LG 27GX790B-B

LG 27GX790B-B Monitor Review

Brand: LG
Released: January 6, 2026
Updated: 13 minutes ago
4.1
Overall review score
200
Review insights
62
Scored features
12
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

A superb 540Hz OLED for serious competitive gaming, with remarkably clear motion and vivid HDR. The 720Hz mode blurs the image at 720p, while matte-screen quirks and high hardware demands limit its appeal.

Dedicated competitive PC gamers who play high-frame-rate shooters and want the clearest possible fast motion without giving up vibrant OLED contrast.

Casual or budget-focused players, 4K-first single-player fans, and people needing flawless long-session text clarity or laptop charging through a single cable.

Verdict

The LG 27GX790B-B is built for competitive PC gaming where speed matters more than pixel count. At its native 1440p resolution, the 540Hz Tandem OLED panel combines unusually sharp motion, low input lag, deep blacks, and bright HDR highlights. Reviewers also appreciate the adjustable stand, extensive picture controls, and modern connections. The main compromise is the headline 720Hz Dual Mode: dropping to 720p makes images conspicuously softer, and even powerful PCs struggle to feed the display enough frames. The matte coating helps with reflections but some testers prefer the clarity of glossy competitors; one unit also showed distracting gray-screen texture. Office-text comfort and long-term burn-in confidence are less consistent. At a steep discount it can be compelling value for esports enthusiasts; casual gamers and buyers prioritizing 4K sharpness have better-fitting alternatives.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

62 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    28 (45%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (27%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (8%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    competitive gaming suitability: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Serious esports players get exceptionally clear motion and responsive control, especially in lightweight shooters that can run at hundreds of frames per second.
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Native 540Hz QHD feels extraordinarily fluid and crisp. The 720Hz option is less universally useful because it drops to 720p and demands extremely high frame rates.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    motion clarity: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast-moving objects show remarkably little blur or trailing, helping target visibility and making rapid camera movement feel precise.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    color gamut: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The wide color gamut gives games vivid, rich color; color purity is a frequent highlight of the newer Tandem OLED panel.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    A standout specialist for high-frame-rate PC gaming rather than a universally ideal monitor; image compromises and value depend heavily on how you play.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    contrast: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Excellent OLED contrast keeps dark areas black while bright highlights pop, especially in atmospheric games.

Cons highlights

  • 2.9
    9 reviews low consensus
    Dual-mode versatility: 2.9, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Switching between 540Hz QHD and 720Hz HD creates choice, but several testers found the softer 720p image too costly for the modest speed benefit.
  • 2.1
    7 reviews strong consensus
    GPU demands: 2.1, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Even expensive gaming systems often fall well short of 540–720 fps in modern games, restricting the benefit of the highest modes.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Resolution: 2.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Native 1440p looks good at 27 inches, but enabling 720Hz reduces the image to a very soft 720p; detail-focused buyers may want 4K.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    At a steep discount, its 540Hz OLED performance compares favorably with pricier rivals; at full price, many gamers can spend far less without giving up much.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Screen coating clarity: 2.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The matte coating cuts reflections but looks less crisp and punchy than glossy rivals to some viewers; preferences are sharply divided.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    cable management: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Some testers miss an opening through the stand, although one found the included rear clip effective for bundling cables.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    HDR gaming: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fast gaming can still look rich and high-contrast, combining bright HDR effects with responsive OLED motion.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Mixed work-and-play setups: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Clean styling and an adjustable stand help the monitor work at a desk by day and in games by night, although text rendering impressions differ.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Dark-room viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    A dim room gives the deep OLED blacks room to shine without fighting strong reflections.

Not ideal for

  • Casual gaming
    2.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Casual gaming: 2.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The panel looks good for ordinary play, but its costly extreme refresh rates are largely wasted without competitive goals and high frame rates.
  • Single-cable laptop docking
    2.0
    1 review
    Single-cable laptop docking: 2.0, 1 review
    USB-C can carry laptop video, but its 5W power delivery is too weak to serve as a useful charging dock.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in Headphone output quality, competitive gaming suitability, ghosting control, near average in color gamut, USB hub functionality, below average in USB-C power delivery, Integrated power supply, warranty and support service.

Comparison summary

59 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    25 (42%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (25%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    19 (32%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
USB-C power delivery 1.0 3.8 -2.8
Headphone output quality 5.0 2.6 +2.4
Integrated power supply 2.0 4.1 -2.1
warranty and support service 2.0 3.8 -1.8
Resolution 2.6 4.3 -1.7
competitive gaming suitability 4.9 3.4 +1.4
USB port accessibility 3.0 4.6 -1.6
Screen coating clarity 2.5 3.8 -1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better USB-C power delivery

Choose TCL 32R84. It scores 4.3 vs 1.0 for USB-C power delivery, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better warranty and support service

Choose Dell Alienware AW2725DF. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for warranty and support service, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better cable management

Choose HyperX OMEN OLED 27q. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for cable management, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: Brightness and speed versus color accuracy LG leads in refresh and brightness; Alienware has punchier colors and better accuracy.
  • Alternative: Ultrawide immersion The Alienware offers a very different ultrawide experience at a similar list price.

FAQ

What refresh rates does it support?

It runs up to 540Hz at its native 2560×1440 resolution, or up to 720Hz at 1280×720 in Dual Mode.

Is 720Hz worth using?

Usually only for extremely competitive play. Several reviewers found 720p too blurry to justify the increase over already-fast 540Hz QHD.

Does it need a very powerful PC?

Yes, if you want to approach its highest frame-rate modes. Even high-end test systems struggled to reach 540fps in demanding games.

How good is the HDR picture?

Deep OLED blacks and unusually bright highlights make HDR attractive, though overbrightening and the matte finish can compromise accuracy or visual punch.

Is it good for work and reading text?

Results are mixed: some found desktop text crisp and comfortable, while others noticed fringing or texture. Static-image use also raises OLED burn-in considerations.

Is the screen glossy or matte?

It has a matte anti-glare coating. That helps with reflections but looks less clear or vivid than glossy OLEDs to some reviewers.

Does it work well with consoles?

It has HDMI 2.1 connections, and one reviewer enjoyed smooth PS5 Pro gaming. Its ultra-high refresh capabilities are chiefly beneficial to gaming PCs.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Monitors to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Swift 34 QD-OLED PG34WCDN
4.5

This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.

Pros: color gamut, contrast

Cons: value for money, Resolution

#2 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
4.4

Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker

#3 ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM
4.4

The 27-inch 4K OLED picture is exceptionally crisp and responsive, with useful USB-C and KVM extras. Its high price, oversized stand, and bright-room compromises limit its appeal.

Pros: sharpness, overall satisfaction

Cons: value for money, VRR flicker

#4 MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24
4.4

Best for exceptional 4K HDR, accurate color, fast 240Hz gaming, and strong work connectivity. Skip it if you need built-in speakers, ultrawide immersion, television-level HDR brightness, or a budget-friendly upgrade.

Pros: brightness, reflection handling

Cons: cable management