TCL 98QM8K TV Review

Brand: TCL
Released: May 27, 2025
Updated: 12 hours ago
4.0
Overall review score
537
Review insights
91
Scored features
29
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Enormous HDR brightness and excellent local dimming make the 98QM8K a dramatic big-screen buy. Direct reflections, motion blur, limited HDMI 2.1 ports, and mixed built-in sound temper the excitement.

Centered-seating home theaters, bright-room HDR movie watching, and console gaming benefit from the extraordinary 98-inch picture and strong gaming support.

Wide seating layouts, rooms with bright windows directly opposite the screen, and setups needing more than two high-bandwidth HDMI sources are less suitable. The built-in speakers may also disappoint buyers avoiding a soundbar.

Verdict

The TCL 98QM8K makes an unusually compelling case for a nearly 100-inch home theater. Its dazzling HDR highlights, rich color, deep blacks, and tightly controlled blooming deliver the scale and punch usually associated with far more expensive setups. Modern consoles and gaming PCs benefit from low lag, variable refresh rate, and 4K at up to 144Hz. The compromises are important, though: only two HDMI ports support full gaming bandwidth, and the massive panel demands careful positioning and a wide stand. The glossy screen can mirror lamps and windows, far-off-center seats lose color, and some fast transitions smear or stutter. Factory accuracy and built-in sound also draw uneven assessments, while one sample developed audible fan noise at extreme brightness. At a meaningful discount, it is a striking large-screen buy; at a price close to newer alternatives, its limitations deserve more scrutiny.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

91 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (22%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    39 (43%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    16 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    16 (18%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.8
    25 reviews moderate consensus
    peak brightness: 4.8, 25 reviews, moderate consensus
    Peak HDR output is extraordinarily high, making highlights look brilliant on the giant panel. At the very highest settings, that intensity can become uncomfortable or bring out fan noise.
  • 4.6
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    picture quality: 4.6, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    The 98QM8K produces an impressive cinematic picture with vivid color, strong brightness, and deep contrast. Its most demanding scenes can reveal processing imperfections.
  • 4.1
    21 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.1, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The massive screen offers exceptional performance per dollar at a substantial discount, but the less expensive QM7K and newer rivals complicate the value calculation.
  • 3.9
    20 reviews low consensus
    sound quality: 3.9, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The Bang & Olufsen-tuned system gets praise for its spaciousness and bass from some listeners, while others find it muddy or underpowered.
  • 4.8
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    HDR brightness: 4.8, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    HDR highlights glow with unusually strong intensity, even across a nearly 100-inch screen. Some settings trade maximum output for more comfortable viewing.
  • 4.4
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    contrast ratio: 4.4, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Strong contrast gives bright objects depth against near-black backgrounds. The result approaches OLED in many scenes without matching pixel-level control.

Cons highlights

  • 2.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    HDMI 2.1 port count: 2.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    There are only two full-speed HDMI 2.1 ports. The separate eARC connection is helpful for soundbars but limits complex receiver setups.
  • 3.1
    10 reviews low consensus
    reflection handling: 3.1, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The screen can reflect windows and lamps almost like a mirror. Indirect room lighting is much less troublesome.
  • 3.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    bass performance: 3.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Bass is stronger than expected for some built-in TV speakers, yet others hear an artificial or thin low end, particularly at high volume.
  • 3.2
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    white balance accuracy: 3.2, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    White balance can be very close to reference after calibration, but some out-of-box modes show cooler or shifted tones.
  • 2.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    low-resolution content handling: 2.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Older streams and compressed broadcasts usually remain watchable, with useful artifact smoothing; very poor sources still expose their limitations.
  • 3.1
    6 reviews low consensus
    shadow detail: 3.1, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Dark scenes can look rich and detailed, but some testing found crushed near-black detail and dim midtones, particularly with challenging HDR grading.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.7
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Bright-room viewing: 4.7, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Very high light output makes daytime viewing practical even in sunny rooms, but windows facing the screen remain problematic.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    Movie watching: 4.8, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Movies look spectacular on the giant, high-contrast HDR display, especially in dark scenes and vivid masterings.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 4.4, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Discounted pricing puts premium HDR and a huge screen within reach of more budgets, but cheaper alternatives may satisfy less demanding buyers.

Not ideal for

  • Watching DVDs
    2.0
    1 review
    Watching DVDs: 2.0, 1 review
    Standard-definition discs remain watchable, though 4K content uses the panel’s detail and scale more effectively.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TVs, this product is above average in local dimming zone transitions, HDR brightness, local dimming performance, near average in picture quality, motion handling, below average in G-SYNC compatibility, Soundbar clearance, HDMI 2.1 support.

Comparison summary

90 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    32 (36%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    33 (37%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    25 (28%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
G-SYNC compatibility 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Soundbar clearance 2.0 4.1 -2.1
HDMI 2.1 support 2.3 4.1 -1.8
gradient handling 2.0 3.9 -1.9
local dimming zone transitions 5.0 3.1 +1.9
HDMI 2.1 port count 2.6 4.1 -1.6
HDR brightness 4.8 3.4 +1.4
local dimming performance 4.7 3.2 +1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better HDMI 2.1 port count

Choose Hisense UR8SG. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for HDMI 2.1 port count, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better low-resolution content handling

Choose Sony BRAVIA 3 II. It scores 4.6 vs 2.3 for low-resolution content handling, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better HDMI 2.1 support

Choose TCL QM9K. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for HDMI 2.1 support, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better reflection handling

Choose Hisense U7SG. It scores 4.7 vs 3.1 for reflection handling, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: newer model highlights and saturation The QM8L is brighter and punchier in some scenes; the QM8K competes on overall color.
  • Compared: color saturation versus brightness The QM8L offers more saturated reds in demonstrations; the QM8K remains formidable.
  • Alternative: clearance value versus extra HDMI inputs The successor adds more HDMI 2.1 ports, but the QM8K can be a better clearance buy.

Hisense U8QG (2025)

  • Compared: HDR contrast and gaming The TCL and Hisense compete closely on brightness with different image tradeoffs.
  • Compared: brightness and local dimming Both offer substantial HDR brightness, with the choice dependent on price and priorities.
  • Compared: cinematic image versus gaming The TCL looks more cinematic, while the Hisense is considered stronger for gaming.

TCL QM7K (2025)

  • Older model: brightness and contrast The QM8K gets considerably brighter than the QM7K.
  • Older model: HDR brightness and contrast The QM8K adds substantial HDR impact over the more economical QM7K.
  • Worse: HDR brightness The QM8K produces almost twice the HDR brightness of the less costly QM7K in this test.

FAQ

Is the TCL 98QM8K bright enough for a sunny room?

Yes. It has extraordinary HDR and SDR brightness, although lamps and windows directly opposite the glossy screen can still reflect strongly.

How many full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports are available?

Two of its four HDMI inputs support high-bandwidth gaming signals such as 4K at 120Hz or 144Hz. The eARC port is separate and limited to lower bandwidth.

Does it support PS5 and Xbox Series X gaming?

Yes. It supports 4K at 120Hz, VRR, and automatic low-latency mode on compatible inputs; PC gaming can reach 4K at 144Hz.

Do you need a soundbar?

Not strictly: some listeners praise the built-in sound and bass. Others report muddy audio, limited volume, or weak dialogue, so a soundbar is sensible for a screen this large.

How well does the picture look from the side?

Its viewing angle is better than some earlier VA TVs, but the tested 98-inch model can lose color saturation when viewed far off center.

Is the 98-inch stand different from smaller sizes?

Yes. The 98-inch uses two widely spaced feet rather than the center pedestal on smaller sizes; low screen clearance can cause a soundbar to block the picture.

Is professional calibration necessary?

Not necessarily. Filmmaker Mode can look natural immediately, but results vary by sample and preset, and calibration can substantially improve accuracy.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

tiermarks.com

TCL QM8K earns an A from our critic. Flagship brightness and flagship dimming for mid range money, with a short fault list that stays...

Review score
3.5

Top TVs to Consider

#1 Samsung S90H
4.5

Choose the S90H for bright-room OLED viewing, deep blacks and top-tier gaming without flagship pricing. Skip it if you want Dolby Vision, a glossy screen or the simplest smart-TV software.

Pros: glare resistance, black levels

Cons: Dolby Vision support, color gamut

#2 Roku Pro Series (2025)
4.4

Best for bright Mini-LED picture, excellent built-in audio, easy Roku navigation, and responsive 4K/120 gaming. Skip it if you want ad-free menus, premium motion consistency, or stronger confidence in long-term...

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, portability and versatility

#3 TCL QM8L
4.4

Choose the QM8L for a big, brilliantly bright TV with vivid HDR, deep mini-LED blacks, low input lag, and four HDMI 2.1 ports. Skip it if you need OLED-clean motion,...

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: stand quality, judder handling

#4 LG G6
4.4

Choose the G6 for class-leading bright-room OLED picture, rich color, deep blacks and elite gaming. Skip it if you want strong built-in audio, polished launch firmware, no account sign-in, or...

Pros: picture quality, peak brightness

Cons: value for money, sound quality