Using Last Light’s voice actor for Artyom is judged a better fit than the predecessor. The praised casting choice supports the protagonist’s presentation.
-
Last Light introduces appealing new characters that broaden its cast. The added personalities are welcomed as part of the sequel’s stronger story.
-
The Rangers Cache package appeals through its attractive presentation and included collectible items. It gives physical collectors an extra reason to consider that edition.
-
The survivors’ dry, flinty humor gives them humanity despite the grim setting. Small jokes suggest people finding reasons to keep going.
-
Replacing old loading breaks with additional connecting gameplay stands out as an unusually thoughtful remaster idea. That change is admired for going beyond visual refurbishment.
-
Subtle actions and mercy can affect endings in ways some find meaningful and refreshing. Others dislike the opaque requirements and feeling that the system pushes an unnecessary replay.
-
English translation can make jokes and exchanges awkward. The supplied discussion favors Russian voices with subtitles for a more convincing experience.
-
The achievement list offers plenty to pursue across play styles and hidden areas. Most goals are described as approachable, with extra searching needed for the remainder.
Cons
Sort
-
Deep shadows can make spaces and threats difficult to distinguish, especially on the original Switch screen or in bright surroundings. Crowded firefights can also become disorienting.
-
Boss encounters are a consistent weak spot for the assessments that discuss them. They are described as dated, cumbersome, or tedious additions that fit poorly with the stronger stealth and atmosphere.
-
Sparse or questionable checkpoints can amplify early difficulty and lengthy sections. They are particularly frustrating when combined with unpredictable enemies or depleted filters.
-
Two assessments criticize women’s limited and sexualized roles. Female characters are considered less fully developed than the world around them.
-
Facial expression improves in places, but lip sync and stiff or vacant faces remain frequent criticisms. The remaster does not fully disguise the age of the character presentation.
-
2033 does not consistently explain mechanics added from Last Light, including burning webs and using the lighter for guidance. Missing instruction can leave players stuck or discovering useful functions unusually late.
-
One Switch technical assessment finds the rumble insufficiently nuanced and distracting enough to disable. Its contribution to the atmosphere is negative in that account.
-
One detailed assessment finds the romance contrived. It is a specific weakness within an otherwise admired narrative.
-
One technical account warns that checkpoints can preserve a state with too few filters to finish. Escaping that repeated-death loop may require restarting the level.
-
One stealth-focused account dislikes the lack of a third-person camera. The light indicator helps but does not completely replace that preferred view.
-
The Survival and Spartan changes are judged less substantial than the developer’s description suggests. Their presence alone is not a compelling reason to rebuy Last Light.
-
Residents and new personalities can enrich the narrative, but not every character connects. Complaints focus on interchangeable supporting figures and a child who neither looks nor behaves convincingly.
-
Minimal directional help can make routes confusing. The lighter’s directional flame is useful once discovered, but some players rely heavily on the compass or miss a passage.
-
Larger Last Light encounters provide some freedom of approach, but both campaigns remain tightly scripted. Waiting behind invisible boundaries and following predetermined routes can feel restrictive.
-
Varied human encounters and optional areas can be excellent, but repeated mutant swarms draw frequent criticism. Forced action and scripted sections sometimes expose the combat’s weaknesses.
-
Voice acting is one of the more divided production elements. Some find it solid or well suited to Artyom; others criticize forced Russian accents, reused voices, and an unconvincing child performance.
-
Weapons can have satisfying punch, and knives or upgraded guns are effective tools. Early firearms, damage feedback, and enemies that absorb too many rounds are recurring combat complaints.
-
Brief QTEs can heighten danger, but hidden prompts in the harshest modes are much less comfortable. Their appeal depends on whether tension or clear guidance matters more.
-
Learning through trial and error appeals to players who welcome limited hand-holding. Unexplained interactions can instead turn that learning process into needless frustration.
-
Spartan mode offers a gentler way into the games by reducing resource pressure. The benefit is qualified by poorly explained mechanics that can still obstruct a first playthrough.
-
Companion behavior receives some technical refinement, but waiting for allies to reach doors remains frustrating. Their scripted role can interrupt otherwise improved gameplay.
-
Redux removes many original glitches but retains some collision, visual, and audio faults. Most describe the remaining problems as distracting rather than game-breaking.
-
Switch’s initial level loads are the most repeated technical complaint and can exceed a minute. Fast reloads after death soften that drawback, while merged Redux levels reduce interruptions on other platforms.
-
The alternation of danger and station life can feel expertly paced. Others find companion waiting, scripted downtime, long action stretches, or Last Light’s extended campaign disruptive.
-
The overhaul improves rough edges without completely hiding the games’ age. Character movement, lip sync, and occasional technical quirks keep the package from feeling uniformly polished.
-
More consistent detection is a major improvement over the original 2033. Reactions remain divisive: some find opponents believable and tactical, while many report oblivious guards, predictable rushing, or poor navigation.
-
Detailed physical actions can make Artyom feel convincingly present. Character stiffness, mechanical movement, and slow NPC interactions remain noticeable to several accounts.