Best 2025 TVs for dirty screen effect

#1 Hisense U65QF
4.5

Dirty-screen performance is reported as solid, with only minor unevenness expected from time to time.

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#2 Samsung QN70F
4.0

The screen is largely clean during brighter material, though subtle nonuniformity can show on large uniform fields.

Pros: picture quality, 4K at 144 Hz support

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#3 Panasonic Z8BA OLED
4.0

Near-black surfaces are notably clean, with only subtle brightness variations or faint bands under scrutiny.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: size options, value for money

#4 Sony Bravia 8 II
4.0

Screen cleanliness is strong, with one direct test praising Sony’s handling of dirty-screen effect.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#5 Samsung U7900F
3.5

The central picture remains reasonably clean, though faint patches and darker edges can appear on uniform fields.

Pros: picture quality, smart TV platform

Cons: value for money, refresh rate

#6 Sony BRAVIA 5
3.5

Some slight center-screen patchiness can appear during bright panning shots, though it is rarely intrusive in normal viewing.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: HDR brightness, value for money

#7 TCL 98QM8K
3.3

Dirty-screen effect is subdued on several samples, though lighter backgrounds can reveal mild patches or dark bands.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#8 LG QNED92A
3.3

Sports fields and sweeping camera shots look mostly clean through the center, but darker edges or mild bands may appear.

Pros: gaming performance, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#9 TCL QM5K
3.2

Center-screen uniformity is generally good for sports, although the sides of some samples show uneven patches or blotches.

Pros: black levels, picture quality

Cons: HDR performance, blooming control

#10 Hisense U75QG
3.0

Dirty-screen effect varies by unit; a few testers saw mild panel dirtiness while others reported cleaner uniformity.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#11 Samsung U8000F
2.8

A mild dirty-screen effect and patchiness are visible in tests, though several reviewers find them less noticeable with real content.

Pros: color accuracy, upscaling quality

Cons: picture quality, sound quality

#12 TCL QM9K
2.8

Dirty screen effect is restrained in some testing but prominent in another large sample, where streaks remain visible on pale images.

Pros: peak brightness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, shadow detail

#13 LG UA77
2.5

One test finds distracting central blotches for sports, while the hands-on 55-inch unit looks comparatively uniform.

Pros: viewing angles, smart TV platform

Cons: overall satisfaction, refresh rate

#14 LG QNED85A
2.5

The center of the panel shows slight unevenness that can become noticeable during sports with broad, uniform backgrounds.

Pros: picture quality, maximum volume

Cons: sound quality, bass performance

#15 Samsung 100QN80F
2.1

Dirty-screen artifacts can distract in sports.

Pros: Large-screen immersion, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, black levels

#16 TCL Q77K
2.0

The tested 75-inch panel showed uneven patches and a pinch mark that could stand out on grass, ice or other broad flat colors.

Pros: picture quality, value for money

Cons: viewing angles, HDR performance

#17 Hisense 98QD5QG
2.0

Darkened edges and a dirty-looking central area can be noticeable over uniform sports fields and other solid colors.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: Weight and handling, black levels

#18 Hisense U8QG
2.0

The 100-inch panel showed obvious central dirty-screen artifacts and patchiness, a concern for pans across uniform backgrounds.

Pros: peak brightness, HDR brightness

Cons: sound quality, viewing angles

#19 Sony BRAVIA 2 II
2.0

Gray uniformity is imperfect, with darker corners and a patchy central area that can be noticeable on broad, even backgrounds.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, reliability