Best 2025 TVs for image processing

#1 Sony BRAVIA 5
5.0

The XR chip is the product's defining strength, making film motion, colors and weaker sources look notably polished.

Pros: picture quality, black levels

Cons: HDR brightness, value for money

#2 Sony BRAVIA 2 II
5.0

Sony's natural-looking image tuning, compression cleanup and detail recovery are the strongest reasons to consider this entry-level set.

Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction

Cons: sound quality, reliability

#3 Hisense U65QF
5.0

Image processing earns unusually strong praise, particularly for AI super-resolution, contrast enhancement, and its ability to keep bright presets from falling apart. The processing is treated as a meaningful advantage...

Pros: overall satisfaction, value for money

Cons: smart TV platform, blooming control

#4 Panasonic Z8BA OLED
5.0

Upscaling and cleanup help older shows and rough streams look impressively clear without losing natural texture.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: size options, value for money

#5 Hisense 98QD5QG
5.0

AI upscaling drew enthusiastic praise for making older shows and games look cleaner.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: Weight and handling, black levels

#6 LG QNED85A
4.5

Vibrant color and crisp-looking imagery are appealing during normal viewing, though the processing claims have not all been confirmed by detailed testing.

Pros: picture quality, maximum volume

Cons: sound quality, bass performance

#7 Sony Bravia 8 II
4.2

Sony’s XR processing is repeatedly singled out as class-leading, producing clean, natural, dimensional images and especially strong low-quality-source cleanup.

Pros: gaming performance, peak brightness

Cons: HDMI 2.1 support, HDMI 2.1 port count

#8 Hisense U75QG
3.7

Image processing has improved and AI controls can add depth and clarity, but results vary and some reviewers still prefer more expensive processors.

Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality

Cons: reliability, build quality

#9 TCL 98QM8K
3.0

Picture processing gives sports, streaming, and high-quality films impressive scale, but motion and fine detail are not equally polished in every mode.

Pros: peak brightness, picture quality

Cons: HDMI 2.1 port count, reflection handling

#10 Samsung QN70F
3.0

Samsung's processing can sharpen cleaner content and control noise, but it does not consistently rescue rough sources or match more expensive sets.

Pros: picture quality, 4K at 144 Hz support

Cons: sound quality, value for money

#11 Samsung U7900F
3.0

Basic scaling and stream cleanup are serviceable; more difficult feeds still expose compression artifacts and softness.

Pros: picture quality, smart TV platform

Cons: value for money, refresh rate

#12 LG StanByMe 2
3.0

LG’s processing features can refine the picture, but the measured benefit is limited by the underlying edge-lit LCD. Dynamic Tone Mapping in particular was described as modest in practice.

Pros: overall satisfaction, portability and versatility

Cons: value for money, menu responsiveness

#13 Samsung 100QN80F
3.0

Huge 4K image looks a little soft up close.

Pros: Large-screen immersion, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, black levels

#14 TCL QM5K
2.5

The TV can render impressive fine detail, but sharpening may look exaggerated and processing becomes less persuasive with poor sources.

Pros: black levels, picture quality

Cons: HDR performance, blooming control

#15 TCL QM9K
2.3

The processor produces excellent-looking high-quality video, but enhancement settings sometimes introduce artifacts or handle brightness inconsistently.

Pros: peak brightness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, shadow detail