If you want better production design
Choose The Rip. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for production design, with a 3.7 overall score.
Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass Movie Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for fearless absurdist comedy, rapid-fire gags, and a terrific self-mocking cast. Skip it if loose plotting, niche Hollywood jokes, or cartoon violence quickly wear you down.
Best for
Best for fans of David Wain’s deliberately stupid anti-comedy, rapid-fire non sequiturs, celebrity self-parody, and Los Angeles industry jokes.
Not for
Skip it if you need a tight story, broadly accessible humor, restrained repetition, or a consistent tone without raunch and cartoon violence.
Verdict
This gleefully ridiculous Wizard of Oz riff succeeds when its cast fully commits to the nonsense. Zoey Deutch gives the movie a warm, mischievous center, while John Slattery and Jon Hamm turn celebrity self-parody into its most reliable laughs. The tradeoff is a deliberately flimsy story built to carry an enormous volume of gags, and critics sharply disagree about the hit rate. Fans of David Wain’s anti-comedy may find it refreshing, fast, and highly rewatchable; others will see an overlong string of forced jokes, insider references, and tonally jarring violence.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
35 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.07 (20%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (34%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (26%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.46 (17%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (3%)
Pros
-
David Wain’s commitment to absurdity, fast comic rhythm, and playful celebrity cameos is widely admired, though some felt the film shows less control than his best work.
-
The Wizard of Oz framework is familiar, yet the celebrity-sex-pass premise, aggressive anti-comedy, and self-mocking cameos make the final mix feel unusually unpredictable.
-
The joke density is enormous, but the hit rate is the central point of disagreement. Some laughed harder than they had at a recent comedy, while others found it painfully unfunny.
-
Supporters describe a breezy, irresistible theatrical experience; detractors found it a draining slog. Enjoyment depends heavily on whether the intentionally stupid humor clicks.
-
The cast commits fully to the movie’s heightened silliness. Some found the early overacting tiring, but most agreed the performers understand the absurd tone.
-
Gail and Otto’s supportive friendship gives the silliness a warm center, while Jon Hamm and John Slattery’s Mad Men history adds an effective layer of self-aware chemistry.
Cons
-
The story works primarily as a frame for jokes and cameos. That loose construction delights viewers who accept the format but frustrates those looking for a coherent, fully developed narrative.
-
The profanity and juvenile vulgarity fit the deliberately lowbrow style, but at least one critic found that approach puerile rather than playful.
-
The cartoon and gory violence is a major tonal divider. Some viewers found the sudden brutality hilarious, while others thought it struck a sour note against the movie’s cheerful mood.
-
The late action material is one of the weaker stretches, with the Western-set climax described as laugh-light compared with the faster verbal and visual gags.
-
Critical response is highly split: enthusiastic supporters see inspired absurdism, while detractors view the same choices as sloppy, shallow, or underwritten.
-
The overall construction moves quickly, but some digitally inserted cameos and transitions feel clunky enough to break the comic flow.
Cast & Creators
-
Gail DaughtryZoey Deutch anchors the movie with bright sincerity, fast comic instincts, and a mischievous edge. Even many negative reviews praise her ability to sell the ridiculous premise.
-
John Slattery is the broadest consensus standout, embracing a pathetic, filthy, self-roasting version of himself and often supplying the movie’s biggest laughs.
-
Jon Hamm leans fully into handsome-guy self-mockery, turning his celebrity image and Mad Men history into an easy source of playful comedy.
-
OttoMiles Gutierrez-Riley makes Otto a charming, supportive companion whose steadiness helps balance Gail’s increasingly chaotic mission.
-
Ken Marino gives the fallen paparazzo a mix of demented comic energy and surprising warmth while also helping shape the film’s absurd screenplay.
-
NarratorFred Melamed’s increasingly irritated narrator turns a small role into one of the movie’s most consistently praised running jokes.
View all 35 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in dialogue quality, plot originality, family friendliness, near average in humor, rewatch value, below average in production design, language level, message quality.
Comparison summary
35 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher13 (37%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts10 (29%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower12 (34%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| production design | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| language level | 1.0 | 3.1 | -2.1 |
| dialogue quality | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 |
| plot originality | 5.0 | 3.1 | +1.9 |
| message quality | 2.0 | 3.7 | -1.7 |
| critic appeal | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| action sequences | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| story quality | 1.9 | 3.2 | -1.4 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better action sequences
Choose Crime 101. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for action sequences, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better language level
Choose How to Make a Killing. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for language level, with a 3.5 overall score.
If you want better critic appeal
Choose Night Nurse. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for critic appeal, with a 3.4 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Barb and Star Go to Vista Del Mar
- Better: laugh-out-loud humor The critic enjoys the world but finds it much less laugh-out-loud funny.
- Better: absurdist comedy effectiveness The critic says this joke-delivery system is far weaker than that cult comedy.
Wet Hot American Summer
- Similar: loose string-of-gags narrative Its loose gag structure is compared favorably with Wain's comedy classic.
- Better: overall comedy quality The film is considered enjoyable but below Wain's benchmark comedy.
Evil Dead 2
- Compared: effectiveness of gory slapstick Gory slapstick is said to suit horror comedy better than this cheerful farce.
FAQ
Is the movie actually funny?
It depends heavily on your taste for deliberate stupidity and anti-comedy. Supporters call it one of the funniest recent theatrical comedies, while detractors found most of the jokes forced or painfully unfunny.
Who gives the best performance?
Zoey Deutch is the most consistent point of praise for anchoring the chaos with warmth and precision. John Slattery is the most frequently named comic standout, with Jon Hamm also praised for fearless self-mockery.
Does the Wizard of Oz structure work?
The familiar quest gives the movie a useful framework and several clever parallels, but the constant digressions and gangster subplot leave the story loose and unfocused for some viewers.
Is it suitable for children or family viewing?
No. Although the tone can feel oddly wholesome, the film includes sexual material, profanity, and cartoonishly bloody violence.
Who is most likely to enjoy it?
Viewers who already enjoy David Wain, Wet Hot American Summer, repeated anti-jokes, celebrity cameos, and Los Angeles industry satire are the strongest fit.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Fish Jelly Film Reviews
- Review score
- 4.8
YouTube - Anthony A. Perez
- Review score
- 1.9
YouTube - Eric Goldman's Cultured Pop
- Review score
- 4.3
YouTube - Lost In the Reel
- Review score
- 3.2
Article Reviews
rogerebert.com
- Review score
- 2.4
time.com
- Review score
- 4.0
thetraverstake.com
- Review score
- 4.5
chicagoreader.com
- Review score
- 4.8
Top Movies to Consider
Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...
Pros: plot clarity, realism
Cons: plot originality, runtime
Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...
Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction
Cons: runtime, pacing
Best for joyful music, rare footage, candid interviews, and a layered Maurice White portrait. Skip it if you want a tightly focused, unconventional reappraisal that lingers on performances instead of...
Pros: ending satisfaction, drama quality
Cons: runtime, originality
Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...
Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material
Cons: none