If you want better save system reliability
Choose Fatal Frame II: Crimson Butterfly Remake. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for save system reliability, with a 3.8 overall score.
Little Nightmares III Review
Bottom Line
Choose Little Nightmares III for eerie environments, strong sound design, and online co-op with a friend. Skip it if you need couch co-op, inventive puzzles, tight platforming, or a sequel that advances the formula.
Best for
Best for series fans or horror-puzzle players who value mood, grotesque environments, and sound-led tension more than mechanical novelty. It is especially suitable for players who can use online co-op and do not need local play.
Not for
Not for players expecting couch co-op, deep puzzle experimentation, smooth platforming precision, or a sequel that meaningfully reinvents the first two games. It also may frustrate solo players sensitive to AI mistakes or unclear navigation.
Verdict
Little Nightmares III is most convincing as an audiovisual return to Nowhere: reviewers repeatedly praised its art direction, environmental detail, atmosphere, and sound design. The tradeoff is that the new co-op focus rarely delivers the mechanical leap many expected. Online play and Friend Pass support help, but the lack of couch co-op, limited teamwork, simple puzzles, clunky platforming, uneven AI, and familiar structure kept many reviews from seeing it as a true evolution. A few outlets found it satisfying, tightly paced, and faithful, while harsher reviews called it hollow, repetitive, or unfinished. The result is a recognizable, often beautiful sequel whose best moments are mood and spectacle rather than fresh play.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
67 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.06 (9%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.414 (21%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.422 (33%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.424 (36%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (1%)
Pros highlights
-
Atmosphere was widely praised for menace, mood, and tension, though a few reviews felt co-op or frustration weakened it.
-
Faithfulness to franchise was mixed but often positive: reviewers agreed it looks and feels like Little Nightmares, while some felt it fell short of prior entries.
-
Art direction was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly praised as fantastic, phenomenal, breathtaking, or visually distinctive.
-
Environmental detail was generally praised for rich, vivid, or meticulously realized spaces, though one reviewer found some rooms empty or uninteresting.
-
Sound design was strongly praised for syncing with art, building tension, and enhancing atmosphere.
-
Performance optimization was generally positive, with multiple reviewers reporting smooth or consistent performance and no major issues.
Cons highlights
-
Puzzle design split reviewers sharply but leaned negative overall: some praised clarity or co-op richness, while many found puzzles obvious, repetitive, or overly simple.
-
Co-op experience was heavily discussed and mixed: several reviewers enjoyed shared puzzle tension, but many felt co-op was underused, burdensome, or tension-draining.
-
Companion AI was one of the most divided areas: some reviewers found it competent or responsive, while others said it caused deaths, waiting, or frustration.
-
Pacing was divisive: some reviewers liked the tight or smoother flow, but many cited repetition, a weak first half, abrupt ending, or hollow stretches.
-
Couch co-op quality was consistently criticized because reviewers repeatedly called the lack of local/couch co-op a missed or baffling opportunity.
-
Narrative quality was mixed to negative overall, with recurring complaints about slight, disjointed, ambiguous, or abrupt storytelling despite a few positive reads.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in platform-specific feature support, load times, haptic feedback integration, near average in companion AI, art direction, below average in soundtrack quality, couch co-op quality, world interactivity.
Comparison summary
67 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher12 (18%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts7 (10%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower48 (72%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| soundtrack quality | 1.5 | 4.3 | -2.8 |
| couch co-op quality | 1.5 | 4.0 | -2.4 |
| world interactivity | 1.5 | 3.9 | -2.4 |
| cross-play support | 1.5 | 3.8 | -2.3 |
| split-screen quality | 1.5 | 3.7 | -2.2 |
| gameplay mechanics | 2.3 | 4.1 | -1.8 |
| save system reliability | 1.0 | 3.0 | -2.0 |
| multiplayer design | 1.8 | 3.7 | -1.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better couch co-op quality
Choose It Takes Two. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for couch co-op quality, with a 4.5 overall score.
If you want better gameplay mechanics
Choose Pokémon Legends: Z-A. It scores 4.8 vs 2.3 for gameplay mechanics, with a 3.5 overall score.
If you want better value for money
Choose Saros. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for value for money, with a 4.3 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: couch co-op expectation The reviewer cites It Takes Two as proof that fans love couch-style multiplayer the game lacks.
- Better: co-op alternative The reviewer recommends other co-op titles like It Takes Two over this if players are unsure.
- Similar: Friend Pass system The Friend Pass is favorably likened to the single-copy online access seen in It Takes Two.
- Similar: Friend Pass system The Friend Pass is also likened to Split Fiction’s single-copy co-op access.
- Better: co-operative game design The reviewer says Little Nightmares 3 cannot match Split Fiction’s co-op innovation.
- Better: single-screen co-op The reviewer uses Split Fiction as another example showing split-screen co-op should have worked here.
Little Nightmares 2
- Better: flashlight horror sequence The reviewer says Little Nightmares 3 lacks anything as terrifying as a flashlight sequence from Little Nightmares 2.
- Better: ending impact The ending is judged weaker than Little Nightmares 2’s more forceful finale.
FAQ
Is Little Nightmares III good for co-op?
Reviews were mixed. Some found online co-op satisfying and atmospheric, but many felt teamwork was underused and the lack of couch co-op was a major missed opportunity.
Can you play Little Nightmares III solo?
Yes, but the AI partner divided reviewers. Some called it competent, while others reported glitches, delays, or moments where the AI caused frustration.
Are the puzzles challenging?
Most reviews described the puzzles as simple, obvious, or repetitive, though a few praised clearer layouts or the richer feel of two-character problem solving.
Is Little Nightmares III scary?
The atmosphere and chase sequences impressed several reviewers, but others said it was less scary, less tense, or less memorable than earlier entries.
Does it feel like a Little Nightmares game?
Generally, yes. Many reviews said the look, sound, and mood fit the franchise, even when they criticized it for being too familiar or too safe.
Is Little Nightmares III worth the price?
Value opinions were mixed. Friend Pass and the lower price helped some reviewers, but short length, paid extra chapters, and sale recommendations were recurring caveats.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
theaureview.com
- Review score
- 3.6
eurogamer.net
- Review score
- 3.0
empireonline.com
- Review score
- 2.9
Top Video Games to Consider
Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.
Pros: difficulty balance, boss design
Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom
Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...
Pros: combat system, progression system
Cons: originality
Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...
Pros: town-building system, exploration quality
Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience
Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.
Pros: fun factor, world interactivity
Cons: frame rate stability, boss design