If you want better KVM switch performance
Choose ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for KVM switch performance, with a 4.2 overall score.
The expansive 5K2K OLED makes games exceptionally immersive, with a 330Hz fallback for faster play. Its aggressive 800R curve, steep price and softer high-speed mode are substantial compromises.
High-end PC gamers who value immersive single-player, RPG, racing or flight-simulator experiences, and who want a tall ultrawide screen that also handles several work windows.
Budget-conscious buyers, compact desks, competitive players who need all HUD elements in view, or anyone using static office applications for long stretches and preferring a flatter screen.
The LG 45GX950A-B is at its best with a powerful gaming PC and a desk large enough for its towering 45-inch 21:9 screen. Native 5120×2160 detail, deep OLED blacks, quick pixel response and striking HDR highlights make story-driven games and simulators unusually absorbing. Dual Mode adds a 330Hz option for fast competitive play, although switching to 2560×1080 makes the picture visibly softer. The biggest disagreement concerns the fixed 800R curve: it can feel like a cockpit in racing games, but several reviewers find it excessive for normal gaming or straight-lined desktop work. It has useful HDMI, DisplayPort and USB-C connectivity, yet lacks a KVM switch and a more generous hub. Bright full-screen scenes and highly saturated HDR colors also reveal WOLED limitations. For gamers who specifically want this enormous format, the experience can be exceptional; more conventional or budget-conscious buyers have better-balanced alternatives.
Compared with other Monitors, this product is above average in Display-mode switching reliability, Remote control usability, HDR highlight detail, near average in refresh rate, overall satisfaction, below average in Power efficiency, Color brightness, premium feel.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power efficiency | 1.0 | 3.6 | -2.6 |
| Color brightness | 2.1 | 4.2 | -2.1 |
| Display-mode switching reliability | 4.8 | 2.8 | +2.0 |
| premium feel | 2.0 | 4.2 | -2.2 |
| value for money | 2.1 | 3.7 | -1.7 |
| Remote control usability | 5.0 | 2.9 | +2.1 |
| HDR highlight detail | 5.0 | 3.4 | +1.6 |
| KVM switch performance | 1.3 | 3.0 | -1.7 |
Choose ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for KVM switch performance, with a 4.2 overall score.
Choose LG 27GX790A-B. It scores 4.9 vs 3.7 for competitive gaming suitability, with a 4.0 overall score.
Choose LG 39GX950B-B. It scores 4.9 vs 4.0 for curved screen immersion, with a 4.1 overall score.
Choose ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCWM. It scores 5.0 vs 4.4 for sharpness, with a 4.3 overall score.
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Its 5120×2160 resolution is much sharper than earlier 45-inch 3440×1440 OLED ultrawides. However, smaller 4K displays still have greater pixel density, and some text fringing can remain.
No. Native 5120×2160 is limited to 165Hz; its 330Hz mode reduces resolution to 2560×1080. The faster mode boosts motion clarity but makes the image noticeably softer.
Very noticeable. The wraparound shape is praised for racing and flight simulation but can distort desktop windows and feel too extreme for some games.
It supports modern HDMI 2.1 console connections, but consoles do not use the full 21:9 ultrawide image. Expect black bars on the sides of most console games.
The wide and tall screen accommodates multiple windows, editing timelines and large documents. Its strong curve and OLED burn-in concerns make it less ideal for full-time static desktop work.
Dark HDR scenes look spectacular, with true blacks and vivid highlights. Bright full-screen content is less punchy, and the brightest HDR settings can sacrifice tone-mapping accuracy.
It includes DisplayPort 2.1, two HDMI 2.1 inputs and USB-C with up to 90W power delivery. The limited USB hub and lack of a KVM switch are notable omissions at this price.
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
The LG 45GX950A-B pairs 45-inch 5K2K OLED at 165 Hz with 2560 × 1080 at 330 Hz. See who benefits and the trade-offs in HDR, text, size, and...
The 45-inch LG 45GX950A provides OLED quality on a massive screen with 5K2K resolution. The result? The best gaming monitor I’ve ever tested.
Very curvy OLED gaming monitor with a 21:9 45-inch screen running at 5120x2160 pixels
This monitor is unreal – in the best of ways
The LG Ultragear GX9 45GX950A-B is a wonderful gaming monitor that comes with an ultrawide, immersive OLED screen and a price to match.
This 360Hz QD-OLED ultrawide delivers exceptional gaming motion, vibrant HDR and dramatically cleaner text. Its high price, less-than-perfect bright-room blacks and occasional HDR dimming are the main reasons to hesitate.
Pros: color gamut, contrast
Cons: value for money, Resolution
The 360Hz QD-OLED panel delivers exceptional HDR gaming, responsive motion, and cleaner text than earlier ultrawides. Its 3440×1440 resolution is less sharp than 4K, and premium pricing remains a hurdle.
Pros: refresh rate, Text fringing
Cons: Resolution, GPU demands
A huge, sharp ultrawide workspace and unusually capable Thunderbolt dock make the U4025QW outstanding for demanding productivity and editing. Its high price, modest HDR, and imperfect motion handling keep it...
Pros: overall picture quality, color accuracy
Cons: value for money, built-in speakers
Lightning-fast 360Hz OLED gaming, rich color and an unusually flexible USB-C/KVM setup are the big draws. Strong room lighting, limited full-screen HDR brightness and static-content burn-in concerns keep it from...
Pros: color gamut, overall satisfaction
Cons: reflection handling, VRR flicker