Best Movies

What matters
Best for
Studio
Release year
#81 jackass: best and last
3.5

Best for a funny, unexpectedly moving farewell built on the crew’s camaraderie and classic crowd-pleasing stunts. Skip it if you want a mostly new movie or dislike relentless nudity, excrement,...

Pros: entertainment value, emotional impact

Cons: originality, action sequences

#82 Charlie Harper
3.5

Best for Emilia Jones and Nick Robinson’s chemistry, emotional breakup drama, and ambitious memory structure. Skip it if nonlinear storytelling, familiar indie-romance tropes, or shallow treatment of addiction will outweigh...

Pros: emotional impact, romance quality

Cons: story quality, screenplay quality

#83 Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass
3.5

Best for fearless absurdist comedy, rapid-fire gags, and a terrific self-mocking cast. Skip it if loose plotting, niche Hollywood jokes, or cartoon violence quickly wear you down.

Pros: humor, entertainment value

Cons: audience appeal, pacing

#84 Beware Boiúna
3.5

Best for committed performances, grimy Amazon atmosphere, brutal creature horror, and a serious take on giant-snake thrills. Skip it if slow setup, shaky dark action, sparse monster visibility, or a...

Pros: genre satisfaction, acting performance

Cons: entertainment value, character development

#85 The Housemaid
3.5

Best for gleefully pulpy twists, theatrical camp, and Amanda Seyfried's magnetic chaos. Skip it if predictable reveals, tonal whiplash, and a two-hour-plus runtime undermine your thrillers.

Pros: entertainment value, acting performance

Cons: plot originality, pacing

#86 Disclosure Day
3.4

Best for Emily Blunt, superb chase staging, and sincere sci-fi wonder. Skip it if shaky creature CGI, an overstuffed script, and a highly divisive final act outweigh Spielberg’s craft.

Pros: action sequences, lead performance

Cons: screenplay quality, ending satisfaction

#87 Enola Holmes 3
3.4

Best for Millie Bobby Brown’s charm, the sweet romance, and an attractive Maltese adventure. Skip it if you need a tightly reasoned Holmes mystery or want much more Sherlock.

Pros: entertainment value, lead performance

Cons: mystery quality, pacing

#88 Night Nurse
3.4

Best for daring psychosexual weirdness, magnetic lead performances, and lush, claustrophobic imagery. Skip it if you need clear motives, believable plotting, steady suspense, or a fully satisfying ending.

Pros: visual style, supporting cast performance

Cons: story quality, character development

#89 The Death of Robin Hood
3.4

Best for Hugh Jackman’s commanding performance, striking medieval imagery, and a thoughtful redemption story. Skip it if graphic child-killing, relentless gloom, or a very slow second half will outweigh the...

Pros: visual style, cinematography

Cons: story quality, pacing

#90 Digger
3.4

Best for Cruise’s fearless performance, audacious craft, and confrontational climate satire. Skip it if you dislike loud, self-conscious comedy, long monologues, or deliberately abrasive storytelling.

Pros: lead performance, production design

Cons: humor, message quality

#91 fuze
3.3

Best for a brisk bomb-and-heist thriller with lively tension and plenty of reversals. Skip it if you need rich characters, airtight heist logic or a clean, satisfying finale.

Pros: entertainment value, pacing

Cons: ending satisfaction, screenplay quality

#92 Hope
3.3

Best for audacious big-screen action, practical spectacle, dark humor, and strong performances. Skip it if rough creature CGI, thin characterization, a long runtime, or an abrupt sequel-setting ending will outweigh...

Pros: action sequences, humor

Cons: CGI quality, ending satisfaction

#93 Young Washington
3.3

Best for grand colonial battle scenes and an uplifting early-leadership story; skip it if you want a probing, consistently paced, historically exact portrait.

Pros: action sequences, lead performance

Cons: story quality, historical accuracy

#94 Evil Dead Burn
3.3

Best for extreme practical gore, kinetic camerawork, and a vicious new Deadite spin. Skip it if you need rich characters, playful franchise humor, or restraint.

Pros: directing quality, cinematography

Cons: humor, violence level

#95 In the Grey
3.3

Best for slick heist-action, charismatic leads, and brisk momentum. Skip it if you need deep characters, clean plotting, or sustained suspense.

Pros: entertainment value, action sequences

Cons: character development, plot clarity

#96 The Uprising
3.3

Best for committed performances, brutal historical drama, and timely themes. Skip it if shaky camerawork, graphic violence, thin characterization, or the divisive Robin Hood coda are likely to overwhelm the...

Pros: lead performance, action sequences

Cons: ending satisfaction, cinematography

#97 Onslaught
3.2

Good if you want a slick, synth-driven Carpenter-style bloodbath led by a widely praised Adria Arjona. Skip it if thin characters, undercooked ideas, uneven pacing, or an anticlimactic finale will...

Pros: lead performance, entertainment value

Cons: action sequences, ending satisfaction

#98 Ready or Not 2: Here I Come
3.2

Best for Samara Weaving, gleeful ensemble chemistry, and bigger blood-soaked set pieces—especially with a lively crowd. Skip it if you want the first film’s tight suspense, fresh premise, or cleanly...

Pros: entertainment value, action sequences

Cons: character development, genre satisfaction

#99 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
3.2

Best for charismatic performers, period style, and the deadpan fun of Austen with swords. Skip it if you want relentless zombie horror or a fully developed Elizabeth-and-Darcy romance.

Pros: lead performance, supporting cast performance

Cons: entertainment value, action sequences

#100 Wuthering Heights
3.2

Best for lavish visuals, bold costumes, strong music, and a deliberately modern, erotic spin. Skip it if you want Brontë fidelity, deeper class-and-race themes, restrained style, or a romance that...

Pros: visual style, production design

Cons: romance quality, faithfulness to source material

#101 A Merry Little Ex-mas
3.2

Best for cozy Christmas atmosphere, Alicia Silverstone, and scene-stealing supporting performances. Skip it if predictable second-chance romance, hit-or-miss comedy, or an ending that sends Kate back toward the life she...

Pros: supporting cast performance, lead performance

Cons: humor, genre satisfaction

#102 Mercy
3.2

Best for a brisk, screen-driven AI mystery, ticking-clock tension, and Rebecca Ferguson’s icy judge. Skip it if contrived logic, a divisive surveillance message, and an overblown third act will sink...

Pros: entertainment value, suspense

Cons: message quality, story quality

#103 My Secret Santa
3.2

Best for a cozy, low-stakes Christmas rom-com carried by Alexandra Breckenridge and likable chemistry. Skip it if you need fresh plotting, strong realism, or deeper character development.

Pros: lead performance, emotional impact

Cons: humor, originality

#104 SOULM8TE
3.1

Best for Lily Sullivan’s uncanny android performance, polished visuals, and bursts of brutal gore. Skip it if predictable killer-AI plotting, shallow themes, or an uneven balance of erotic thriller and...

Pros: lead performance, violence level

Cons: entertainment value, originality

#105 Masters of the Universe
3.1

Best for colorful action, a thunderous retro score, affectionate fan service, and knowingly campy fun. Skip it if a 140-minute origin story, constant self-aware jokes, uneven CGI, or surprisingly intense...

Pros: faithfulness to source material, action sequences

Cons: entertainment value, humor

#106 Now You See Me: Now You Don’t
3.1

Best for lively ensemble chemistry, playful heists, and glossy trick-house spectacle. Skip it if you need airtight logic, deep characterization, or movie magic that feels plausibly practical.

Pros: entertainment value, action sequences

Cons: genre satisfaction, realism

#107 Avatar: Fire and Ash
3.1

Best for unmatched big-screen visuals, immersive 3D, and spectacular action. Skip it if recycled plotting, forced dialogue, and a 197-minute runtime outweigh technical brilliance.

Pros: visual style, action sequences

Cons: plot originality, character development

#108 Finnegan's Foursome
3.1

Best for a gentle, scenic family dramedy if golf, Irish settings, and affectionate sibling rivalry sound inviting. Skip it if you need brisk pacing, substantial character growth, or comedy that...

Pros: acting performance, cinematography

Cons: entertainment value, story quality

#109 Practical Magic 2
3.1

Best for Bullock and Kidman’s enduring chemistry, sisterhood emotion, and fan-friendly nostalgia. Skip it if you want tight plotting, brisk pacing, or the original’s looser, cozier charm.

Pros: chemistry between characters, lead performance

Cons: entertainment value, runtime

#110 The Social Reckoning
3.1

Best for sharp verbal exchanges, committed performances and an accessible look at Facebook’s harms. Skip it if you want sustained thriller tension, nuanced characters or the visual force of The...

Pros: supporting cast performance, lead performance

Cons: message quality, directing quality

#111 Couture
3.1

Best for Angelina Jolie’s vulnerable performance, evocative score, and striking runway imagery. Skip it if you need tightly developed characters, brisk pacing, or a cohesive ensemble story.

Pros: emotional impact, lead performance

Cons: character development, screenplay quality

#112 Lucky Strike
3.0

Good if you want an old-fashioned WWII survival thriller with tense set pieces. Skip it if you need fresh plotting, a fully convincing lead, or strong historical realism.

Cons: lead performance, suspense

#113 Office Romance
3.0

Best for a glossy, adult rom-com carried by Jennifer Lopez, Brett Goldstein, and a terrific supporting cast. Skip it if predictable plotting, uneven chemistry, heavy profanity, or the graphic childbirth...

Pros: supporting cast performance, lead performance

Cons: chemistry between characters, humor

#114 Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu
2.9

Best for Grogu’s charm, energetic action, excellent puppetry, and a terrific score. Skip it if you expect an ambitious Star Wars event, meaningful character growth, or a story that truly...

Pros: action sequences, practical effects quality

Cons: entertainment value, story quality

#115 By Any Means
2.9

Best for Abdul-Mateen II, the prickly lead chemistry, and striking period craft. Skip it if major historical liberties, graphic torture, or an anticlimactic ending will outweigh the pulpy revenge-thriller appeal.

Pros: chemistry between characters, acting performance

Cons: entertainment value, historical accuracy

#116 The Mortuary Assistant
2.8

Best for grisly practical mortuary effects, Willa Holland’s committed lead work, and game-faithful atmosphere. Skip it if you need clean exposition, sustained scares, or smooth pacing; those are the film’s...

Pros: lead performance, faithfulness to source material

Cons: genre satisfaction, scares

#117 Supergirl
2.8

Best for Milly Alcock’s wounded, spirited take on Kara and its imaginative alien settings. Skip it if you want a tightly plotted, uplifting superhero adventure or a compelling villain.

Pros: lead performance, supporting cast performance

Cons: entertainment value, villain quality

#118 Fall 2: Deadpoint
2.8

Best for big-screen vertigo, tense climbing set pieces, and committed leads. Skip it if repetitive sequel plotting, implausible decisions, weak character writing, or uneven effects quickly pull you out of...

Pros: suspense, cinematography

Cons: ending satisfaction, plot originality

#119 Little Brother
2.7

Best for Cena and André’s lively odd-couple chemistry and unapologetically crude physical comedy. Skip it if predictable plots, graphic sexual humor, or abrupt sentimental turns usually wear you down.

Pros: acting performance, chemistry between characters

Cons: humor, entertainment value

#120 Verity
2.6

Best for Hathaway, lush production design, campy crowd energy, and a few effective jolts. Skip it if you want tight pacing, convincing romance, or an ending that cleanly rewards the...

Pros: acting performance, production design

Cons: entertainment value, genre satisfaction