Orbitals

Orbitals Feature Scores

Explore all 62 feature scores for Orbitals, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

62 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    2 (3%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    43 (69%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    14 (23%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (5%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.3
    37 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.3, 37 reviews, strong consensus
    The retro anime art direction is the clearest consensus strength, convincingly recreating the look and texture of late-'80s and '90s animation.
  • 4.4
    20 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.4, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    The energetic retro-anime soundtrack—especially the opening and title themes—is repeatedly singled out as a presentation highlight.
  • 4.3
    32 reviews strong consensus
    graphics quality: 4.3, 32 reviews, strong consensus
    Orbitals is repeatedly called stunning in motion, with its 3D scenes and animated cinematics blending into an unusually convincing playable anime.
  • 4.3
    30 reviews strong consensus
    atmosphere: 4.3, 30 reviews, strong consensus
    Its playful, cozy spacefaring atmosphere and abundant charm soften several reviewers' complaints about the story and mechanics.
  • 4.1
    56 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.1, 56 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers find the adventure joyful, charming, and consistently fun with a partner, even when individual mechanics or story beats fall short.
  • 4.1
    46 reviews moderate consensus
    co-op experience: 4.1, 46 reviews, moderate consensus
    Cooperation is the heart of the game: asymmetric roles, shared problem-solving, and constant coordination make it especially rewarding with a compatible partner.
  • 4.1
    29 reviews strong consensus
    animation quality: 4.1, 29 reviews, strong consensus
    The hand-drawn cinematics and deliberately anime-like movement are repeatedly described as gorgeous, authentic, and unusually seamless with gameplay.
  • 4.0
    16 reviews strong consensus
    innovation: 4.0, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers praise the steady flow of creative setups, yet often note that promising concepts disappear before reaching their full potential.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    platform-specific feature support: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch 2 features help partners connect and play, though their usefulness depends on the chosen local or online setup.
  • 3.9
    30 reviews moderate consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 3.9, 30 reviews, moderate consensus
    Its grappling, liquid, and beam tools combine in clever cooperative ways, but some reviewers wish the best ideas were explored more deeply.
  • 4.1
    11 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 4.1, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Movement and tool use are widely considered responsive and intuitive, helping failures feel tied to coordination rather than unreliable input.
  • 4.2
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    voice acting: 4.2, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The lead performances receive strong praise for fitting the retro-anime tone, though some reviewers prefer Japanese audio to the chatty English dub.
  • 3.9
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    protagonist appeal: 3.9, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    Maki and Omura's upbeat chemistry is widely liked, although their relentless chatter and limited depth divide some reviewers.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    frame rate stability: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The intentionally stylized frame cadence generally supports the anime illusion, while technical performance is described as mostly smooth.
  • 3.8
    26 reviews moderate consensus
    core gameplay loop: 3.8, 26 reviews, moderate consensus
    Moment-to-moment play is lively and cooperative, although some critics find its repeated tool interactions less ambitious than its inspirations.
  • 3.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    exploration quality: 3.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Linear stages still reward curiosity with playful details, hidden rooms, and activities, though exploration remains secondary to cooperative puzzles.
  • 3.7
    47 reviews low consensus
    puzzle design: 3.7, 47 reviews, low consensus
    Cooperative puzzles are clever, varied, and satisfying when both players synchronize, but a repeated criticism is that many solutions are too simple.
  • 3.8
    21 reviews low consensus
    content variety: 3.8, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The game introduces ideas rapidly and often feels inventive, but several reviewers say later sections reuse concepts or abandon promising mechanics too quickly.
  • 3.8
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    level design: 3.8, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    Stages are visually distinct and packed with changing scenarios, although later areas sometimes feel compressed or less fully developed.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews strong consensus
    couch co-op quality: 4.2, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Local split-screen play is a major strength, turning the compact campaign into an easy recommendation for couples, friends, and families sharing a couch.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    onboarding experience: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The opening gets pairs into cooperative play quickly and introduces new interactions in digestible bursts.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sound design: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound effects and ambient audio support the tactile tools and spacefaring atmosphere without drawing consistent complaints.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The leads' banter, puns, and constant chatter are charming to many reviewers but grating to a smaller group, especially in English.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    split-screen quality: 3.9, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The split-screen format supports independent roles well, though duplicated views and crowded action occasionally reduce clarity.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    online stability: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Online co-op is available and generally serviceable in the reviews that discuss it, with few recurring connection complaints.
  • 4.1
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    boss design: 4.1, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Boss encounters stand out when piloting, shooting, and shipboard tasks force both players to coordinate under pressure.
  • 3.8
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    environmental detail: 3.8, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Locations, props, and small animated touches reinforce the retro-futurist style and make the world consistently pleasant to explore.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    family friendliness: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers often recommend it for family play because the tone is warm and the systems are forgiving, despite a few demanding coordination tests.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    platforming precision: 3.8, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Platforming is mostly responsive and forgiving, but tandem precision sections and occasional hitbox issues can cause frustration.
  • 3.8
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    polish: 3.8, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The audiovisual presentation feels highly polished, while a handful of underdeveloped mechanics and technical rough edges keep it from feeling flawless.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    multiplayer design: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Asymmetric responsibilities keep both players involved and make communication essential, although the game requires a second player at all times.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    combat system: 3.9, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Ship combat adds welcome urgency but can become chaotic or uncomfortable, particularly when missiles and hazards crowd the screen.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    performance optimization: 3.9, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Performance is generally smooth and polished, with only scattered technical issues reported across the reviewed builds.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    mission design: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The compact mission structure moves quickly between puzzles, traversal, and ship sequences, though some objectives feel underused.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    tutorial quality: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Mechanics are introduced clearly enough for most pairs to experiment without lengthy instruction.
  • 3.5
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    world interactivity: 3.5, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Shipboard minigames, playful props, and small side activities give partners reasons to experiment between missions.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    checkpoint system: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Quick recovery and forgiving restarts keep most failures from interrupting the cooperative flow for long.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    movement feel: 3.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Running, jumping, dashing, and character animation generally feel responsive and expressive, making basic traversal enjoyable.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    visual effects quality: 3.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Lighting, transitions, and stylized effects strengthen the playable-anime illusion and make set pieces visually memorable.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    writing quality: 3.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Warm character banter helps, but the script is frequently criticized for familiar ideas, thin setup, and an underdeveloped ending.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    world-building: 4.5, 1 review
    The cassette-futurist setting is visually distinctive, but reviewers often want more depth behind its communities, technology, and late-game revelations.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    age appropriateness: 3.5, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reviewers generally see the adventure as approachable for younger players, while noting that a few coordinated challenges can test novices.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    collectibles: 4.0, 1 review
    Hidden finds and unlockable ship activities add light optional exploration, though they are not presented as a major source of depth.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    immersion: 4.0, 1 review
    The close match between cinematics and live play makes the adventure feel like stepping directly into a lost retro anime series.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    replay value: 4.0, 1 review
    The compact length and missed activities encourage some immediate replays, while limited mechanical depth reduces the incentive for others.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.7
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 2.7, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    The anime presentation gives the game a clear identity, but its structure and several mechanics remain visibly indebted to Hazelight-style adventures.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    learning curve: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The controls and cooperative goals are easy to grasp, but synchronized platforming can still challenge complete newcomers.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    camera behavior: 2.0, 1 review
    The camera is generally workable, though some sequences make hazards or platforming action harder to read.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    crash stability: 2.0, 1 review
    Reports of crashes or serious instability are limited; most discussion presents the game as technically dependable.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    handheld play suitability: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Handheld play works, though the split-screen presentation can make the smaller display less ideal than playing on a television.
  • 2.8
    42 reviews low consensus
    difficulty balance: 2.8, 42 reviews, low consensus
    The challenge is usually forgiving and family-friendly, though precision platforming and later ship sequences can frustrate less experienced pairs.
  • 2.9
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    game length: 2.9, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The roughly compact campaign leaves many players wanting more; some appreciate the focus, while others consider the ending abrupt and the price harder to justify.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    save system reliability: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Progress saving raises few concerns and generally stays out of the cooperative experience's way.
  • 2.9
    17 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 2.9, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Many enjoy the brisk stream of new situations, while others find parts slow and the final stretch rushed or overstuffed.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 3.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The presentation and central friendship create genuine warmth, but rushed storytelling prevents the finale from landing equally well for everyone.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character development: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Maki and Omura are likable together, but several critics find their development thin and the supporting relationships insufficiently explored.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character roster: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The central duo tends to overshadow the supporting cast, which some reviewers find colorful but lightly developed.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    menu usability: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Menus and settings are functional, with little reviewer attention compared with the cooperative action.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    value for money: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The polished co-op adventure earns recommendations from many reviewers, but its short length makes the asking price a meaningful concern for some buyers.
  • 3.3
    5 reviews low consensus
    bug frequency: 3.3, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Technical blemishes appear occasionally, including awkward hitboxes and isolated glitches, but most reviewers do not consider them severe.
  • 3.2
    36 reviews low consensus
    narrative quality: 3.2, 36 reviews, low consensus
    The story provides a warm premise and likable friendship but draws recurring criticism for thin development, derivative ideas, and a rushed finale.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    flying mechanics: 3.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Dividing piloting and gunnery between two players creates memorable teamwork, even if visibility and late-game pressure can make flight frustrating.