ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV

ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV Monitor Review

Brand: ASUS
Released: June 30, 2023
Updated: 3 hours ago
3.9
Overall review score
108
Review insights
54
Scored features
7
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Excellent out-of-box SDR accuracy, a spacious ultrawide canvas and one-cable laptop docking make this a practical creator display. Modest HDR, 60Hz refresh and shallow blacks limit its appeal beyond that role.

SDR photo and video editors, content creators and laptop-based desk workers who want accurate color, generous horizontal space and built-in docking.

Competitive gamers, HDR-focused creators and buyers who need deep blacks or the finest 4K/5K2K text and image detail.

Verdict

The PA34VCNV makes a persuasive case for creators who want a wide, dependable SDR workspace without paying for a flagship panel. Its factory-calibrated sRGB and Rec.709 performance is a clear strength, and the 34-inch ultrawide format gives photo and video editors more space for tools, timelines and side-by-side windows. USB-C laptop charging, Ethernet, a peripheral hub and DisplayPort daisy-chaining make it particularly practical as a desk centerpiece. The compromises are mostly in image depth and speed: contrast and HDR impact are modest, fine detail is less crisp than on denser 4K or 5K2K monitors, and 60Hz motion is not aimed at competitive games. Speakers are weak, and the wide, heavy cabinet needs room. For color-accurate SDR editing and productive laptop docking, though, it delivers a thoughtfully balanced value.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    22 (41%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    12 (22%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (13%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    12 (22%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    color accuracy: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Excellent factory accuracy is a standout: one measured unit was exceptionally close to target before calibration, with additional gains possible after profiling.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Several assessments find the mix of accurate SDR color, screen space and docking excellent for the money, although one video sees the price as relatively high.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    port selection: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    A broad range of video, USB-C, network and peripheral connectors makes the monitor unusually well equipped for its price class.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    productivity versatility: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    A broad desktop supports multiple applications and long editing timelines; creators particularly appreciate seeing more of the project at once.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    USB-C power delivery: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    High-wattage USB-C power is regularly praised for allowing a connected laptop to charge from the monitor.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    curved screen immersion: 4.3, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    The gentle 3800R curve brings the edges inward without the pronounced wraparound feel of aggressive gaming ultrawides.

Cons highlights

  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    color gamut: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Full sRGB and Rec.709 coverage suits everyday creative work, but DCI-P3 coverage is comparatively modest and limits broader-gamut ambitions.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    black levels: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Blacks lack depth and subtle shadow separation can be harder to judge, especially in darker content.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    contrast: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Contrast is an evident limitation: measured performance is around the usual IPS range, leaving dark material less convincing than on stronger-contrast alternatives.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The 60Hz refresh is fine for productivity but draws criticism for visibly less fluid motion than 120Hz alternatives.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    HDR performance: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    One assessment likes HDR10's added visual range, but more critical testing finds highlights dull and the overall HDR presentation unconvincing.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Content creation: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The monitor is consistently recommended for content creators focused on accurate SDR work and useful laptop connections, rather than flagship HDR performance.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Desktop productivity: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Side-by-side windows, a broad editing canvas and an adjustable stand make everyday computer work comfortable and efficient.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Color-critical work: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Calibrated sRGB and Rec.709 performance make it well suited to color-sensitive SDR projects, with less flexibility for demanding wide-gamut work.

Not ideal for

  • Bright-room viewing
    2.0
    1 review
    Bright-room viewing: 2.0, 1 review
    Dim lamps and average overhead lighting are manageable; direct sunlight or a bright nearby lamp can make the screen hard to see.
  • Portrait orientation
    2.0
    1 review
    Portrait orientation: 2.0, 1 review
    The stand does not pivot into portrait orientation, making this ultrawide a poor fit for vertical-screen layouts.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in port selection, USB hub functionality, USB-C power delivery, near average in screen uniformity, single-player cinematic gaming suitability, below average in refresh rate, Pixel density, contrast.

Comparison summary

54 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    21 (39%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    13 (24%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (37%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
refresh rate 2.0 4.3 -2.3
Pixel density 2.0 4.3 -2.3
contrast 2.0 4.2 -2.2
competitive gaming suitability 1.5 3.7 -2.2
motion clarity 2.0 4.1 -2.1
response time 2.0 4.1 -2.1
portability and weight 2.0 4.0 -2.0
black levels 2.0 3.9 -1.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better competitive gaming suitability

Choose Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for competitive gaming suitability, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better refresh rate

Choose Dell S2725QS. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for refresh rate, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better contrast

Choose Dell U4025QW. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for contrast, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Dell 34 Plus USB-C Monitor - S3425DW

  • Compared: creator accuracy versus gaming motion The ASUS offers better creator accuracy, power delivery and daisy-chaining, while the Dell is faster and has deeper blacks.

ProArt Display PA278CV

  • Alternative: editing workspace size The PA34VCNV trades the PA278CV's smaller traditional format for a wider editing workspace.

ProArt Display PA279CRV

  • Compared: resolution and text sharpness The compared ProArt has sharper 4K text and more HDR gamut, while the PA34VCNV offers more side-by-side workspace.

FAQ

Is the PA34VCNV good for photo editing?

Yes, particularly for sRGB photography. Factory accuracy is excellent and the ultrawide surface offers room for tools, though higher-density monitors are preferable for very fine inspection.

Can it connect and charge a laptop through one cable?

Yes. USB-C provides a display connection, peripheral data and high-wattage laptop charging, with Ethernet also part of the docking setup.

How good is it for video editing?

Its Rec.709 color coverage and broad timeline space make it a strong match for standard SDR video projects. The limited HDR image quality is a drawback for HDR-focused work.

Is it a good gaming monitor?

It can handle slower, immersive games, and adaptive sync works over DisplayPort. The 60Hz refresh and modest response times make it poorly suited to serious competitive gaming.

Does it work well in a bright room?

It is reasonably visible under typical overhead lights, but sunny rooms or strong nearby lamps can cause problems. HDR highlights also lack much impact.

Can it connect a second monitor?

Yes. A DisplayPort output supports daisy-chaining another screen, which can simplify a two-monitor desk.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

rtings.com

The ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV is a 34-inch ultrawide monitor that's geared towards content creators. It uses an IPS panel with a 3440x1440...

Review score
3.6

Top Monitors to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Swift 34 QD-OLED PG34WCDN
4.5

This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.

Pros: color gamut, contrast

Cons: value for money, Resolution

#2 Dell U4025QW
4.4

A huge, sharp ultrawide workspace and unusually capable Thunderbolt dock make the U4025QW outstanding for demanding productivity and editing. Its high price, modest HDR, and imperfect motion handling keep it...

Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, built-in speakers

#3 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
4.4

Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker

#4 ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM
4.4

The 27-inch 4K OLED picture is exceptionally crisp and responsive, with useful USB-C and KVM extras. Its high price, oversized stand, and bright-room compromises limit its appeal.

Pros: sharpness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, VRR flicker