The Death of Robin Hood

The Death of Robin Hood Movie Review

Brand: A24
Released: June 19, 2026
Updated: 1 month ago
3.4
Overall review score
197
Review evidence points
45
Scored features
45
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for Hugh Jackman’s commanding performance, striking medieval imagery, and a thoughtful redemption story. Skip it if graphic child-killing, relentless gloom, or a very slow second half will outweigh the craft.

Best for

Best for viewers who enjoy austere period dramas, revisionist folklore, strong acting, and morally serious stories about guilt and redemption. Its visual and sound design reward theatrical viewing.

Not for

Skip it if you want a traditional swashbuckling Robin Hood adventure, brisk pacing, humor, or family-friendly action. The child deaths and graphic gore are especially difficult.

Verdict

Michael Sarnoski’s revisionist Robin Hood is a visually formidable, morally severe character study anchored by one of Hugh Jackman’s strongest dramatic performances. Reviewers consistently praise the textured cinematography, mournful score, committed ensemble, and the bold decision to replace swashbuckling heroics with guilt, mortality, and the cost of violence. The divide comes after the brutal opening: admirers find the quieter priory section haunting and emotionally rich, while detractors see an overlong, underwritten slog that withholds too much of Robin’s inner life. The graphic violence is unusually punishing, and the film’s humorless tone narrows its audience. At its best, it is a beautiful, thoughtful dismantling of a legend; at its worst, its solemnity feels like a substitute for dramatic momentum.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

45 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    14 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    10 (22%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (29%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (13%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The cinematography is one of the clearest strengths, with ravishing landscapes, textured 35mm imagery, expressive aspect-ratio changes, and striking contrasts between mud-dark violence and island light.
  • 4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    The visual style is a major consensus strength, moving from volcanic darkness, mud, and fire to pastoral light, sea, and stone. The tactile compositions give the film a distinctive, mournful beauty.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The cast is broadly praised for committed, emotionally grounded work, even by reviewers who disliked the film. The performances often keep the severe material watchable when the story stalls.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    score quality: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Jim Ghedi’s folk-inflected score is widely praised for its mournful power. It deepens the old-world atmosphere and gives the film emotional lift when the drama turns sparse.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    action sequences: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The opening combat is savage, messy, and physically convincing rather than heroic or polished. Reviewers admired the stunt work and impact, though the brutality can be exhausting.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    theme depth: 4.2, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film’s richest material examines how stories reshape violence, whether redemption can be earned, and what a legacy costs. Many reviewers find those themes compelling even when the narrative treatment feels incomplete.

Cons

  • 1.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    violence level: 1.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The violence is graphic, ugly, and frequently upsetting, especially in the first act. Even reviewers who admire its purpose warn that the gore and child deaths may be too much for many viewers.
  • 1.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 1.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Pacing is the most repeated complaint. The deliberate shift from a violent opening to a quiet priory drama works for some, but many describe the middle as sluggish, restless, or ponderous.
  • 2.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    character development: 2.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Robin’s late-life reckoning intrigues reviewers, but many find his inner change too remote, vague, or convenient. The redemption arc works best when grounded in his relationships with Brigid and the children.
  • 1.2
    1 review
    family friendliness: 1.2, 1 review
    This is not family-friendly Robin Hood material. Strong bloody violence, child deaths, despair, and a relentlessly adult tone make it unsuitable for casual family viewing.
  • 1.2
    1 review
    humor: 1.2, 1 review
    The movie is nearly humorless, and some reviewers see that severity as a weakness. Its rare flashes of macabre personality come mostly through Little John rather than comic relief.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 2.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Entertainment value is sharply divided: admirers appreciate the reflective mood and unconventional structure, while detractors call it a joyless slog. It is not designed as a breezy or action-heavy crowd-pleaser.

Cast & Creators

  • Robin Hood
    4.5
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Hugh Jackman: 4.5, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Jackman earns broad praise for a physically imposing yet inward performance that carries menace, exhaustion, regret, and flashes of tenderness. Many reviewers rank it among his strongest dramatic roles.
  • Sister Brigid
    4.5
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Jodie Comer: 4.5, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Comer is repeatedly described as luminous, tender, restrained, and emotionally intelligent. Some critics wish Sister Brigid were written with more depth, but her presence consistently softens and steadies the film.
  • Little John
    4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Bill Skarsgård: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Skarsgård makes Little John memorable through hulking physicality, macabre humor, and volatile energy. Reviewers often praise him while wishing the brief role had more room.
  • The Leper
    4.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    Murray Bartlett: 4.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Bartlett’s hidden, philosophical leper is often called a standout and the soul of the priory section. A minority view finds the character reduced to empty platitudes.
  • Margaret
    4.5
    1 review
    Faith Delaney: 4.5, 1 review
    Delaney is praised for a compelling, emotionally precise performance as Margaret. Her quiet bond with Robin supplies some of the film’s most tender and human moments.
  • Arthur / Godwyn
    3.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Noah Jupe: 3.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Jupe’s restrained work is appreciated, especially when he communicates pain with limited dialogue. Reviewers also feel the film underuses both the actor and his revenge-driven character.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in plot originality, action sequences, value for money, near average in story quality, ending satisfaction, below average in humor, violence level, family friendliness.

Comparison summary

45 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    19 (42%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    17 (38%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
humor 1.2 3.7 -2.5
violence level 1.6 3.1 -1.5
family friendliness 1.2 2.9 -1.7
plot originality 4.8 3.1 +1.7
message quality 2.0 3.7 -1.7
age appropriateness 1.5 3.1 -1.6
pacing 1.9 2.9 -1.0
entertainment value 2.5 3.7 -1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better family friendliness

Choose Project Hail Mary. It scores 4.8 vs 1.2 for family friendliness, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better humor

Choose Crime 101. It scores 4.8 vs 1.2 for humor, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better critic appeal

Choose Leviticus. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for critic appeal, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better violence level

Choose Girls Like Girls. It scores 5.0 vs 1.6 for violence level, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

FAQ

Is this a traditional Robin Hood adventure?

No. It dismantles the heroic legend and presents Robin as an aging killer confronting guilt, mortality, and the stories built around his name.

How violent is The Death of Robin Hood?

Extremely violent in its first act, with graphic weapon injuries, gore, and deaths involving children. The second half becomes much quieter and more contemplative.

Is Hugh Jackman’s performance worth seeing?

Yes. Even many negative reviews praise his physical commitment, weary intensity, and restrained emotional work as the film’s strongest element.

Does the movie have slow pacing?

Yes. After the brutal opening, it shifts into a deliberate priory-set character drama, and many reviewers found that section sluggish or overlong.

Should it be seen in a theater?

The large landscapes, textured cinematography, forceful sound, and mournful score benefit from a theatrical presentation, though the slow structure may still test patience.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

wearemoviegeeks.com

THE DEATH OF ROBIN HOOD is a far cry from the familiar myth of men in green tights, with a stern, wild-haired Hugh Jackman playing an aging...

Review score
4.1

Top Movies to Consider

#1 Disneyland Handcrafted
4.8

Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...

Pros: plot clarity, realism

Cons: plot originality, runtime

#2 Remake
4.8

Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...

Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction

Cons: runtime, pacing

#4 Mary Oliver: Saved by the Beauty of the World
4.7

Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...

Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material

Cons: none