Order of the Sinking Star

Order of the Sinking Star Feature Scores

Explore all 73 feature scores for Order of the Sinking Star, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

73 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    25 (34%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    29 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (5%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (3%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    26 reviews strong consensus
    content variety: 4.9, 26 reviews, strong consensus
    Four distinct puzzle systems and their combinations create an unusually broad range of challenges. A few players still find prolonged stretches within one region repetitive.
  • 4.8
    36 reviews strong consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.8, 36 reviews, strong consensus
    Simple pushing, pulling, teleporting, and other abilities grow into richly interwoven systems. Their cross-world interactions are the game’s most widely admired creative strength.
  • 4.7
    37 reviews strong consensus
    puzzle design: 4.7, 37 reviews, strong consensus
    Clever, meticulously constructed puzzles consistently earn high praise, especially when rules collide. Criticism focuses on rejected alternative solutions, weaker regional sets, and occasional overcomplication.
  • 4.8
    19 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 4.8, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Instant undo, reset, and time controls are among the most consistently praised features. They encourage experimentation and make mistaken moves easy to recover from.
  • 4.4
    38 reviews moderate consensus
    overall quality: 4.4, 38 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most accounts recommend it strongly to dedicated puzzle fans, with several calling it a masterpiece. Fatigue, fragmented storytelling, and uneven technical results keep the recommendation conditional for others.
  • 4.4
    25 reviews strong consensus
    learning curve: 4.4, 25 reviews, strong consensus
    Puzzles often teach through carefully staged interactions and increasingly useful lessons. Abrupt complexity, forgotten rules, and understated explanations can still cause confusion.
  • 4.5
    16 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 4.5, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Successful solutions can deliver immense satisfaction and make players feel brilliantly capable. Long sessions and repeated roadblocks can instead leave them mentally drained.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Restrained, soothing music supports long periods of thought, with some accounts praising its orchestral variety and adaptive fading. It often provides welcome calm during frustrating puzzles.
  • 4.3
    28 reviews moderate consensus
    fun factor: 4.3, 28 reviews, moderate consensus
    Many players describe an absorbing one-more-puzzle loop that keeps them returning. The same prolonged challenge leaves others bored, weary, or frustrated.
  • 4.4
    22 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.4, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    Colorful fantasy regions, painterly scenery, and carefully styled floors draw widespread praise. A few players find the world too busy or the characters visually disconnected from their surroundings.
  • 4.3
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    open-world design: 4.3, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    Freedom to change regions helps players manage difficult puzzles, and the overworld itself adds further challenges. Its sheer scale and required travel feel unwieldy or unengaging to some.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    endgame content: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The first credits open the door to further discoveries and more ambitious combinations. Players who enjoy deeper mysteries find this continuation especially rewarding.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    exploration quality: 4.6, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Uncovering the map and recognizing hidden world puzzles can rival the pleasure of solving individual rooms. A less enthusiastic account finds newly opened routes bland.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    world interactivity: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Applying learned abilities to the overworld adds another rewarding layer of puzzling. The larger map can become a meaningful challenge in its own right.
  • 4.3
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    sandbox freedom: 4.3, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Choosing another route helps many players recover from frustration and find fresh ideas. Freedom within individual solutions is less consistent, with some accounts criticizing strict acceptance rules.
  • 4.2
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    progression system: 4.2, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    Numerous available routes usually offer a way forward when one puzzle blocks progress. Global stalls, unclear intermediate progress, and dependencies on other regions can still break the flow.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews low consensus
    innovation: 4.5, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Many accounts admire the sustained invention produced by combining different puzzle languages. A dissenting first impression finds the game insufficiently fresh beside newer Sokoban adventures.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    sound design: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Ambient details, footsteps, block movement, and rewind sounds receive warm praise. Audio feedback helps the world feel tactile and pleasant to inhabit.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews low consensus
    originality: 4.4, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Several players find the fusion of puzzle systems unlike anything they have played. One first impression argues that familiar freeware foundations and newer genre rivals weaken its novelty.
  • 4.2
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    fast travel convenience: 4.2, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The miniature version of the map is widely appreciated as a clever shortcut. Its usefulness varies with route and familiarity, and some backtracking remains cumbersome.
  • 4.0
    15 reviews low consensus
    voice acting: 4.0, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Human performances generally add considerable charm and personality, sometimes earning exceptional praise. Regional unevenness and temporary prerelease voices explain several less favorable experiences.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    save system reliability: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Preserving puzzle positions and action history makes it easy to resume after exploring elsewhere. Positive accounts find this continuity reassuring.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The large puzzle collection at roughly $30 is widely viewed as excellent value. A player who cannot overcome its unsupported difficulty finds the same purchase hard to justify.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    onboarding experience: 4.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The immediate opening and recommended northern route can make getting started pleasantly direct. Some demo impressions nevertheless find the early hook weak.
  • 4.0
    14 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 4.0, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Colorful environments and attractive detail earn substantial praise, including at low Steam Deck settings. Busy screens, small objects, and underwhelming resolution trouble some players.
  • 4.3
    5 reviews low consensus
    level design: 4.3, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Lean, purposeful layouts make small details matter and can subtly guide solutions. Large connected sections are less forgiving when one mistake forces broad repetition.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    atmosphere: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Calm scenery and restrained audio can make exploration feel almost therapeutic. The soothing presentation provides a welcome counterweight to demanding puzzles.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    checkpoint system: 4.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Remembered puzzle positions make leaving and returning convenient. Long interconnected sections can still demand extensive repetition when a full reset becomes necessary.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews low consensus
    performance optimization: 3.9, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Some PC and PS5 tests report flawless play, while Steam Deck runs well with lower settings. Switch 2 results range from impressive to severely troubled, and demo improvements do not establish final performance.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    casting choices: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The voice ensemble earns praise for its strength and range. Familiar names are valued for the personality they bring to the cast.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    handheld play suitability: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Short puzzle sessions suit portable play well, and positive Switch 2 and Steam Deck accounts find it easy to keep chipping away. Performance compromises and inconsistent platform experiences remain caveats.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    tutorial quality: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Teaching through simple introductory puzzles is generally praised for being organic and effective. The game expects players to infer rules and carry those lessons forward.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    load times: 4.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Immediate starts and instant puzzle restarts receive praise. One PC experience instead reports an unresponsive black screen during launch.
  • 3.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    map and navigation design: 3.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Zoom levels, puzzle previews, and distinct regional styling generally help orientation. Finding a specific abandoned puzzle or understanding boundaries between connected sections can still be difficult.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    environmental detail: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fine textures, decorative flourishes, and carefully designed objects give the fantasy spaces a strong visual identity.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual effects quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sparkling beams, flames, and character abilities create attractive lighting and satisfying visual feedback.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    polish: 3.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Cohesive presentation and purposeful construction impress many players. Prerelease voice and subtitle work, plus substantial Switch 2 defects in some tests, complicate that impression.
  • 3.6
    20 reviews low consensus
    game length: 3.6, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The enormous collection is a welcome long-term project for dedicated solvers. Others feel the scope delays major payoffs or turns progress into an exhausting commitment.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews low consensus
    core gameplay loop: 3.9, 4 reviews, low consensus
    For enthusiasts, another block-pushing puzzle is an inviting reason to keep playing. For others, the same central activity becomes routine despite changing mechanics.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    animation quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Expressive, readable movement generally adds personality without obscuring the puzzles. One prerelease account found some animations conspicuously awkward.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lore depth: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    World mysteries and character lore motivate some players to persist. The scattered delivery can make interesting fragments difficult to organize.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    co-op experience: 5.0, 1 review
    Thinking through puzzles with a partner can create memorable shared breakthroughs. This praise concerns informal collaboration around a single-player game.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    couch co-op quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Sharing solutions on the couch can deepen appreciation for the puzzles, especially when rewind lets one person demonstrate their reasoning. No dedicated co-op mode is established by this account.
  • 3.5
    11 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.5, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Some players become invested in the characters through their conversations and distinctive limitations. Others find the snippets too scattered, dull, or brief to build much attachment.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    movement feel: 3.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Clear movement and easy block manipulation are appreciated. Another account reports occasional unwanted nudges from character momentum.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    camera behavior: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Zooming out helps with planning across connected puzzle screens. The fixed grid perspective can also feel monotonous to players wanting more visual variety.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    character roster: 4.5, 1 review
    The ensemble of fantasy workers, explorers, and a talking boat makes the adventure feel personable and varied.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    content completeness: 4.5, 1 review
    The stated absence of a season pass reassures a demo player who prefers the content included in one purchase.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    death mechanics: 4.5, 1 review
    Rewinding after a death makes recovery forgiving and keeps the focus on trying another solution.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    marketing accuracy: 4.5, 1 review
    Clear disclosure that some demo voices were temporary earns approval for its honesty.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    monetization fairness: 4.5, 1 review
    A demo player welcomes the stated pay-once approach rather than dividing the experience into a season pass.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    choice impact: 4.0, 1 review
    A demo-based account welcomes the stated influence of play order on how the story unfolds, while leaving the full payoff untested.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    humor: 4.0, 1 review
    Natural banter brings welcome levity to otherwise tense situations, though its frequency can be excessive in the northern region.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    protagonist appeal: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The Queen is compelling in one full-game account, while a demo impression partly agrees that she lacks charisma early on.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.3
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    writing quality: 2.3, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Opinions range from approval of a strong script to criticism of generic, verbose, or confusing lines. Thin context and scattered delivery frequently weaken the writing’s impact.
  • 2.3
    8 reviews low consensus
    user interface design: 2.3, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Zoom tools help with larger puzzles, but small visuals and the lack of convenient story-reference menus draw complaints. One Switch 2 account also strongly dislikes the interface’s appearance.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    localization support: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Prerelease subtitles draw criticism for typos, missing lines, and mismatches with spoken dialogue. These faults make conversations harder to follow.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    generative AI concerns: 1.0, 1 review
    A prerelease account strongly dislikes the artificial voices used alongside human performers. The complaint concerns temporary voice work described as awaiting replacement.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 1.0, 1 review
    One Switch 2 test reports a docked-display defect severe enough to prevent television play. That platform-specific failure materially limits flexibility in that build.
  • 2.6
    10 reviews low consensus
    hint system: 2.6, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Some players value being left to discover answers independently. More often, missing optional hints or excessively cryptic clues make difficult roadblocks harder to tolerate.
  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    frame rate stability: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Results vary sharply by platform and account. Several Switch 2 tests report substantial dips, one finds mostly 60 fps, and Steam Deck and PS5 reports also include occasional or significant drops.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    battery life: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Handheld power use is a concern, particularly in the overworld. Steam Deck and Switch 2 accounts describe heavier battery drain than expected for this style of puzzler.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    accessibility options: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Quiet presentation can aid concentration, but color-coded beams and subtle secondary cues may create difficulties for players with color-vision differences. Optional guidance is also a recurring accessibility concern.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    immersion: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Expressive animation and an appealing sense of place draw some players into the world. Others feel the hub and unfinished voices create distance from the adventure.
  • 2.9
    11 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.9, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Enjoyable banter and moments of levity coexist with complaints about verbose, stilted, or distracting exchanges. Delivery in small fragments can make context difficult to retain.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    menu usability: 2.5, 1 review
    One PC account finds the lack of a conventional main menu awkward, especially when looking for options before play.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    crash stability: 2.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    One PC account reports no crashes, but another experiences random failures during launch. A Switch 2 account also includes crashes among its technical frustrations.
  • 3.0
    16 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.0, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Bite-sized rooms and time controls suit short sessions and reduce waiting. Constant escalation, slow story beats, and long stretches before major revelations can erode momentum.
  • 3.1
    33 reviews low consensus
    narrative quality: 3.1, 33 reviews, low consensus
    The layered mystery becomes compelling for some players, especially as worlds and characters connect. Others find it thin, distant, or too fragmented to motivate the lengthy journey.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    world-building: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Distinct environments and regional identities help the fantasy worlds feel coherent. One account finds the collaboration theme undermined by contradictions surrounding the project.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    bug frequency: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Several PC and PS5 experiences are clean, while others encounter minor bugs or startup trouble. Switch 2 reports include rewind errors and a severe docked-display glitch in one test.
  • 3.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    side character depth: 3.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Personable performances and meaningful interactions make the supporting cast memorable for some. Others find their fragmented stories or exchanges insufficiently engaging.
  • 3.4
    32 reviews moderate consensus
    difficulty balance: 3.4, 32 reviews, moderate consensus
    The challenge creates powerful breakthroughs for patient puzzle fans, but can become exhausting or demoralizing. Opinions differ on whether its complexity teaches new thinking or overloads memory and execution.