Best 2025 TVs for low-resolution content handling

#1 Sony BRAVIA 2 II
5.0

Old broadcasts, DVDs and compressed streams clean up surprisingly well while retaining faces and fine textures.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, reliability

#2 Panasonic Z8BA OLED
5.0

Older, lower-resolution programming remains sharp and watchable thanks to confident scaling.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: size options, value for money

#3 Sony BRAVIA 5
5.0

Low-bitrate streams, old shows and SD broadcasts become more watchable through Sony's cleanup without heavy artificial sharpening.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: HDR brightness, value for money

#4 Hisense U8QG
4.3

SD and HD television feeds become clearer without much artificial edge sharpening, although old 4:3 content retains its sidebars.

Pros: peak brightness, HDR brightness

Cons: sound quality, viewing angles

#5 Hisense U65QF
4.3

Lower-resolution material holds up better than expected, especially with the TV's processing enabled. Minor artifacts can appear, but they are usually described as small rather than distracting.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#6 Sony Bravia 8 II
4.2

DVD, 720p and 1080p material is usually cleaned up impressively, though the TV cannot completely hide weak-source artifacts and some rivals extract a little more detail.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#7 Hisense 98QD5QG
4.0

Compressed, low-quality material is cleaned up effectively, with many artifacts removed and some detail preserved.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: Weight and handling, black levels

#8 LG StanByMe 2
4.0

Lower-resolution input can still look respectable: an 800p Steam Deck feed was judged decent on the 27-inch screen. That makes casual handheld-console use more forgiving.

Pros: overall satisfaction, portability and versatility

Cons: value for money, menu responsiveness

#9 Hisense U75QG
3.8

Lower-resolution content is watchable but inconsistent; some reviewers praise the cleanup while others find older or low-bitrate sources visibly rough.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#10 LG UA77
3.5

Compression smoothing cleans up low-bitrate streams nicely, but images can appear waxy or soft at lower resolutions.

Pros: viewing angles, smart TV platform

Cons: overall satisfaction, refresh rate

#11 TCL QM9K
3.5

Compressed video is smoothed competently, at the cost of a little fine texture. Poorly encoded sources remain more noticeable on very large screens.

Pros: peak brightness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, shadow detail

#12 Samsung U8000F
3.2

Lower-quality broadcasts may preserve jagged edges, blocks, or softness; HD input fares much better than 480p material.

Pros: color accuracy, upscaling quality

Cons: picture quality, sound quality

#13 TCL Q77K
3.0

Compressed streams and old video remain watchable, though noise cleanup trades away some fine texture.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: viewing angles, HDR performance

#14 Samsung U7900F
3.0

Older broadcasts and 720p sources remain watchable, especially when treated gently, but they are visibly softer than 1080p or native 4K.

Pros: picture quality, smart TV platform

Cons: value for money, refresh rate

#15 Samsung 100QN80F
3.0

Noise cleanup comes with detail loss.

Pros: Large-screen immersion, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, black levels

#16 LG QNED92A
2.8

HD material often scales cleanly, but very rough standard-definition clips can look messy or blurry. One assessment also found disappointing noise in regular Blu-ray content.

Pros: gaming performance, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#17 TCL QM5K
2.7

Compression smoothing is only fair. Heavily compressed streams and older broadcasts reveal soft textures and residual artifacts.

Pros: black levels, picture quality

Cons: HDR performance, blooming control

#18 Samsung QN70F
2.4

Old standard-definition video and poor cable feeds can look blurry, blocky or artificially smoothed despite the 4K processing label.

Pros: picture quality, 4K at 144 Hz support

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#19 TCL 98QM8K
2.3

Older streams and compressed broadcasts usually remain watchable, with useful artifact smoothing; very poor sources still expose their limitations.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#20 Hisense QD6QF
2.0

Compressed streams can retain blocking and posterization that the processor struggles to hide.

Pros: color accuracy, Picture detail

Cons: HDR performance, motion clarity