If you want better fit
Choose Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro. It scores 4.8 vs 3.1 for fit, with a 4.1 overall score.
Amazfit Balance 3 Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for outstanding battery life, bright maps, accurate GPS and heart-rate tracking, and serious training tools at a competitive price. Skip it if you have a small wrist, need LTE, ECG, deep apps, or dependable strength auto-detection.
Best for
Best for runners, hybrid athletes, hikers, HYROX users, and fitness-focused buyers who want long battery life, accurate tracking, and excellent maps without paying flagship Garmin prices.
Not for
Skip it if you have a small wrist, prioritize a deep smartwatch app ecosystem, need LTE or ECG, rely on streaming music, or expect flawless automatic strength-set detection.
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 3 succeeds by delivering the parts serious fitness users notice every day: excellent battery endurance, a large and exceptionally bright AMOLED screen, dependable dual-band GPS, strong heart-rate results, useful offline navigation, and increasingly mature recovery tools. Its sapphire glass and stainless-steel build also feel convincingly premium for the price. The compromises are equally clear. The single 51.4mm case is unsuitable for many smaller wrists, the stock band may irritate some users, and strength-training auto-detection can misread paused movements. Zepp OS covers practical smartwatch basics, but LTE, ECG, streaming music, and a deep app catalog are missing. Existing Balance 2 owners may not gain enough to justify the higher price, but newcomers wanting a fitness-first Garmin alternative get an unusually complete package.
Product generations
Amazfit Balance- Amazfit Balance 2
- Amazfit Balance 3This product
Feature Scorecards
Summary
52 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.020 (38%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.420 (38%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.48 (15%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.43 (6%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros highlights
-
Battery life is a standout strength across the board. Reviewers routinely went well over a week with heavy use, while typical-use and GPS endurance sharply reduce charging anxiety.
-
The 3,000-nit AMOLED was repeatedly praised as exceptionally bright. Workout data remained easy to read in strong sunlight, making the screen a major outdoor advantage.
-
Most reviewers liked the distinctive, premium, industrial look, especially in person. The large rugged styling is deliberately bold, however, and some people may find it tacky or insufficiently subtle.
-
The large 1.5-inch AMOLED is one of the watch’s strongest features. It is sharp, spacious, bright, and especially effective for maps and workout fields viewed while moving.
-
Offline maps, route creation, POI search, turn-by-turn guidance, and automatic rerouting form a genuinely strong navigation package. The large display makes routes usable, though one first-look reviewer still found phone maps easier.
-
Dual-band GPS consistently tracked close to Garmin and other premium competitors across roads, forests, buildings, and underpasses. Small deviations appeared in dense cover, but overall accuracy was one of the strongest points.
Cons highlights
-
The thin profile helps the 51.4mm case sit flatter and steadier than expected, but it is still an enormous watch. Larger wrists are the natural fit; smaller wrists may find it bulky or impractical.
-
Fitness-service connectivity and data export are useful, but wrist-app support is limited. The absence of Spotify and the shallow app catalog keep it behind Apple Watch and Wear OS for extensibility.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in mapping and navigation, onboard music storage, flashlight usefulness, near average in recovery insights, companion app quality, below average in activity auto-detection, size options, fit.
Comparison summary
52 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher26 (50%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts16 (31%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower10 (19%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| activity auto-detection | 1.3 | 3.7 | -2.4 |
| mapping and navigation | 4.6 | 3.4 | +1.2 |
| onboard music storage | 4.1 | 2.9 | +1.1 |
| size options | 2.0 | 3.2 | -1.2 |
| flashlight usefulness | 4.7 | 3.7 | +1.0 |
| smartphone notifications | 4.6 | 3.5 | +1.1 |
| watch face quality | 4.8 | 3.8 | +1.0 |
| smartwatch features | 4.4 | 3.5 | +0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better button controls
Choose Amazfit Active 3 Premium. It scores 4.6 vs 4.0 for button controls, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better contactless payments
Choose TicWatch Pro 5. It scores 5.0 vs 3.1 for contactless payments, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better size options
Choose Garmin Venu 3. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for size options, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Similar: running GPS and heart-rate accuracy The Balance 3 delivered run data comparable to the Garmin Forerunner 970 at roughly half the price.
- Similar: GPS accuracy GPS performance remained close to the Forerunner 970, which only narrowly led the route test.
- Similar: strength-training heart-rate accuracy Strength-training heart-rate performance was roughly on par with the Apple Watch benchmark.
- Similar: sleep duration tracking Overnight duration estimates stayed close to the Apple Watch Ultra and other competing watches.
FAQ
How long does the Amazfit Balance 3 battery last?
Reviewers consistently got well over a week with demanding use, while Amazfit rates typical use at up to 21 days. GPS endurance was also praised, with about 41 hours in accurate mode.
Is the Amazfit Balance 3 accurate for running?
Yes. Dual-band GPS and heart-rate tracking usually stayed close to Garmin, Apple, Suunto, Coros, and chest-strap references, especially during steady runs.
Is the Amazfit Balance 3 comfortable on small wrists?
Probably not for many users. The single 51.4mm case is very large, although its relatively thin profile helps it sit flatter than the diameter suggests.
Does the Amazfit Balance 3 have offline maps?
Yes. It supports offline maps, turn-by-turn directions, route creation, POI search, and automatic rerouting, and the large screen makes routes easy to read.
Is the Amazfit Balance 3 good for sleep tracking?
Sleep duration and restlessness generally matched competing wearables, but one reviewer found the scoring too mild after a poor night. The watch's size and stock strap may also make overnight wear uncomfortable.
Does the Amazfit Balance 3 support LTE or ECG?
No. It has neither LTE nor ECG, so connected calls and notifications require a nearby phone, and ECG-focused buyers need another device.
Should Balance 2 owners upgrade?
The upgrade is less compelling for existing Balance 2 owners because battery and sensors are similar and some software features overlap. The stronger reasons are the premium case, brighter display, extra controls, flashlight, storage, and improved navigation.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Lim Reviews
- Review score
- 4.5
YouTube - German Accent Reviews
- Review score
- 4.0
YouTube - It's Matt B
- Review score
- 4.6
YouTube - The Product Reviewer
- Review score
- 4.3
YouTube - Tech, Gadgets and Other Great Ideas
- Review score
- 3.7
Article Reviews
lifehacker.com
The Amazfit Balance 3 is for the kind of person who resents charging a smartwatch every night, who wants accurate GPS and heart-rate data...
- Review score
- 3.7
gadgetsandwearables.com
Amazfit Balance 3 review with real-world testing, specs, battery life, GPS accuracy and how it compares with the Balance 2.
- Review score
- 4.2
gritdaily.com
I've been wearing the Amazfit Balance 3 for a few weeks now, and somewhere along the way it developed an annoying habit.
- Review score
- 4.7
the-gadgeteer.com
Amazfit's Balance 3 packs up to 21 days of battery, sapphire glass, a 3,000-nit AMOLED, and HYROX tools. Get pricing, specs, and release timing.
- Review score
- 4.3
the5krunner.com
A graveyard, a misread lake, and a chance run with a sleep tech CEO. First impressions of the Amazfit Balance 3 on a lumpy Stockholm trail...
- Review score
- 4.4
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...
Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money
Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments
Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...
Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy
Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: battery life, value for money
Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features