LG 27GX704A-B

LG 27GX704A-B Monitor Review

Brand: LG
Released: September 27, 2025
Updated: 3 hours ago
4.1
Overall review score
249
Review insights
81
Scored features
13
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

The LG 27GX704A-B delivers standout glossy OLED clarity, inky blacks and effortless 240Hz gaming at attractive sale prices. Mirror-like glare, fuzzy text and reported PS5 HDMI handshake problems limit its versatility.

PC and PS5 gamers who prioritize responsive 1440p OLED visuals and strong contrast, especially when they can control direct room reflections. Discount shoppers upgrading from LCD benefit the most.

People spending most of the day reading code or spreadsheets, users with sensitive eyes, and anyone placing the screen opposite bright windows. Buyers who need USB-C docking or effortless PS5 input switching should be cautious.

Verdict

The LG 27GX704A-B is a compelling entry into glossy OLED gaming. At 27 inches and 1440p, its 240Hz WOLED panel offers outstanding motion clarity, responsive controls, deep blacks and crisp, low-haze image quality. Many owners and testers especially appreciate how well its blacks hold up with room lights on, and sale pricing makes the package easier to recommend. It also brings full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 and a flexible stand. There are real compromises, though: glossy reflections can become distracting near windows, the WOLED subpixel structure makes text look fuzzy, and newer Tandem OLED or QD-OLED rivals deliver more saturated HDR color. HDR presets can also clip detail or appear dull, depending on the source. A long-term owner reported persistent PS5 signal detection failures and a sometimes unresponsive OSD joystick. For gaming-first buyers willing to manage lighting, its strengths are considerable; text-heavy office work is less persuasive.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

81 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    38 (47%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (20%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    14 (17%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    13 (16%)

Pros highlights

  • 5.0
    10 reviews strong consensus
    overall satisfaction: 5.0, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Owners and testers are largely enthusiastic about the exceptional gaming picture and sale-price value. Persistent HDMI handshake trouble and office-use compromises remain important.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    At sale prices around $380–$500, the glossy 240Hz OLED package gets strong value praise. Its higher launch pricing looks less competitive beside newer models.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    motion clarity: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Rapid motion and moving targets look exceptionally sharp, particularly at high refresh rates. A low-frame-rate user anecdote flags stutter sensitivity.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    PC gaming compatibility: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    A high-refresh OLED with exceptionally clear motion and deep blacks makes PC gaming the primary strength. The 240Hz panel keeps action responsive.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Screen coating clarity: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The glossy coating is a standout: crisp, low-haze images look substantially cleaner than older matte WOLED finishes.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    brightness: 4.3, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    OLED brightness is strong in many games and HDR highlights, but not consistently the brightest among newer Tandem OLED screens. Strong direct light can still overwhelm visibility.

Cons highlights

  • 2.5
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    reflection handling: 2.5, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The crisp glossy surface also reflects windows and lights clearly. Daytime usability depends heavily on screen position and light control.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    screen uniformity: 3.3, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Some faint vertical/gray banding and mesh texture can appear on test patterns. One owner found the issue barely noticeable in normal use.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    Display-mode switching reliability: 1.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    One owner repeatedly encountered a blank PS5 HDMI signal until restarting the display; console modes can also require manual selection for 4K/120Hz.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Text fringing: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The WOLED subpixel layout can put colored edges around letters and make them look fuzzy. ClearType helps but does not fully match IPS text.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    on-screen display usability: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A bottom-center joystick works in open setups but becomes hard to reach with another screen underneath. A later owner found wake activation less responsive.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    VRR flicker: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Flicker sometimes appears when refresh rates fluctuate in dark scenes or even when moving windows; it is not constant in most fast-paced games.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Sale pricing makes premium-looking OLED gaming comparatively accessible, though the original higher price changes the value equation.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Movies and streaming: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Deep blacks and bright colors make films, streaming video and high-production-value YouTube content especially impressive.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Upgrading from an LCD gaming monitor: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The switch from IPS or conventional LCD brings much better black depth, color impact, and motion clarity, especially in dark games.

Not ideal for

  • USB-C laptop docking
    1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    USB-C laptop docking: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    No USB-C video input makes one-cable laptop docking impossible and reduces appeal for laptop-centric desks.
  • Dual-monitor setups
    2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dual-monitor setups: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Stacked monitor arrangements can block the bottom-mounted joystick and require moving the second display to change settings.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in Pixel defect control, Image retention, Content aspect-ratio support, near average in overall picture quality, color gamut, below average in Screen bezel design, Text fringing, on-screen display usability.

Comparison summary

79 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    40 (51%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    12 (15%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    27 (34%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Pixel defect control 5.0 2.3 +2.8
Screen bezel design 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Text fringing 1.7 3.8 -2.1
Image retention 5.0 2.9 +2.1
on-screen display usability 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Content aspect-ratio support 5.0 3.0 +2.0
PWM flicker comfort 2.0 3.8 -1.8
setup ease 3.0 4.7 -1.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better Screen bezel design

Choose LG 27GX790A-B. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Screen bezel design, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better on-screen display usability

Choose Dell Alienware AW2725DF. It scores 4.4 vs 2.0 for on-screen display usability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: brightness in specific scenes The older WOLED sometimes measures brighter in select scenes, but its newer sibling is generally brighter.
  • Better: launch price versus specification value At launch, the 27GX704A sat only $50 below the more capable 27GX700A.
  • Alternative: brightness, color, stand, coating Tandem OLED is brighter and more vivid; the LG glossy sibling wins clarity and ergonomics but reflects more light.
  • Alternative: higher refresh, color and HDMI bandwidth The Alienware alternative is faster and more colorful but lacks the LG’s full HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
  • Worse: bright-room contrast and HDMI 2.1 The LG is favored in illuminated rooms and for HDMI 2.1 connections; the Dell offers QD-OLED color purity.

FAQ

Is the LG 27GX704A-B good for competitive gaming?

Yes. Its 240Hz refresh, near-instant OLED response, low input lag and VRR support keep fast action sharp and responsive.

How reflective is the glossy coating?

It delivers exceptionally clear images but can act like a mirror around bright windows or direct lights. Black depth remains strong in moderate ambient light.

Does it work well with a PS5?

Games look excellent and HDMI 2.1 supports high refresh and VRR, but one long-term owner repeatedly had to restart the monitor when it failed to detect the PS5 signal.

Is the 1440p screen suitable for office work and coding?

Basic productivity works, but its WOLED subpixel layout can make text fuzzy or fringed. Conventional IPS screens are a better fit for extended text-heavy tasks.

How good is HDR on this monitor?

OLED contrast produces impactful highlights, but color volume and HDR tone mapping trail some newer OLED models. Some presets clip detail, and one owner found Windows HDR dull.

Is burn-in a problem after months of use?

One owner saw no visible burn-in after over 700 hours with static interfaces; OLED shift and cleaning tools seem helpful. That is encouraging short-term evidence, not a guarantee against future burn-in.

Is it worth buying at a discount?

Discounts around $380–$500 received strong praise for bringing glossy OLED gaming within reach. At prices close to newer Tandem OLED competitors, the value argument weakens.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

rtings.com

The LG 27GX704A-B is an entry-level OLED gaming monitor. It uses a third-gen WOLED panel with a 27-inch, 1440p screen and 240Hz refresh rate...

Review score
4.3

Top Monitors to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Swift 34 QD-OLED PG34WCDN
4.5

This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.

Pros: color gamut, contrast

Cons: value for money, Resolution

#2 MSI MPG 341CQR QD-OLED X36
4.4

The 360Hz QD-OLED panel delivers exceptional HDR gaming, responsive motion, and cleaner text than earlier ultrawides. Its 3440×1440 resolution is less sharp than 4K, and premium pricing remains a hurdle.

Pros: refresh rate, Text fringing

Cons: Resolution, GPU demands

#3 Dell U4025QW
4.4

A huge, sharp ultrawide workspace and unusually capable Thunderbolt dock make the U4025QW outstanding for demanding productivity and editing. Its high price, modest HDR, and imperfect motion handling keep it...

Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, built-in speakers

#4 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
4.4

Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker