LG 45GX950A-B Monitor Review

Brand: LG
Released: March 17, 2025
Updated: 11 hours ago
4.1
Overall review score
700
Review insights
98
Scored features
22
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

The expansive 5K2K OLED makes games exceptionally immersive, with a 330Hz fallback for faster play. Its aggressive 800R curve, steep price and softer high-speed mode are substantial compromises.

High-end PC gamers who value immersive single-player, RPG, racing or flight-simulator experiences, and who want a tall ultrawide screen that also handles several work windows.

Budget-conscious buyers, compact desks, competitive players who need all HUD elements in view, or anyone using static office applications for long stretches and preferring a flatter screen.

Verdict

The LG 45GX950A-B is at its best with a powerful gaming PC and a desk large enough for its towering 45-inch 21:9 screen. Native 5120×2160 detail, deep OLED blacks, quick pixel response and striking HDR highlights make story-driven games and simulators unusually absorbing. Dual Mode adds a 330Hz option for fast competitive play, although switching to 2560×1080 makes the picture visibly softer. The biggest disagreement concerns the fixed 800R curve: it can feel like a cockpit in racing games, but several reviewers find it excessive for normal gaming or straight-lined desktop work. It has useful HDMI, DisplayPort and USB-C connectivity, yet lacks a KVM switch and a more generous hub. Bright full-screen scenes and highly saturated HDR colors also reveal WOLED limitations. For gamers who specifically want this enormous format, the experience can be exceptional; more conventional or budget-conscious buyers have better-balanced alternatives.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

98 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    46 (47%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    20 (20%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    20 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    10 (10%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 5.0
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Resolution: 5.0, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    The 5120×2160 resolution finally gives a 45-inch ultrawide the detail it deserves. Games and desktop text look substantially sharper than on older 3440×1440 panels of similar size.
  • 4.8
    21 reviews strong consensus
    overall satisfaction: 4.8, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    The monitor earns strong enthusiasm for its screen size, sharpness and immersive gaming, even from those who criticize particular settings. Its steep cost, aggressive curve and a few display compromises keep it from being an easy all-purpose recommendation.
  • 4.6
    20 reviews strong consensus
    refresh rate: 4.6, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Native 165Hz is smooth for high-resolution games, and the optional 330Hz mode is enticing for fast play. Achieving the faster rate requires giving up the detailed 5K2K image.
  • 4.5
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    Dual-mode versatility: 4.5, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    The choice between detailed 5120×2160 at 165Hz and smoother 2560×1080 at 330Hz makes the monitor unusually versatile. The high-speed mode sacrifices obvious sharpness, and opinions differ on how often that tradeoff is worthwhile.
  • 4.6
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    screen size: 4.6, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    The towering 45-inch screen delivers an unusually expansive view and plenty of workspace. It can also dominate an ordinary desk, so buyers should be comfortable with its size.
  • 4.0
    19 reviews low consensus
    curved screen immersion: 4.0, 19 reviews, low consensus
    The tight 800R curve can feel wonderfully enveloping during gaming and simulations, yet others find it excessive for everyday use and straight-line work. Its shape is a major preference-dependent decision.

Cons highlights

  • 2.1
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 2.1, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    The launch-level price is a major barrier, even allowing for its unusual 45-inch 5K2K panel. A lower sale price helps, but there are much cheaper OLED alternatives for owners who do not need this exact format.
  • 2.6
    13 reviews low consensus
    GPU demands: 2.6, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Driving 11 million pixels at high settings is demanding, especially in modern AAA games. A powerful graphics card is needed to get the full benefit of 5K2K and high refresh rates.
  • 3.4
    12 reviews low consensus
    brightness: 3.4, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Small bright highlights can be punchy for OLED, but sustained bright scenes are comparatively dim. Brightness evaluations vary with content, mode and room lighting.
  • 2.1
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Image scaling: 2.1, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Lower-resolution modes look much softer than native 5K2K, and the smaller simulated screen sizes suffer particularly poor scaling. Smoother 330Hz motion does not always make up for the loss of definition.
  • 2.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    Desk footprint: 2.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The huge panel demands substantial desk width and depth, although its relatively compact flat stand helps recover some usable surface. Measure your workstation before making room for the 800R curve.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    DisplayPort connectivity: 3.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    DisplayPort 2.1 offers modern connectivity, but its bandwidth falls short of the UHBR20 maximum, so full-resolution high-refresh signals can require compression. One setup also suffered HDMI-versus-DisplayPort reliability differences.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Racing games: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Racing simulations are a natural fit: the wrapped 800R display places track scenery in peripheral vision and keeps the cockpit feeling convincing. The extra height is useful as well as immersive.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Dark-room viewing: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Perfect OLED blacks and bright localized highlights make dark-room play and viewing especially compelling. Dim scenes retain depth without LCD-like blooming.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    HDR gaming: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    HDR games shine in dark scenes, where deep blacks meet vivid sparks, highlights and responsive motion. Calibration limitations and weaker bright full-screen scenes keep the HDR experience from being universally ideal.

Not ideal for

  • Budget-conscious buyers
    1.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Budget-conscious buyers: 1.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Its unusually high price makes it a poor choice for a tight budget. Smaller OLED ultrawides offer much of the gaming excitement for substantially less.
  • Long-term ownership
    2.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Long-term ownership: 2.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Basic care functions are available and short-term condition can be reassuring, but permanent image retention is a concern with repeated static content. The warranty and limited protection controls temper confidence in years of office-heavy use.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in Display-mode switching reliability, Remote control usability, HDR highlight detail, near average in refresh rate, overall satisfaction, below average in Power efficiency, Color brightness, premium feel.

Comparison summary

96 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    46 (48%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    23 (24%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    27 (28%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Power efficiency 1.0 3.6 -2.6
Color brightness 2.1 4.2 -2.1
Display-mode switching reliability 4.8 2.8 +2.0
premium feel 2.0 4.2 -2.2
value for money 2.1 3.7 -1.7
Remote control usability 5.0 2.9 +2.1
HDR highlight detail 5.0 3.4 +1.6
KVM switch performance 1.3 3.0 -1.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better competitive gaming suitability

Choose LG 27GX790A-B. It scores 4.9 vs 3.7 for competitive gaming suitability, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better curved screen immersion

Choose LG 39GX950B-B. It scores 4.9 vs 4.0 for curved screen immersion, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: productivity text clarity Dell’s work-focused 5K2K screen is cited as providing sharper text.
  • Compared: gaming versus productivity The LG leads for gaming and OLED contrast, while the Dell is favored for sharper text and business-oriented connectivity.
  • Better: pixel density for text work The 39-inch LG is said to have sharper text thanks to its higher pixel density.
  • Alternative: text sharpness and panel brightness The newer smaller LG improves pixel density, brightness and color purity while retaining 5K2K dual mode.
  • Cheaper: resolution sharpness versus size The smaller Asus is presented as substantially cheaper with higher pixel density but far less screen area.

FAQ

Is the LG 45GX950A-B sharp enough for desktop text?

Its 5120×2160 resolution is much sharper than earlier 45-inch 3440×1440 OLED ultrawides. However, smaller 4K displays still have greater pixel density, and some text fringing can remain.

Can it run 5K2K at 330Hz?

No. Native 5120×2160 is limited to 165Hz; its 330Hz mode reduces resolution to 2560×1080. The faster mode boosts motion clarity but makes the image noticeably softer.

How noticeable is the 800R curve?

Very noticeable. The wraparound shape is praised for racing and flight simulation but can distort desktop windows and feel too extreme for some games.

Does it work well with PS5 and other consoles?

It supports modern HDMI 2.1 console connections, but consoles do not use the full 21:9 ultrawide image. Expect black bars on the sides of most console games.

Is the monitor good for work as well as gaming?

The wide and tall screen accommodates multiple windows, editing timelines and large documents. Its strong curve and OLED burn-in concerns make it less ideal for full-time static desktop work.

Is HDR performance good?

Dark HDR scenes look spectacular, with true blacks and vivid highlights. Bright full-screen content is less punchy, and the brightest HDR settings can sacrifice tone-mapping accuracy.

What connectivity does it have?

It includes DisplayPort 2.1, two HDMI 2.1 inputs and USB-C with up to 90W power delivery. The limited USB hub and lack of a KVM switch are notable omissions at this price.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Monitors to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Swift 34 QD-OLED PG34WCDN
4.5

This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.

Pros: color gamut, contrast

Cons: value for money, Resolution

#2 MSI MPG 341CQR QD-OLED X36
4.4

The 360Hz QD-OLED panel delivers exceptional HDR gaming, responsive motion, and cleaner text than earlier ultrawides. Its 3440×1440 resolution is less sharp than 4K, and premium pricing remains a hurdle.

Pros: refresh rate, Text fringing

Cons: Resolution, GPU demands

#3 Dell U4025QW
4.4

A huge, sharp ultrawide workspace and unusually capable Thunderbolt dock make the U4025QW outstanding for demanding productivity and editing. Its high price, modest HDR, and imperfect motion handling keep it...

Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy

Cons: value for money, built-in speakers

#4 ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
4.4

Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...

Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction

Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker