Best 2025 TVs for upscaling quality

#1 Sony BRAVIA 5
5.0

Making poor sources look better is the signature advantage here: HD, SD and compressed streams remain detailed and natural.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: HDR brightness, value for money

#2 Panasonic Z8BA OLED
5.0

Old television material is rendered with impressive crispness and natural detail.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: size options, value for money

#3 Sony BRAVIA 2 II
4.9

Sony's excellent processing sharpens HD and lower-resolution material with few jagged edges or artificial-looking details.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, reliability

#4 Hisense U8QG
4.7

Full HD, 720p, and even some DVD content look cleaner and more detailed than expected from such a large 4K panel.

Pros: peak brightness, HDR brightness

Cons: sound quality, viewing angles

#5 LG QNED85A
4.5

High-definition material scales smoothly to 4K, preserving clean edges without noticeable jagged stair-stepping.

Pros: picture quality, maximum volume

Cons: sound quality, bass performance

#6 Sony Bravia 8 II
4.4

Upscaling is among the TV’s strongest processing talents, making SD and HD material look cleaner, sharper and more detailed without excessive artifacts.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#7 Samsung U8000F
4.3

HD sources upscale respectably and often look clean, though the result can seem a little soft. Very low-resolution streams remain the weak point.

Pros: color accuracy, upscaling quality

Cons: picture quality, sound quality

#8 Hisense 98QD5QG
4.3

DVDs, HD streams and older footage often look cleaner and sharper, though the finest details cannot be restored.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: Weight and handling, black levels

#9 Hisense U65QF
4.3

Upscaling is generally good, with 1080p and sub-1080p material gaining useful detail and staying watchable. One test calls it merely decent and notes minor artifacts.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#10 LG StanByMe 2
4.0

Lower-resolution content can still look respectable on the 27-inch QHD panel. An 800p Steam Deck feed was judged decent rather than obviously poor.

Pros: overall satisfaction, portability and versatility

Cons: value for money, menu responsiveness

#11 LG QNED92A
3.9

The processor keeps most 720p and 1080p material sharp and watchable, with readable text and stable motion. Particularly low-quality or noisy sources expose its limits.

Pros: gaming performance, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#12 TCL QM5K
3.8

HD images generally hold together well, but DVD-quality or very low-resolution video remains soft, with fine details and edges degrading.

Pros: black levels, picture quality

Cons: HDR performance, blooming control

#13 Hisense U75QG
3.8

Upscaling is usually good and can make older material look cleaner and sharper, though weak streaming sources still expose processing limits.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#14 TCL 98QM8K
3.7

Lower-resolution programs are generally upscaled cleanly without aggressive artificial sharpening. They cannot match pristine native 4K material.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#15 TCL Q77K
3.7

HD and some lower-resolution material upscale clearly, yet very fine text and textures can become soft.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: viewing angles, HDR performance

#16 Samsung U7900F
3.7

Ordinary HD feeds are watchable and sometimes impressively clean, but small details may remain soft. The result varies from passable in testing to notably positive in hands-on demonstrations.

Pros: picture quality, smart TV platform

Cons: value for money, refresh rate

#17 TCL QM9K
3.5

Upscaled sources generally remain clear without excessive artificial sharpening, but fine details and lower-quality streams can still be less convincing than premium processing rivals.

Pros: peak brightness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, shadow detail

#18 Samsung 100QN80F
3.5

Upscaled sources look sharp, with some missing fine detail.

Pros: Large-screen immersion, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, black levels

#19 Samsung QN70F
3.1

HD sources usually look clean and reasonably sharp, while very low-resolution material remains soft or blocky and aggressive smoothing may remove detail.

Pros: picture quality, 4K at 144 Hz support

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#20 LG UA77
3.0

The scaling picture is mixed: some HD material looks clean and detailed, but technical tests find soft edges and text.

Pros: viewing angles, smart TV platform

Cons: overall satisfaction, refresh rate