The expanded sensing surface appears to improve ECG capture, including a smoother experience for one user who had trouble with an older Apple Watch.
Pros: value for money, heart rate accuracy
Cons: data privacy
The expanded sensing surface appears to improve ECG capture, including a smoother experience for one user who had trouble with an older Apple Watch.
Pros: value for money, heart rate accuracy
Cons: data privacy
ECG readings generally worked as expected and one comparison produced results similar to a dedicated Kardia device. It remains a wellness feature rather than a substitute for clinical diagnostic equipment.
Pros: battery life, comfort
Cons: value for money, charging speed
ECG remains one of the more immediately useful health tools, especially compared with newer trend-based metrics that need longer baselines.
Pros: software smoothness, style and design
Cons: value for money, wellness insights
ECG functionality was a weakness because reviewers noted the feature is absent and that Garmin offers superior ECG-related capability.
Pros: GPS accuracy, battery life
Cons: band quality, smartwatch features
ECG remains absent because the watch retains the older BioTracker sensor generation. One reviewer considered this an overdue omission for the Balance line.
Pros: battery life, brightness
Cons: fit, third-party app support
ECG is a clear missing health feature; one reviewer called its absence one of the few serious criticisms.
Pros: battery life, value for money
Cons: reliability
ECG is not available on the Forerunner 170, and reviewers note that buyers must move to a pricier Garmin to get it.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: mapping and navigation, materials quality
ECG is useful as part of Samsung's broad health suite, but its Galaxy-phone requirement sharply limits access for users of other Android brands.
Pros: software smoothness, wellness insights
Cons: battery life, charging speed
ECG was also a limitation: reviewers framed the missing ECG sensor as understandable at the price but still a downside for users who prioritize health metrics.
Pros: value for money, flashlight usefulness
Cons: user interface