Best 2025 Video Games for puzzle design

#1 Ninja Gaiden: Ragebound
4.8

Demon-world routes mix movement with switches, teleporting, and a dwindling timer. These compact puzzles are usually praised for rewarding a well-planned route without overwhelming the action.

Pros: overall quality, difficulty balance

Cons: frame rate stability, performance optimization

#2 Split Fiction
4.8

Puzzle design was consistently praised for co-op dependence, teamwork, and creativity, with only occasional simplicity noted.

Pros: co-op experience, content variety

Cons: writing quality, narrative quality

#3 BALL x PIT
4.8

Town layouts offer a satisfying spatial puzzle built around harvest routes, construction targets, and efficient rebounds. Players who enjoy calculating angles can find the surface almost as absorbing as the...

Pros: fun factor, upgrade system

Cons: user interface design, grind level

#4 Goodnight Universe
4.5

Puzzle design received praise in limited evidence, especially for a psychic-camera sequence that felt fun and surprisingly challenging.

Pros: narrative quality, emotional impact

Cons: controls responsiveness, platform-specific feature support

#5 Hollow Knight: Silksong
4.5

Puzzle design receives limited but positive evidence, with one review saying Silksong makes puzzle-solving and hidden-path discovery feel effortless.

Pros: difficulty balance, art direction

Cons: economy and resource balance, checkpoint system

#6 Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl
4.5

Anomalies occasionally function as enjoyable environmental puzzles that reward observation and experimentation. Their best moments turn hazards into problems to solve rather than simple damage zones.

Pros: immersion, fun factor

Cons: bug frequency, AI behavior

#7 Anno 117: Pax Romana
4.3

Layout and logistics repeatedly turn into satisfying spatial puzzles, as players juggle building effects, production chains, and efficient neighborhood design.

Pros: fun factor, graphics quality

Cons: learning curve, bug frequency

#8 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.3

Puzzle design was often praised for clever material interactions and challenge rooms, but several reviewers felt some puzzles were too easy, bypassable, or constrained.

Pros: fun factor, world interactivity

Cons: frame rate stability, boss design

#9 Marathon
4.3

Cryo Archive’s vaults and endgame spaces add meaningful puzzle-solving to the extraction formula. The puzzle-heavy design is praised for depth, though some random elements can undermine a clean solution.

Pros: fun factor, loot system

Cons: difficulty balance, quest design

#10 Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater
4.2

One review praised each section as a puzzle-like stealth space where guards, terrain, and limited gear create solvable challenges.

Pros: remake/remaster quality, graphics quality

Cons: performance optimization, frame rate stability

#11 The Outer Worlds 2
4.2

Puzzle support was praised where gadgets expanded both combat and puzzle-solving options.

Pros: combat system, progression system

Cons: pacing, AI behavior

#12 Silent Hill f
4.2

Puzzle design was broadly a strength, with many reviewers praising clever, thematic, challenging puzzles, though some found certain clues obtuse, culturally unclear, or overlong.

Pros: puzzle design, narrative quality

Cons: combat system, enemy variety

#13 Atomfall
4.0

Puzzle evidence was limited but positive, focused on the Interchange and its light energy-routing puzzles that kept exploration engaged.

Pros: narrative quality, exploration quality

Cons: combat system, AI behavior

#14 Pokémon Legends: Z-A
4.0

Puzzle evidence centered on rooftop route-finding, which one reviewer found meaningfully puzzle-like within Lumiose traversal.

Pros: combat system, exploration quality

Cons: graphics quality, voice acting

#15 Shinobi: Art of Vengeance
4.0

Puzzle design receives a mild positive note for being logical and not slowing the action down.

Pros: combat system, faithfulness to franchise

Cons: narrative quality, frame rate stability

#16 Metroid Prime 4: Beyond
3.9

Puzzles were generally satisfying and boss-like, though psychic mechanics were sometimes called familiar or clunky.

Pros: boss design, graphics quality

Cons: open-world design, side character depth

#17 Avowed
3.7

Puzzles were generally light but appreciated when they used environmental elements, timing, and exploration paths.

Pros: combat system, narrative quality

Cons: difficulty balance, enemy variety

#18 Lego Voyagers
3.6

Puzzle design drew the widest split: many praised cooperative, elegant, rewarding ideas, while others found bridge-building repetitive or underwhelming.

Pros: co-op experience, puzzle design

Cons: controls responsiveness, replay value

#19 Doom: The Dark Ages
3.5

Puzzle design was lightly covered, with reviewers describing simple exploration puzzles as enjoyable but rarely demanding.

Pros: combat system, weapon balance

Cons: flying mechanics, narrative quality

#20 The Alters
3.5

Puzzle evidence was mixed: environmental puzzles earned praise, but the probe-based resource puzzle was criticized as fiddly and low-value.

Pros: narrative quality, replay value

Cons: difficulty balance, pacing

#21 Arc Raiders
3.5

The one puzzle-related event mention was positive but limited, describing it as a nice diversion that needs more support.

Pros: sound design, combat system

Cons: voice acting, menu usability

#22 Fantasy Life i: The Girl Who Steals Time
3.5

Puzzle design is light but useful as part of open-area exploration and adventure variety.

Pros: core gameplay loop, narrative quality

Cons: crafting system, multiplayer design

#23 Cronos: The New Dawn
3.4

Puzzle design drew mixed responses: several praised time and environmental puzzles as a good break from combat, while others found them simple, padded, or underdeveloped.

Pros: combat system, narrative quality

Cons: boss design, puzzle design

#24 Plants vs. Zombies: Replanted
3.3

Vasebreaker, I, Zombie, and the mini-game twists remain clever breaks from standard lane defense. The classic puzzles are widely enjoyed, although some returning players wish Replanted had added more genuinely...

Pros: fun factor, remake/remaster quality

Cons: graphics quality, soundtrack quality

#25 Tales of Xillia Remastered
3.3

Puzzle and dungeon interactions draw mixed reactions: some reviewers appreciate the occasional environmental tasks, while others criticize the game for lacking substantial traditional puzzles.

Pros: combat system, remake/remaster quality

Cons: animation quality, environmental detail

#26 Dispatch
3.2

Hacking is divisive: some find it fun, rewarding, and appropriately challenging, while many others call it the weakest or most repetitive part of the game.

Pros: choice impact, narrative quality

Cons: gameplay mechanics, QTE design

#27 Marvel’s Deadpool VR
2.8

Puzzles are mostly light diversions rather than deep challenges. Some are fun and quick, but reviewers often describe them as simple VR busywork with little complexity.

Pros: combat system, voice acting

Cons: pacing, boss design

#28 Lost Records: Bloom & Rage
2.7

Puzzle design was mixed to negative: a few simple puzzles were praised for the right complexity, but multiple reviews wanted more depth or found specific puzzles clunky.

Pros: narrative quality, character development

Cons: pacing, gameplay mechanics

#29 Borderlands 4
2.5

Puzzle design has limited evidence, but one puzzle-like ground-pound interaction was criticized as confusing when the game fails to explain it.

Pros: movement feel, loot system

Cons: performance optimization, narrative quality

#30 Little Nightmares III
2.5

Puzzle design split reviewers sharply but leaned negative overall: some praised clarity or co-op richness, while many found puzzles obvious, repetitive, or overly simple.

Pros: atmosphere, faithfulness to franchise

Cons: puzzle design, co-op experience

#31 South of Midnight
2.1

Puzzle design drew consistent criticism for being too easy, overly guided, or lacking meaningful problem-solving.

Pros: soundtrack quality, narrative quality

Cons: combat system, enemy variety

#32 Ghost of Yōtei
1.5

Puzzle design receives a low score from a reviewer who calls several puzzles overly simple and almost pointless.

Pros: combat system, narrative quality

Cons: grind level, innovation