LG gram +view 16

LG gram +view 16 Feature Scores

Explore all 51 feature scores for LG gram +view 16, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    17 (33%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (33%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (16%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Resolution: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Its 2560 × 1600 panel is repeatedly singled out for laptop-like clarity and extra working space over common 1080p portables.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    color gamut: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Broad sRGB and P3 coverage makes colors vivid and is a major advantage for a lightweight work display.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    aspect ratio: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The 16:10 shape shows more code, document rows and web content vertically than 16:9, making it particularly useful for work.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    portability and weight: 4.5, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The panel is unusually slim and light for its screen area, so it slips into a laptop bag; the folio adds noticeable carry weight.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    setup ease: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    On a compatible laptop, connecting one USB-C cable is generally enough to start using the display immediately.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    overall picture quality: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The 16:10 IPS display earns high praise for crisp detail, lively colors and unusually strong image quality for a portable monitor.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.4, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most assessments recommend the +view as a lightweight second screen with a very sharp panel. Enthusiasm is tempered by stand design and connectivity limitations.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sharpness: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Text and graphics look noticeably crisp, and the resolution is repeatedly appreciated in office and mobile workflows.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    USB port accessibility: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    USB-C ports on both sides make it easier to place the panel left or right of the laptop without awkward cable routing.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    contrast: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    IPS contrast is generally praised as strong for a portable monitor, with measured ratios around 1,160:1–1,210:1 in multiple tests.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    color accuracy: 4.3, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Colors typically appear pleasing and sufficiently accurate for everyday images and some creative tasks, though the Dell P1425 and dedicated creator models can be more accurate.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Pixel density: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Fine pixel density keeps letters crisp at a normal working distance, with individual pixels hard to spot.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    screen size: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The generous roughly 16-inch screen adds meaningful workspace while remaining manageable beside a laptop.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    design and aesthetics: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Slim edges, narrow bezels and a clean metallic style make this an attractive laptop companion.
  • 4.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    brightness: 4.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Many testers find the display bright enough indoors and in moderately bright settings, though direct sun and comparisons with brighter competitors expose limits.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    premium feel: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The thin metallic finish earns praise for its upmarket feel, even if the folio stand does not match the panel’s refinement.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    viewing angles: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The IPS screen keeps colors fairly stable when viewed from the side, with only modest brightness loss at extreme angles.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Window tiling tools: 4.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    LG software can split or move windows across screens, helping multitasking, although not everyone wants the added feature complexity.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ease of use: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Straightforward USB-C operation and simple brightness control make everyday use easy, with some complaints about software complexity.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    Photo editing: 3.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Photos tend to look natural and colorful, making casual photo editing viable; one comparison favors a more specialized ProArt monitor for design work.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 3.7, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Some consider the sharp, bright panel worth its premium, while others recommend cheaper screens for basic tasks or fixed-desktop use.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    PC-based monitor controls: 3.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    LG software supports screen controls and productivity features, but some users find it cluttered or missing fine color adjustment options.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Mac integration: 5.0, 1 review
    The USB-C connection and slim design make it an attractive extra screen for compatible MacBooks.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Power-on readiness: 5.0, 1 review
    The display can come on automatically when connected to a compatible notebook without needing a separate power-button step.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Storage footprint: 5.0, 1 review
    Its remarkably thin profile makes it practical to slip into a backpack alongside a laptop.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Screen bezel design: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Narrow, mostly uniform bezels help the screen match the sleek profile of a modern laptop.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    build quality: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Some users praise a slim, premium-feeling metal body, while another comparison finds the stand and construction cheaper-feeling than rivals.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    reflection handling: 3.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    The matte coating diffuses glare better than some glossy rivals, although strong direct reflections remain visible.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    documentation quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The manual can help explain how to fold the stand into its less obvious positions.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Power efficiency: 4.0, 1 review
    One tester found its power draw modest for a portable display, although it still takes energy from the host laptop.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    productivity versatility: 4.0, 1 review
    Extra space and LG window-management tools add useful flexibility to a dual-display workflow.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Screen coating clarity: 4.0, 1 review
    The matte surface reduces distracting reflections more effectively than a glossy portable competitor.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Shadow detail: 4.0, 1 review
    Testing finds the panel retains useful detail in both bright and dark portions of footage.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    on-screen display usability: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reviewers disagree on the minimalist physical controls: some appreciate simple brightness adjustment without menus, while detailed display tuning is limited.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Folio cover protection: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The magnetic folio shields the screen, but several reviewers warn that most of the rear remains unprotected against bag scratches.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Host laptop battery drain: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Running the panel from a laptop can shorten laptop battery life, especially at higher brightness.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    built-in speakers: 1.0, 1 review
    There are no speakers on the version tested, which limits standalone multimedia and console ambitions.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Color calibration controls: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fine control of color temperature and channels is limited or absent in LG’s utility, making OS controls or calibration software more important.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    External power dependence: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The display has no internal battery, so using it away from an outlet requires a compatible powered host or power arrangement.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Retail availability: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The older 16MQ70 US variant is described as discontinued, meaning new-stock availability and support can depend on seller.
  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    Device compatibility: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    It integrates readily with USB-C laptops that support video and adequate power, but HDMI devices and some game consoles are problematic.
  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    Stand stability: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Stand impressions vary: some find the magnetic folio usable, while others say it tips easily or feels flimsier than a hinged kickstand.
  • 2.7
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    stand adjustability: 2.7, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The folio allows basic tilt and portrait arrangements, but its folding angles and lack of height adjustment limit flexibility.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    console gaming compatibility: 2.0, 1 review
    With no HDMI input, connecting a console requires an appropriate converter or another display; console use is not a core strength.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Software and driver support: 2.0, 1 review
    The LG Switch app offers useful options, but one user found it cluttered and could not get automatic orientation to work on two PCs.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Touch input availability: 2.0, 1 review
    There is no touchscreen, and at least one comparison says spending slightly more gets a touch-enabled alternative.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    warranty and support service: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A one-year warranty draws criticism against multi-year rivals, and older discontinued variants require careful seller checks.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Stand weight: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The folio adds hundreds of grams, making ready-to-carry weight noticeably higher than the bare screen.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    Automatic orientation switching: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Auto-rotation gets both praise when it works and criticism when it fails or requires installing extra software.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    USB-C power delivery: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    USB-C capabilities appear to differ across the units and generations discussed: one test reports passthrough, while another says the older screen cannot charge the laptop.
  • 3.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    port selection: 3.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Two USB-C inputs on opposite edges make cable placement flexible, but the lack of HDMI is a repeated limitation.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Desktop productivity: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Extra vertical pixels make documents, spreadsheets, browsing and multitasking noticeably easier without a bulky desktop monitor.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Travel: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Its thin, low-weight design is well suited to carrying a large second screen in a backpack or on a commute, provided the laptop can power it.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Portable workstation use: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A compatible laptop gains a crisp, generous second screen while away from a fixed desk; the folio stand is the main setup frustration.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    USB-C laptop docking: 4.2, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The +view is convenient as a USB-C laptop screen, provided the laptop outputs DisplayPort video and sufficient power; it does not replace a full-featured dock.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Dual-monitor setups: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Beside a compatible laptop, the +view makes a practical dual-screen layout without requiring a full desk monitor.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Programming and coding: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The tall, high-resolution panel displays more code lines and context at once, making it an appealing side screen for programmers.
  • 3.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Bright-room viewing: 3.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The matte finish and useful brightness work well for most indoor bright rooms, but a sunny window or direct sunlight can still be distracting.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Apple ecosystem households: 5.0, 1 review
    Compatible Apple laptops gain a portable second screen through USB-C, with size and weight appealing to mobile users.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Dual-monitor workstations: 5.0, 1 review
    A notebook and +view together create a flexible desktop-like working area while staying portable.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    Portrait orientation: 3.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Portrait positioning is supported, but the folding folio can be awkward or unstable depending on the setup.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    Content creation: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Good broad-gamut color makes light photo and video work possible, but professional color workflows may require stronger calibration controls and accuracy.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Movies and streaming: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Video clips benefit from vivid colors and clear shadow detail, even though portable office use is the principal strength.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    College study setups: 4.0, 1 review
    Students with compatible USB-C laptops can benefit from the tall document-friendly second screen, though they must account for laptop power requirements.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Single-cable laptop docking: 4.0, 1 review
    A single compatible USB-C cable can carry video and power to the monitor, reducing clutter even though host charging capability varies by version.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Video editing: 4.0, 1 review
    Wide P3 coverage helps when working with video color, although the monitor is not presented as a dedicated grading display.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Budget-conscious buyers: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    One test calls it a strong simple budget choice, but others caution that less expensive monitors are enough for basic email or calls.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Dedicated PC monitor use
    2.0
    1 review
    Dedicated PC monitor use: 2.0, 1 review
    A traditional desktop monitor can offer more flexibility and better value if the display rarely leaves one desk.
  • Color-critical work
    3.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Color-critical work: 3.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Color gamut is impressive for a portable screen, but assessments differ on whether its calibration and Adobe-oriented accuracy are strong enough for exacting professional work.
  • Video conferencing
    3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Video conferencing: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The panel is usable as an additional screen for calls, but some testers say cheaper portables meet that basic need equally well.