The Death of Robin Hood

The Death of Robin Hood Movie Review

Studio: A24
Released: June 19, 2026
Updated: 3 months ago
3.4
Overall review score
196
Review insights
44
Scored features
45
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for Hugh Jackman’s commanding performance, striking medieval imagery, and a thoughtful redemption story. Skip it if graphic child-killing, relentless gloom, or a very slow second half will outweigh the craft.

Best for

Best for viewers who enjoy austere period dramas, revisionist folklore, strong acting, and morally serious stories about guilt and redemption. Its visual and sound design reward theatrical viewing.

Not for

Skip it if you want a traditional swashbuckling Robin Hood adventure, brisk pacing, humor, or family-friendly action. The child deaths and graphic gore are especially difficult.

Verdict

Michael Sarnoski’s revisionist Robin Hood is a visually formidable, morally severe character study anchored by one of Hugh Jackman’s strongest dramatic performances. Reviewers consistently praise the textured cinematography, mournful score, committed ensemble, and the bold decision to replace swashbuckling heroics with guilt, mortality, and the cost of violence. The divide comes after the brutal opening: admirers find the quieter priory section haunting and emotionally rich, while detractors see an overlong, underwritten slog that withholds too much of Robin’s inner life. The graphic violence is unusually punishing, and the film’s humorless tone narrows its audience. At its best, it is a beautiful, thoughtful dismantling of a legend; at its worst, its solemnity feels like a substitute for dramatic momentum.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

44 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (30%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    10 (23%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (30%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (14%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (5%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    The visual style is a major consensus strength, moving from volcanic darkness, mud, and fire to pastoral light, sea, and stone. The tactile compositions give the film a distinctive, mournful beauty.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The cinematography is one of the clearest strengths, with ravishing landscapes, textured 35mm imagery, expressive aspect-ratio changes, and striking contrasts between mud-dark violence and island light.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The cast is broadly praised for committed, emotionally grounded work, even by reviewers who disliked the film. The performances often keep the severe material watchable when the story stalls.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The plot overturns familiar Robin Hood expectations by treating the legend as a lie and focusing on guilt, mortality, and the end of violence. That subversion is one of its strongest creative choices.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    theme depth: 4.2, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film’s richest material examines how stories reshape violence, whether redemption can be earned, and what a legacy costs. Many reviewers find those themes compelling even when the narrative treatment feels incomplete.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    action sequence quality: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The opening combat is savage, messy, and physically convincing rather than heroic or polished. Reviewers admired the stunt work and impact, though the brutality can be exhausting.

Cons highlights

  • 3.0
    25 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.0, 25 reviews, low consensus
    The story is the main dividing line: supporters call it profound, moving, and inventive, while detractors find it thin, vague, and dramatically inert. Nearly everyone agrees it is a radical departure from familiar Robin Hood adventures.
  • 1.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 1.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Pacing is the most repeated complaint. The deliberate shift from a violent opening to a quiet priory drama works for some, but many describe the middle as sluggish, restless, or ponderous.
  • 1.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    violence level: 1.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The violence is graphic, ugly, and frequently upsetting, especially in the first act. Even reviewers who admire its purpose warn that the gore and child deaths may be too much for many viewers.
  • 3.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 3.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Several reviewers found the redemption story haunting, tender, and unexpectedly moving. Others felt the film’s coldness, thin characterization, and slow middle prevented the intended emotions from landing.
  • 3.2
    8 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.2, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The final image and thematic resolution moved some reviewers with their beauty and restraint. Others found the ending rushed, underexplored, or unable to deliver the emotional punch it promises.
  • 3.2
    8 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 3.2, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The movie commits fully to melancholy, austerity, and moral seriousness. That consistency impresses some viewers, while others find the unbroken dourness suffocating and lifeless.

Cast & Creators

  • Robin Hood
    4.5
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Hugh Jackman: 4.5, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Jackman earns broad praise for a physically imposing yet inward performance that carries menace, exhaustion, regret, and flashes of tenderness. Many reviewers rank it among his strongest dramatic roles.
  • Sister Brigid
    4.5
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Jodie Comer: 4.5, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Comer is repeatedly described as luminous, tender, restrained, and emotionally intelligent. Some critics wish Sister Brigid were written with more depth, but her presence consistently softens and steadies the film.
  • Little John
    4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Bill Skarsgård: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Skarsgård makes Little John memorable through hulking physicality, macabre humor, and volatile energy. Reviewers often praise him while wishing the brief role had more room.
  • The Leper
    4.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    Murray Bartlett: 4.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Bartlett’s hidden, philosophical leper is often called a standout and the soul of the priory section. A minority view finds the character reduced to empty platitudes.
  • Margaret
    4.5
    1 review
    Faith Delaney: 4.5, 1 review
    Delaney is praised for a compelling, emotionally precise performance as Margaret. Her quiet bond with Robin supplies some of the film’s most tender and human moments.
  • Arthur / Godwyn
    3.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Noah Jupe: 3.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Jupe’s restrained work is appreciated, especially when he communicates pain with limited dialogue. Reviewers also feel the film underuses both the actor and his revenge-driven character.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in originality, historical accuracy, faithfulness to source material, near average in story quality, supporting cast performance, below average in humor, violence level, message quality.

Comparison summary

44 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    16 (36%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    10 (23%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    18 (41%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
humor 1.2 3.8 -2.6
violence level 1.6 3.1 -1.5
message quality 2.0 3.7 -1.7
pacing 1.9 2.9 -1.0
entertainment value 2.5 3.7 -1.2
audience appeal 2.6 3.8 -1.2
family friendliness 1.2 2.5 -1.3
age appropriateness 1.5 2.7 -1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better message quality

Choose The Weight. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for message quality, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better family friendliness

Choose Project Hail Mary. It scores 4.8 vs 1.2 for family friendliness, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better critic appeal

Choose The Sheep Detectives. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for critic appeal, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better humor

Choose Crime 101. It scores 4.8 vs 1.2 for humor, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

FAQ

Is this a traditional Robin Hood adventure?

No. It dismantles the heroic legend and presents Robin as an aging killer confronting guilt, mortality, and the stories built around his name.

How violent is The Death of Robin Hood?

Extremely violent in its first act, with graphic weapon injuries, gore, and deaths involving children. The second half becomes much quieter and more contemplative.

Is Hugh Jackman’s performance worth seeing?

Yes. Even many negative reviews praise his physical commitment, weary intensity, and restrained emotional work as the film’s strongest element.

Does the movie have slow pacing?

Yes. After the brutal opening, it shifts into a deliberate priory-set character drama, and many reviewers found that section sluggish or overlong.

Should it be seen in a theater?

The large landscapes, textured cinematography, forceful sound, and mournful score benefit from a theatrical presentation, though the slow structure may still test patience.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

wearemoviegeeks.com

THE DEATH OF ROBIN HOOD is a far cry from the familiar myth of men in green tights, with a stern, wild-haired Hugh Jackman playing an aging...

Review score
4.2

Top Movies to Consider

#1 You Can See Everything
4.7

Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.

Pros: originality, humor

#2 Chronovisor
4.7

Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.

Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography

Cons: audience appeal

#3 Remake
4.6

Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.

Pros: emotional impact, theme depth

#4 Halloween
4.6

Best for patient suspense, an unforgettable score, and an unsettling masked killer. Skip it for very young children or if you want to avoid intense scares; its restrained kills also...

Pros: directing quality, score quality

Cons: message quality