Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 87 feature scores for Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

87 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    23 (26%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    42 (48%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (11%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    12 (14%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    26 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.8, 26 reviews, strong consensus
    Most accounts describe cathartic, highly enjoyable shooting. Repetition limits that enjoyment for some despite the immediate thrill of combat.
  • 4.9
    20 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to franchise: 4.9, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Weapons, faction designs, environmental scale, and small details convincingly translate the tabletop universe into a retro shooter.
  • 4.7
    32 reviews moderate consensus
    combat system: 4.7, 32 reviews, moderate consensus
    Gunfire lands with exceptional weight, and the improved melee keeps fights visceral. A minority find the encounters too shallow or mindless despite that impact.
  • 4.8
    20 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.8, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Chunky sprites, gothic scale, and vivid palettes make the retro art direction a standout strength. The style captures grimdark excess with considerable personality.
  • 4.7
    30 reviews strong consensus
    level design: 4.7, 30 reviews, strong consensus
    Distinctive locations, shortcuts, verticality, and environmental set pieces are widely praised improvements. Restrictive corridors and repeated layouts still disappoint some players.
  • 4.8
    19 reviews strong consensus
    graphics quality: 4.8, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Sharp pixel art, expressive enemies, and varied environments create striking visuals despite the deliberately old appearance.
  • 4.7
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    sound design: 4.7, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    Heavy footsteps, crunchy impacts, and distinctive weapon reports make the sound design one of the game’s clearest strengths.
  • 4.4
    37 reviews moderate consensus
    overall quality: 4.4, 37 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most accounts see a confident, entertaining sequel with stronger variety and presentation. Its most skeptical critics find the expanded content too repetitive to feel like a major advance.
  • 4.5
    24 reviews moderate consensus
    enemy variety: 4.5, 24 reviews, moderate consensus
    Forces from all four Chaos gods broaden the bestiary and keep many fights fresh. Some feel the expanded roster still behaves too similarly.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Movement and shooting feel responsive on both mouse and controller. Remapping helps the default layout fit individual preferences.
  • 4.3
    37 reviews moderate consensus
    replay value: 4.3, 37 reviews, moderate consensus
    Two heroes, branching routes, hidden rewards, and difficulty options give the campaign substantial replay appeal. Some regard the shared missions and locked routes as padding or restrictions.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Skull-strewn industrial spaces, enormous structures, and detailed scenery convey the scale and oppressive character of the setting.
  • 4.4
    28 reviews moderate consensus
    movement feel: 4.4, 28 reviews, moderate consensus
    Nyra’s slide and aerial movement are frequent highlights, while Malum delivers a heavier sense of momentum. Some find the speed slippery or difficult to control near hazards.
  • 4.4
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    map and navigation design: 4.4, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    Guidance tools, an automap, clearer routes, and shortcuts reduce navigation frustration. Small interface complaints and occasional disorientation remain.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    immersion: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Strong combat flow, evocative art, and detailed sound can draw players deeply into the grimdark setting.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    world interactivity: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Breakable ice, collapsing structures, and exploitable hazards add tactical opportunities and make battlefields feel more active.
  • 4.4
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    content variety: 4.4, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Planet hopping brings welcome visual variety, from corrupted jungles to industrial and frozen facilities. Changing scenery does not always disguise familiar objectives.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    performance optimization: 4.6, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most tested systems run the game smoothly. Steam Deck accounts report some traversal or heavy-combat slowdowns despite generally good performance.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Cathartic combat, humor, and a powerful nostalgic pull can make the action absorbing and emotionally energizing.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    violence level: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Exaggerated pixelated gore is enjoyed as part of the weapon feedback and cathartic combat spectacle.
  • 4.1
    32 reviews low consensus
    weapon balance: 4.1, 32 reviews, low consensus
    The arsenal is widely praised for satisfying impact and varied roles. Nyra’s overlapping fire weapons, the crossbow, and the simplified damage system attract mixed reactions.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    accessibility options: 4.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Invulnerability, ammo assists, visual comfort settings, and flexible controls make it easier to tailor the action to different needs.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The Servo-skull’s dry observations and the heroes’ taunts add genuine laughs without abandoning the grimdark tone.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    polish: 4.6, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Several players find the sequel polished and well refined, though minor technical blemishes remain.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    atmosphere: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Gothic scale, oppressive scenery, and energetic character barks create a convincing Warhammer atmosphere.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    exploration quality: 4.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Hidden power-ups and seals reward careful exploration. Some wish the larger-looking environments offered more open routes.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    collectibles: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Well-hidden seals and useful secret power-ups give careful searching a payoff, sometimes requiring keen observation or clever platforming.
  • 4.1
    20 reviews low consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.1, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The metal and industrial score ranges from a major highlight to forgettable background music. The climactic guest-composed track attracts especially strong praise.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The roughly $25 asking price is generally considered good value, especially when alternate routes and a second hero encourage replay.
  • 4.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    frame rate stability: 4.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Desktop and console reports often describe stable high frame rates. Steam Deck can dip into the 30–40 fps range during traversal or crowded fights.
  • 3.9
    28 reviews low consensus
    character roster: 3.9, 28 reviews, low consensus
    The second protagonist adds a meaningful alternative for many players, though others find the heroes too similar. Being unable to switch freely during a campaign is a recurring frustration.
  • 3.9
    19 reviews low consensus
    Enemy design: 3.9, 19 reviews, low consensus
    Distinctive Chaos designs and varied attacks are frequent highlights. Some critics find too many foes interchangeable, overly durable, or insufficiently demanding.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    mission variety: 4.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Trains, rising hazards, and other set pieces keep many missions distinctive. Several accounts still find too many objectives built around keys and locked doors.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    protagonist appeal: 4.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Nyra is an energetic, appealing addition for many, often becoming the preferred protagonist. Others remain unconvinced that she matches Malum’s appeal.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Dry companion remarks and combat dialogue add levity and personality without slowing the action.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    hint system: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Optional objective guidance provides a welcome way back to the action when a route becomes unclear.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    animation quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Distinctive enemy gestures and violent animations add personality to the pixelated models.
  • 3.8
    12 reviews low consensus
    voice acting: 3.8, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Forceful taunts and committed lead performances earn substantial praise. A few dislike Nyra’s delivery, repeated lines, or the lack of voiced companion dialogue.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    handheld play suitability: 4.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Steam Deck and ROG Ally play can work very well, but small text, occasional frame dips, and awkward weapon cycling introduce compromises.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    checkpoint system: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Checkpoints generally limit lost progress and make retries feel fair rather than frustrating.
  • 3.6
    29 reviews low consensus
    core gameplay loop: 3.6, 29 reviews, low consensus
    The shooting can sustain a satisfying flow state, but repeated key hunts and arena purges divide opinion. Longer sessions expose the routine for some players.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 3.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Grenade time slowing, charges, and sword attacks add satisfying ways to fight. Some miss the tactical detail removed from the original.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    mission design: 3.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Memorable set pieces and clearer objectives strengthen missions, though repetitive key hunts can make their underlying structure feel familiar.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    sandbox freedom: 4.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    There is room to favor different weapons and approaches, but locking a campaign to one hero limits experimentation for some players.
  • 3.6
    13 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.6, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Brisk pacing keeps the action moving, yet relentless combat and occasional drawn-out stages can become exhausting. Others find the balance consistently engaging.
  • 3.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    game length: 3.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Single-run length estimates vary considerably with route and playstyle. Alternate paths and the second hero extend the package, though some still find the campaigns short.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    visual effects quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Lighting, explosions, and meaty impact effects help sell the spectacle and weapon power.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    progression system: 3.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    New weapons and enemy introductions create a clear sense of progress. Persistent character growth remains a missed opportunity for players wanting deeper development.
  • 3.5
    13 reviews low consensus
    choice impact: 3.5, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Branching routes offer appealing location choices and replay opportunities, but have little effect on the story. Some find the lockouts restrictive or the choices superficial.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    crash stability: 5.0, 1 review
    One PC and ROG Ally playthrough completed without crashes or other stability problems.
  • 3.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    boss design: 3.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Bosses divide opinion: elaborate multi-stage fights impress some players, while others find them conventional or underwhelming. The finale receives both praise and criticism.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    achievement list quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Separate hero completions and accessible difficulty assists make the achievement list approachable while adding replay goals.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    puzzle design: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Small puzzles and traversal challenges provide welcome reasons to think beyond shooting, including switches, environmental routes, and exploration rewards.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    side character depth: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The Servo-skull brings an irreverent personality and comic relief that make the companion more memorable.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    solo play quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    For players wanting a solo power fantasy, the campaign delivers focused and satisfying combat.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    writing quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The irreverent Servo-skull writing adds personality and well-timed comic relief amid the carnage.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    learning curve: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Simplified combat rules can make the action more intuitive, though the opening mechanics may take a little time to understand.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    upgrade system: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Weapon blessings deliver enjoyable temporary boosts, including distinctive upgrades such as dual pistols. Some would prefer lasting upgrades between levels.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    menu usability: 3.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The weapon wheel makes a large arsenal easier to manage. Cycling weapons with the D-pad can still feel awkward on Steam Deck.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    graphics settings: 4.0, 1 review
    Adjustable presentation options let players tune the look from chunky retro pixels toward a cleaner appearance.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    haptic feedback integration: 4.0, 1 review
    Controller vibration reinforces the weight and power of the protagonists.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    onboarding experience: 4.0, 1 review
    The opening gives the initial melee tools room to make sense before introducing shooting, helping the combat click into place.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    originality: 4.0, 1 review
    A modern twist on nostalgic shooting gives the presentation a charming identity.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    tutorial quality: 4.0, 1 review
    Starting with melee before introducing the gun helps teach the combat tools naturally.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    world-building: 4.0, 1 review
    Locations steeped in Warhammer history give the campaign a strong sense of place.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    AI behavior: 2.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Simple behavior, idle enemies, and foes trapped in terrain undermine some fights. The AI is one of the more consistent technical complaints.
  • 2.2
    9 reviews strong consensus
    innovation: 2.2, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The sequel expands and refines its foundation rather than radically changing it. That safe approach leaves some wishing for a more adventurous follow-up.
  • 2.3
    9 reviews low consensus
    combat readability: 2.3, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Crowded arenas, bright effects, poison attacks, and large flames can obscure threats. Some find the spectacle readable, but others find it exhausting or difficult to parse.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character development: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Both protagonists lack the development and narrative presence some players hoped a two-hero sequel would provide.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    co-op experience: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Players wanting to purge together are disappointed by the lack of co-op.
  • 2.5
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    narrative quality: 2.5, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    The thin story usually serves as a quick excuse for combat. Some welcome that restraint, while others miss context, character motivation, and a satisfying narrative payoff.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    HUD clarity: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Removing visible strength and toughness numbers leaves some players missing useful combat information.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    age appropriateness: 2.0, 1 review
    The carnage is considered too much for a young child by one account, reinforcing its mature appeal.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    couch co-op quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The lack of local co-op disappoints players who wanted to share the campaign with a friend.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 2.0, 1 review
    The relentless carnage makes this a poor fit for childhood play.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    multiplayer design: 2.0, 1 review
    The absence of multiplayer feels like a missed opportunity for a game with two protagonists.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 2.0, 1 review
    The lack of Xbox Play Anywhere support disappoints players hoping to carry the experience onto an Xbox handheld.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    user interface design: 2.0, 1 review
    Small dialogue and mission-briefing text is difficult to read on Steam Deck, with no font scaling to help.
  • 2.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    bug frequency: 2.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Bugs range from minor visual and collision problems to stuck enemies and arena exits that fail to open. Some playthroughs are largely trouble-free.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    aiming precision: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Precise aiming can take adjustment: default mouse sensitivity feels high to one player, while another struggles to connect shots while strafing.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lore depth: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The setting offers dense franchise flavor, but little new lore. Heavy jargon can make the narrative harder to follow without background knowledge.
  • 3.0
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    class balance: 3.0, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The heroes have distinct strengths, but opinions differ sharply on their balance. Nyra’s mobility and armor regeneration help some players, while others favor Malum’s weapons and durability.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    battery life: 3.0, 1 review
    Maintaining 60 fps can cost more battery in demanding Steam Deck areas, but the added smoothness is considered worthwhile.
  • 3.1
    7 reviews low consensus
    platforming precision: 3.1, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Platforming is divisive, with some enjoying the air control and others finding precise jumps awkward or slippery.
  • 3.2
    17 reviews low consensus
    difficulty balance: 3.2, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Difficulty draws sharply different reactions: Medium can feel too easy, while Hard can produce abrupt damage spikes. Adjustable settings help, and some find the challenge fair and rewarding.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    companion AI: 3.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Allied soldiers can provide breathing room and a sense of company, but their weak survival instincts sometimes turn them into accidental casualties.
  • 3.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    economy and resource balance: 3.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Ammo, health, and useful power-ups generally keep combat flowing. Small pickup radii, limited specialist ammo, and poorly timed discoveries can create friction.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Boomer-shooter fans: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast, weighty shooting and a deliberately old-school structure make this a strong fit for boomer-shooter fans. Familiar key hunts can still wear thin.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Warhammer fans: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Faithful weapons, Chaos factions, and grimdark environments give Warhammer fans plenty to enjoy, even when the story stays in the background.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Power-fantasy play: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Heavy weapons, abundant carnage, and optional assists deliver an exuberant one-person-army fantasy.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Short play sessions: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Compact levels and optional navigation guidance help shorter sessions feel productive, even when retries stretch the time needed.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Returning players: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Fans wanting more of the original’s shooting are likely to enjoy the refinements. Players hoping for a dramatic reinvention may be less satisfied.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    Franchise newcomers: 3.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Newcomers can enjoy the shooting without prior games or deep lore study. The story’s jargon and assumed knowledge are a much greater barrier for some.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    Handheld gaming: 4.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Portable play is generally recommended for its enjoyable controls and strong performance. Steam Deck readability and occasional frame drops warrant consideration.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Knowledge-driven exploration fans: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Learning secret locations and noticing environmental details can make exploration and later combat more rewarding.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Speedrunning and route optimization: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Route knowledge, secret placement, and higher-skill play make speedrunning and repeat mastery appealing.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Completionists: 5.0, 1 review
    Full completion is approachable with two campaigns, secret hunting, and optional assists that do not block achievements.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Infrequent play between other games: 5.0, 1 review
    One account finds it an enjoyable way to unwind between larger games.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Trophy hunting: 5.0, 1 review
    Built-in invulnerability can make the hardest-difficulty achievement much easier to obtain.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    Challenge seekers: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Higher difficulties, precise headshots, and mastery goals offer rewarding challenges, though one critic finds the difficulty extremes poorly designed.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Casual gamers: 4.0, 1 review
    Simple, immediately understandable action makes it approachable for casual play.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Online co-op with friends
    1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Online co-op with friends: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The campaign does not meet the wish for an online co-op outing with friends.
  • Players sensitive to visual clutter
    2.0
    1 review
    Players sensitive to visual clutter: 2.0, 1 review
    Players sensitive to visual clutter may struggle with the explosions, flashing effects, and dense hordes during purges.
  • First playthrough on Hard
    2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    First playthrough on Hard: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Experienced FPS players may prefer starting on Hard, but abrupt damage spikes and punishing close combat make that recommendation conditional.
  • Precision platforming fans
    2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    Precision platforming fans: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Precise platforming is a conditional fit: some praise mid-air control, while others find ambitious jumps slippery and frustrating.
  • Long play sessions
    3.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    Long play sessions: 3.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Some enjoy hours of absorbing action, while others find repetition and constant sensory pressure tiring over extended sessions.
  • Players sensitive to low frame rates
    3.0
    1 review
    Players sensitive to low frame rates: 3.0, 1 review
    Steam Deck players who need consistently high frame rates may notice occasional dips even though most play stays near 60 fps.