If you want better acting performance
Choose Wicked: For Good. It scores 4.8 vs 3.9 for acting performance, with a 3.5 overall score.
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Movie Review
Content guidance
Frequent zombie combat includes decapitations, dismemberment, bloody wounds, exposed bone, and disturbing decayed faces, including a mother and infant. Suggestive costume framing and mild language add smaller concerns.
Official rating
PG-13
Bottom Line
Choose it for charismatic performers, period style, and the deadpan fun of Austen with swords. Skip it if you want relentless zombie horror or a fully developed Elizabeth-and-Darcy romance.
Best for
Austen fans open to playful changes and genre viewers who enjoy deadpan camp, charismatic actors, and women wielding swords in period dress.
Not for
Viewers seeking relentless scares, graphic zombie carnage, or a richly developed traditional Austen romance may find the blend frustrating.
Verdict
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies works best when polite courtship and undead combat share the same scene. Lily James frequently wins praise for charisma and credible action, while Matt Smith’s flamboyant Collins supplies many of the biggest laughs. Period costumes, elegant estates, and the illustrated opening add appeal. The tradeoff is an uneven blend: some viewers enjoy a sincere, witty adaptation, while others find a dragging middle, rushed relationships, and an awkward apocalypse subplot. Dark photography and rapid editing often obscure fights, and restrained gore disappoints horror fans even though the creature imagery can still be grotesque. Familiarity with Austen helps, but it does not guarantee enjoyment. The strongest recommendation is for viewers comfortable with camp and competing genres rather than those seeking sustained scares.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
62 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.05 (8%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.421 (34%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.426 (42%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.410 (16%)
Pros highlights
-
Lily James is frequently praised for charisma, independence, and credible physical action. Sam Riley’s brooding Darcy inspires both admiration for his presence and criticism of his voice or limited warmth.
-
Matt Smith’s comic Collins is the most frequent standout, with Charles Dance and Lena Headey also adding charm. Smaller roles are often underused, and Smith’s exaggerated manner does not work for everyone.
-
The cast often sells the absurd premise by treating it sincerely, and several critics find the performances stronger than the material. Others hear stiff delivery or find the ensemble uneven.
-
Matt Smith’s bumbling Collins and the deadpan contrast between manners and combat generate many of the strongest laughs. The repeated zombie joke can wear thin, and Smith’s broad approach irritates a minority.
-
The Regency zombie premise is often admired as a fresh twist, particularly by viewers tired of familiar undead stories. Critics of the execution find a belated, worn-out gimmick rather than genuinely new ideas.
-
James and Riley often make a persuasive pair, especially when attraction and hostility overlap. Their chemistry does not always compensate for abbreviated romantic development.
Cons highlights
-
The film can be a playful, unexpectedly enjoyable popcorn diversion for viewers who accept its absurdity. Others find the one-joke setup dull, leaving scattered pleasures rather than a satisfying whole.
-
The proposal duel and the sisters’ martial arts provide some memorable fun. Dark lighting, rapid cuts, repetition, and too little sustained zombie action repeatedly blunt the spectacle.
-
The sincere, deadpan approach is delightful when courtship and zombie combat reinforce each other. For many, abrupt shifts and the late apocalypse plot expose a blend that never quite holds together.
-
Austen familiarity and enthusiasm for deadpan genre experiments improve the chances of enjoying this mashup. Viewers expecting relentless zombie carnage are often less satisfied.
-
Some find the courtship engaging, swoonworthy, and well integrated with the zombie setting. Others see rushed affection, missing vulnerability, or fights that displace romantic tension.
-
Many appreciate the retained Austen language, recognizable courtship story, and respectful new spin. Others object to discarded subplots, compressed character arcs, and zombie additions that overwhelm the original.
Cast & Creators
-
Pastor CollinsSmith’s flamboyant, awkward Collins repeatedly steals scenes and supplies the biggest laughs. A minority finds the same exaggerated manner irritating or overplayed.
-
LizzyJames is widely admired for a charismatic, independent Elizabeth and convincing physical action. A few viewers find her less complex than the familiar heroine or merely adequate as an actress.
-
mr. BennetDance gives the father role authority, warmth, and gravitas, with an especially welcome dry narration. His brief appearances leave some viewers wanting more.
-
Lady Catherine de BourghHeadey often adds amusing, fierce presence as the warrior Lady Catherine. Her limited use frustrates several viewers, and one finds the performance wooden.
-
WickhamHuston gives Wickham enjoyable sliminess and sinister enthusiasm. His performance contributes to the stronger parts of a frequently criticized story.
-
Jane BennetHeathcote is an appealing, sometimes entertaining Jane within the ensemble. Limited screen time and a weaker assessment of the secondary romance qualify that praise.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in CGI quality, rewatch value, drama quality, near average in originality, acting performance, below average in suspense, emotional impact, genre satisfaction.
Comparison summary
60 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher11 (18%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts20 (33%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower29 (48%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| suspense | 1.8 | 3.7 | -2.0 |
| emotional impact | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| genre satisfaction | 2.7 | 3.9 | -1.2 |
| monster visibility | 2.2 | 3.7 | -1.5 |
| cinematography | 2.8 | 4.1 | -1.3 |
| editing quality | 2.3 | 3.5 | -1.2 |
| audience appeal | 2.9 | 3.8 | -0.9 |
| CGI quality | 4.0 | 2.7 | +1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better world-building
Choose Project Hail Mary. It scores 5.0 vs 3.1 for world-building, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better lead performance
Choose Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man. It scores 4.9 vs 4.0 for lead performance, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better entertainment value
Choose The Incomer. It scores 4.8 vs 3.1 for entertainment value, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
- Worse: overall success This adaptation is judged more successful than the earlier Civil War mashup.
- Similar: climactic explosion The explosion feels overly reminiscent of scenes from the earlier adaptation.
- Worse: humor The genre confidence is similar, but this film’s humor is considered subtler and more intelligent.
The Walking Dead
- Similar: bridge climax The bridge explosion is described as closely resembling an episode of the series.
- Compared: bloodshed The movie’s bloodshed is described as tamer than the television series.
- Better: zombie scale, mythology and action The zombie treatment is judged weaker than this competing property.
World War Z
- Similar: restricted zombie horror The reviewer sees a similar mixture of good and bad undermined by restrained violence.
- Compared: action expectations Enjoyment requires expectations below a Regency version of the large-scale zombie film.
- Better: zombie scale, mythology and action The zombie treatment is judged weaker than this competing property.
FAQ
Is it more romance or zombie horror?
The courtship story occupies much of the film. Zombie combat interrupts the period drama, but several viewers find the horror secondary.
Does it respect Austen’s story?
It retains much of the language and familiar plot, which many Austen fans appreciate. Others object to rushed relationships, missing subplots, and an added apocalypse conspiracy.
Who stands out in the cast?
Lily James is frequently praised for charisma and action skills. Matt Smith’s exaggerated Collins is a common favorite, though his broad comedy irritates some viewers.
Are the fight scenes good?
The proposal duel and several martial arts moments are enjoyable highlights. Dark lighting and rapid cuts can make other fights difficult to follow.
Is it suitable for younger viewers?
It is rated PG-13, with a recommended age of 14. Bloody zombie violence, dismemberment, and disturbing decayed faces are the main concerns.
How is the Blu-ray presentation?
The supplied disc assessment praises detailed picture quality and especially strong DTS-HD Master Audio. Extras are uneven, although deleted scenes can add useful character and romance material.
Does it improve on repeat viewing?
One Austen-focused viewer enjoyed it more after adjusting expectations on a second watch. Another highly critical viewer still anticipated frequent rewatches, suggesting that its odd appeal can outlast its flaws.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Aaron Compton
- Review score
- 3.7
Article Reviews
hellhorror.com
Looking for a Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2016) review? We cover the plot, themes, and shocking moments horror fans are talking about.
- Review score
- 3.9
janeausten.co.uk
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies - Film Reviews "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want...
- Review score
- 3.8
ruthlessreviews.com
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2016) is a surprise mash-up horror/romance/drama with comic undertones. It was based on the novel of the...
- Review score
- 4.3
philosophyinfilm.com
What if Jane Austen’s famous love story took place in a zombie epidemic? Pride and Prejudice and Zombies tries to answer this question.
- Review score
- 2.7
prideandprejudice05.blogspot.com
Okay, I'm beyond late in posting my film review of Screen Gems' Pride and Prejudice and Zombies film starring Lily James & Sam Riley ...
- Review score
- 3.5
Top Movies to Consider
Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.
Pros: originality, humor
Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.
Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography
Cons: audience appeal
Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.
Pros: emotional impact, theme depth
Best for patient suspense, an unforgettable score, and an unsettling masked killer. Skip it for very young children or if you want to avoid intense scares; its restrained kills also...
Pros: directing quality, score quality
Cons: message quality