If you want better realism
Choose The Furious. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for realism, with a 4.0 overall score.
Fall 2: Deadpoint Movie Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for big-screen vertigo, tense climbing set pieces, and committed leads. Skip it if repetitive sequel plotting, implausible decisions, weak character writing, or uneven effects quickly pull you out of a thriller.
Best for
Best for survival-thriller fans who want another dose of acrophobia, big-screen scale, and tense climbing set pieces and can forgive pulpy logic.
Not for
Skip it if you need fresh plotting, believable character decisions, deep characterization, or consistently convincing visual effects.
Verdict
Fall 2: Deadpoint works best when it keeps Jax and Luce exposed on failing planks and lets height do the frightening. Cinematography, POV shots, physical set pieces, and committed performances repeatedly stand out, and even harsh reactions acknowledge sweaty-palmed moments. The tradeoff is a script that too often repeats Fall, rushes or pads its setup, underdevelops the characters, and piles on twists that strain credibility. Visual effects also swing from convincing to obviously artificial. It remains a viable B-movie survival ride for acrophobia-driven thrills, but it is much less convincing when the story and characters have to carry the same weight as the drop.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
46 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.01 (2%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (26%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.416 (35%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.415 (33%)
-
Very negative below 1.52 (4%)
Pros
-
Height-based suspense is the clearest consensus strength. Even many negative reviews admit that POV shots, unstable planks, exposed drops, and a few standout set pieces can produce sweaty palms and real anxiety.
-
As a survival thriller, the movie usually delivers enough vertigo, physical danger, and nail-biting set pieces to satisfy genre fans. The weakest reactions come from reviewers who feel the repetition and writing blunt those strengths.
-
The best climbing set pieces turn simple movement into white-knuckle action, with monkey-bar crossings and exposed traversals repeatedly singled out. Some later action grows exaggerated or less inventive than the original.
-
Harriet Slater's lead work is one of the more consistent strengths, with praise for vulnerability, determination, and believable fear. Even a more negative take still found her performance acceptable.
-
Arsema Thomas and Tom Brittney receive strong praise when singled out, with Thomas described as electric and Brittney as convincingly authoritative.
-
The cast generally earns more praise than the script, especially for selling fear and keeping thin material watchable. A minority found the performances merely adequate or poorly calibrated to the danger.
Cons
-
Plausibility is a major weakness, especially the characters' decision to attempt the climb and the escalating late twists. Even positive reviews often ask viewers to accept foolish choices and strained survival logic.
-
The screenplay is the most repeated source of criticism, with predictable beats, shaky logic, forced exposition, and overcomplicated twists. A few reviewers find enough intrigue or playful pulp to keep it afloat.
-
Repetition of Fall is one of the most consistent complaints. Reviewers repeatedly describe the sequel as familiar, copied, by-the-numbers, or too faithful to the original's structure, with only a few seeing meaningful evolution.
-
Dialogue is widely criticized as basic, clichéd, repetitive, or overly expositional. Even favorable reviews tend to credit the actors with elevating lines that give them limited help.
-
Character writing is a persistent weakness: Jax and Luce are often described as thin, trope-driven, or underexplored. A few reviewers found enough growth and rooting interest to make the survival stakes work.
-
The story is generally seen as weaker than the central survival concept, with contrivances, shallow backstory, and unnecessary crime elements drawing criticism. A smaller group finds the basic sequel story solid enough for the ride.
Cast & Creators
-
JaxHarriet Slater is frequently praised for making Jax vulnerable, likable, and believably terrified even when the writing strains credibility. A few reviewers are cooler on the performance, but most see her as a stabilizing strength.
-
LuceArsema Thomas often elevates Luce beyond thin material, with praise ranging from likable and energetic to a true breakthrough performance. One negative review finds the acting poorly calibrated, but the overall response is strongly positive.
-
CinematographerAndrew Strahorn's cinematography is repeatedly praised for vertigo-inducing POV shots, wide landscapes, and a strong sense of exposed height. His work is one of the movie's clearest technical strengths.
-
DirectorMichael Spierig's direction gets mixed-to-positive marks: strong technical control and tension-building are balanced by criticism that the sequel lacks imagination in places.
-
DirectorPeter Spierig's direction gets mixed-to-positive marks: strong technical control and tension-building are balanced by criticism that the sequel lacks imagination in places.
-
JohnTom Brittney is singled out for giving John a convincing sense of authority even when the character's motives are intentionally questionable.
View all 46 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in runtime, value for money, supporting cast performance, near average in acting performance, suspense, below average in realism, emotional impact, age appropriateness.
Comparison summary
46 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher3 (7%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts9 (20%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower34 (74%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| realism | 1.8 | 3.3 | -1.5 |
| emotional impact | 2.1 | 3.8 | -1.7 |
| age appropriateness | 1.0 | 2.9 | -1.9 |
| chemistry between characters | 2.4 | 4.1 | -1.7 |
| sound design | 2.6 | 4.1 | -1.5 |
| family friendliness | 1.0 | 2.6 | -1.6 |
| cultural representation | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| story quality | 2.1 | 3.2 | -1.0 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better screenplay quality
Choose Exit 8. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for screenplay quality, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better ending satisfaction
Choose Runner. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for ending satisfaction, with a 3.6 overall score.
If you want better age appropriateness
Choose The Rip. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for age appropriateness, with a 3.7 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Fall
- Similar: story structure The sequel follows Fall's structure too faithfully and loses freshness.
- Better: novelty and precision Deadpoint still works for acrophobia, but it lacks Fall's surprise and precision.
- Similar: overall formula The sequel is criticized as largely the same old formula as Fall.
Cliffhanger
- Better: climbing suspense The reviewer says Cliffhanger handles impossible climbing scenarios far better.
- Similar: action-adventure tone The sequel pushes further into action-adventure territory reminiscent of Cliffhanger.
A Lonely Place to Die
- Better: climbing suspense The reviewer says other climbing thrillers handle impossible scenarios much better.
FAQ
Is Fall 2: Deadpoint scary?
It can be, especially for viewers with a fear of heights. POV shots, exposed drops, unstable planks, and a few standout climbing sequences repeatedly triggered strong physical unease.
Do I need to watch Fall first?
Not strictly. One review notes that the sequel explains the earlier events and expands on Shiloh and Jax's relationship, though familiarity with Fall makes the repeated story beats and returning characters more meaningful.
Is it as good as the first Fall?
Most reactions say no. The sequel keeps the vertigo-driven thrills, but familiar plotting, weaker character work, and less convincing logic are common reasons it is judged below the original.
How are the performances?
Generally better received than the writing. Harriet Slater and Arsema Thomas are often praised for selling the fear and giving thin material more emotional credibility, with Tom Brittney also earning positive notice.
Are the visual effects convincing?
They are inconsistent. Some reviewers find the height illusion convincing or improved, while others say green-screen backgrounds and CGI noticeably break immersion.
Is Fall 2: Deadpoint suitable for kids?
One family-focused review says no, citing strong profanity, drug material, violence, and intense peril as reasons it is better suited to adults and older viewers.
Does the ending set up another movie?
Yes. Multiple reviews describe a clear third-film setup, although reactions to the late twists and franchise tease range from intrigued to baffled.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
aisleseat.com
Exercise your consumer right to opt out
- Review score
- 3.9
sterkinekor.com
Overwhelmed by her sister Hunter’s death, Jax connects with Luce, Hunter’s fearless friend. To heal,...
- Review score
- 2.3
film-authority.com
‘…there’s an immersive element to the first film that’s less effective this time around; the contrivances to get the characters into their...
- Review score
- 2.7
growomaha.com
The original turned a simple climb into a nerve-rattling thriller. Fall 2: Deadpoint piles on backstory, smuggling and unnecessary plot while...
- Review score
- 2.1
filmfocusonline.com
If you’re not a lover of heights, consider yourself warned. Fall 2 is enough to keep any thrill-seekers white-knuckled on the edge of their...
- Review score
- 4.2
Top Movies to Consider
Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...
Pros: plot clarity, realism
Cons: plot originality, runtime
Best for an intimate, inventive archival portrait with strong emotional and cultural impact. Skip it if substantial nudity or an occasionally wandering biographical structure will frustrate you.
Pros: chemistry between characters, emotional impact
Cons: runtime, plot clarity
Best for an audacious, text-driven conspiracy thriller with gorgeous 16mm atmosphere and mounting dread. Skip it if long stretches of reading, deliberate repetition, and an intentionally austere narrative sound more...
Pros: story quality, plot clarity
Cons: chemistry between characters, sound design
Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...
Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction
Cons: runtime, pacing