Best for judder handling
Samsung 100QN80F
4.8 attribute score
Highest scored product for this attribute based on supporting review evidence.
Best Samsung TVs for judder handling
judder handling Decision Dashboard
Safest pick
Samsung 77S90H OLED
4.5 attribute score
Balances the attribute score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.
Most evidence
Samsung U7900F
6 supporting reviews
Has the broadest review evidence for this attribute.
Best overall product
Samsung S90H
4.5 overall score
Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this attribute.
Movies play without 24p judder.
Pros: Large-screen immersion, overall satisfaction
Cons: value for money, black levels
Film judder is removed reliably across most sources, with a small exception for some European-format signals.
Pros: black levels, contrast ratio
Cons: Dolby Vision support, stutter handling
Most film cadence is handled cleanly.
Pros: black levels, picture quality
Cons: glare resistance, reflection handling
Most sources play with little judder, and careful custom settings smooth pans, though aggressive or automatic processing can introduce artifacts.
Pros: picture quality, contrast ratio
Cons: blooming control, glare resistance
Most film playback is smooth, while difficult pans and test animations can stutter or judder. A small interpolation adjustment may help without overwhelming the image.
Pros: color volume, overall satisfaction
Cons: value for money, color accuracy
Most ordinary camera pans remain acceptably smooth, especially after modest judder-reduction adjustments.
Pros: overall satisfaction, picture quality
Cons: reliability, remote control quality
Most film sources play without major judder, but mismatched 60p playback may need extra settings or show mild micro-judder.
Pros: cable management, design and appearance
Cons: value for money, Dolby Vision support
Most film sources play with correct cadence and little judder, although a few unusual signal conversions can still show uneven motion.
Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction
Cons: design and appearance, Dolby Vision support
Most ordinary viewing looks fine, although some 25 fps material in a 60Hz feed still shows judder.
Pros: picture quality, 4K at 144 Hz support
Cons: sound quality, value for money
Film-based 1080i is processed well in one test, but 60Hz external sources can show noticeable judder.
Pros: picture quality, overall satisfaction
Cons: sound quality, black levels
Film signals and 1080i broadcasts can look smooth, but some cable boxes and 60Hz delivery paths still introduce uneven motion. Interpolation does not reliably resolve every case.
Pros: picture quality, smart TV platform
Cons: value for money, refresh rate
Film-source judder is handled well in some conditions, though sports and default movie settings can still show uneven motion.
Pros: gaming performance, color accuracy
Cons: value for money, overall satisfaction
Native 24p material can play smoothly, but some sources or settings introduce visible judder that requires tuning.
Pros: color accuracy, upscaling quality
Cons: picture quality, sound quality
Judder handling depends heavily on source: native 24p content can be smooth, while 60Hz film signals may judder; other testing finds strong 1080i film compensation.
Pros: sound quality, picture quality
Cons: value for money, local dimming performance
Judder can show up at default settings, but modest custom adjustments clear it up without forcing an overly smoothed look.
Pros: glare resistance, black levels
Cons: Dolby Vision support, color gamut
Common 60Hz feeds can judder, and enabling picture smoothing can actually make motion worse.
Pros: white balance accuracy, design and appearance
Cons: overall satisfaction, value for money