The Wolf Among Us Remastered

The Wolf Among Us Remastered Feature Scores

Explore all 67 feature scores for The Wolf Among Us Remastered, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

67 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    29 (43%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    22 (33%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (10%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (13%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    19 reviews strong consensus
    narrative quality: 5.0, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The central murder mystery is widely praised for its enduring tension, morally difficult decisions and memorable fairy-tale reinterpretations. It remains compelling even for players who already know its twists.
  • 4.7
    23 reviews strong consensus
    overall quality: 4.7, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    A gripping fairy-tale murder mystery remains the main attraction, backed by a memorable cast and striking comic book presentation. The remaster earns broad approval despite dated mechanics and uneven technical cleanup.
  • 4.8
    17 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.8, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    The neon-soaked comic book style remains a defining strength, and most praise the update for preserving it. Relighting occasionally changes the mood or softens the appeal of a familiar design.
  • 4.6
    22 reviews strong consensus
    graphics quality: 4.6, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    The visual overhaul usually impresses most in detailed character models, textures and redesigned locations. Some changes are subtler than expected, and a few character designs or lighting choices lose a little of the original charm.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    voice acting: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Strong performances bring warmth, menace and emotional weight to the cast. The voices remain a major strength, with additional praise for clearer remastered presentation.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    performance optimization: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Updated performance generally removes much of the lag and hitching associated with the original. Strong PC results and several smooth playthroughs support the upgrade, although not every technical issue has disappeared.
  • 4.6
    16 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 4.6, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Redrawn textures, added props and more dimensional objects give Fabletown extra depth. Apartments, offices and street scenes feel more detailed and lived in without losing their stylized character.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The story builds empathy for compromised characters and gives decisions emotional weight. Familiar scenes and Bigby’s moral struggle can still provoke a strong response on replay.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    immersion: 4.6, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    The mystery, evocative setting and stronger presentation readily pull players into Fabletown. Rough bonus-scene behavior occasionally breaks that spell, while smoother campaign performance helps preserve it.
  • 4.4
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    remake/remaster quality: 4.4, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sharper models, richer environments and generally smoother performance make this a welcome return to Fabletown. The update preserves the original adventure closely, so its appeal depends partly on how much you value presentation changes and extras.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    character roster: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Fabletown’s memorable, varied cast is a consistent attraction. Reinterpreted fairy-tale figures contribute personality and make the mystery more involving.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The brooding score is repeatedly praised as an ideal match for Fabletown’s noir setting. Its synths, bass and tension remain memorable, with especially enthusiastic headphone impressions.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Sharp dialogue and mature social themes help the writing hold up years later. Its treatment of corruption and compromised characters gives the fairy-tale premise serious dramatic weight.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    world-building: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The fairy-tale community gains depth from its human problems, social divisions and distinctive locations. Its reimagined folklore gives the detective story an unusually compelling world.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    atmosphere: 4.7, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Fabletown’s grimy neon atmosphere remains a major draw, strengthened by richer settings and effective audio. Some relighting choices brighten scenes in ways that weaken their original mood.
  • 4.3
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    replay value: 4.3, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reactive conversations and alternative decisions help the familiar mystery remain rewarding on replay. Its unchanged main story and limited broader consequences reduce novelty for some, while the extras give others a fresh incentive.
  • 4.3
    13 reviews low consensus
    choice impact: 4.3, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Decisions often feel meaningful through character reactions, relationships and individual fates. Their limited influence on the larger storyline leaves some players wishing for further-reaching consequences.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    commentary quality: 4.4, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The development interviews generally offer enjoyable insight into how the game and remaster were made. One account finds their production and audio disappointing, so the archival presentation is less consistently admired than the subject matter.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    frame rate stability: 4.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Most accounts describe a much smoother experience with fewer old scene hitches and frame-rate problems. Occasional stutter and one report of choppy transitions show that improvement is not universal.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The relatively low asking price and owner discounts make the remaster attractive to several reviewers. Others argue that modest extras still do not justify paying again for an adventure they already own.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Revisiting Fabletown is repeatedly described as fun and absorbing. Even the modest playable extras provide enjoyable moments for some fans.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    protagonist appeal: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Bigby stands out for the tension between his violent past and his responsibilities as sheriff. His gruff personality and struggle to reform remain central to the game’s appeal.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    side character depth: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Supporting characters feel like troubled individuals rather than simple versions of familiar fairy tales. Their personal circumstances and reactions help players understand and remember them.
  • 3.9
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    content variety: 3.9, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    Playable deleted scenes, development videos and art archives provide welcome reasons to explore beyond the campaign. Reactions range from delighted appreciation to disappointment with the small amount or unfinished state of the additions.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Bigby’s redemption and the cast’s reactions give the story more depth than a simple murder investigation. Character relationships and changing attitudes help personal decisions matter.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to franchise: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The adaptation is praised for respecting the comics’ characters and preserving the original game’s artistic identity. Its familiar figures retain their distinctive personalities through the update.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    collector appeal: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The concept art and archival material can make the package feel like a collector’s edition. These additions have their strongest appeal for devoted fans rather than every previous owner.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    controls responsiveness: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Movement and timed inputs are reported as dependable, with fewer performance-related failures. Smooth responses help QTE mistakes feel attributable to the player rather than the game.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    sound design: 4.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    City ambience, clearer voices and forceful effects enrich the presentation. Abrupt volume changes and poor audio in some bonus interviews prevent a uniformly polished result.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    facial animations: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Improved lip synchronization and more fluid expressions make conversations feel more nuanced. Small facial details give the updated characters additional personality.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    exploration quality: 4.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Hands-on clue hunting offers a welcome link to classic point-and-click adventures. Inspecting objects can feel slow or cumbersome, even when the observations add useful character insight.
  • 3.6
    14 reviews low consensus
    animation quality: 3.6, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Animation draws sharply different reactions: some find smoother movement and better transitions, while others still see wooden, robotic gestures. The improved character models can make the remaining stiffness stand out.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Some find the episodes flow seamlessly between conversation, investigation and action. Others criticize a late slowdown, especially when the fourth episode repeats information already uncovered.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    world interactivity: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Inspecting clues and objects gives the detective work welcome hands-on involvement. Some interactions feel slow, but the observations and item uses add character insight and narrative relevance.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    achievement list quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The platinum trophy is a clearly appreciated part of the package. Its presence adds appeal alongside the remaster’s other additions.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    character diversity: 5.0, 1 review
    The cast is praised as both wonderful and diverse. Its range of fairy-tale personalities strengthens the adaptation.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    checkpoint system: 5.0, 1 review
    Frequent checkpoints quickly return players to action after a missed input. They reduce the penalty for failing a timed sequence.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    dialogue quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Emotionally charged conversations use fairy-tale language without becoming corny. The dialogue helps keep the strange setting grounded in human stakes.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Enemy design: 5.0, 1 review
    Grendel’s more distinctive scales and creature detail make the confrontation visually more impressive. The redesign is admired for enhancing the monster’s presence.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    handheld play suitability: 5.0, 1 review
    The game is reported to play very well on Steam Deck even at high settings. That account supports enjoying the full adventure on a handheld.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    level design: 5.0, 1 review
    Locations are praised for reflecting the lives and personalities of their inhabitants. Detailed apartments, offices and bars contribute to the storytelling as well as the visual appeal.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    originality: 5.0, 1 review
    The unusual fairy-tale community is a standout source of originality. Its familiar characters living under grim real-world pressures make the setting distinctive.
  • 3.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    QTE design: 3.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Timed action sequences keep some players involved and punctuate the conversations effectively. Others find the same design archaic or sluggish, even when execution is smoother.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    community features: 4.0, 1 review
    Seeing how other players handled the same decisions is a welcome touch. The choice statistics add perspective to a personal playthrough.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    content completeness: 4.0, 1 review
    The existing adventure feels complete despite the absence of a newly written main story. The appeal rests on a satisfying full experience rather than an expanded plot.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    humor: 4.0, 1 review
    Unfinished animations and voices can make the deleted scenes unexpectedly hilarious. The amusement comes from seeing the work in progress rather than a polished comedy presentation.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    lore depth: 4.0, 1 review
    Deleted dialogue adds interesting pieces of lore and further context around the familiar story. Its value is as an extra perspective rather than a replacement for the finished narrative.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    movement feel: 4.0, 1 review
    Bigby’s movement through the environments works without trouble in the account that specifically assesses it. Navigation does not interfere with that player’s investigation.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    narrative tone consistency: 4.0, 1 review
    Harsh language largely feels authentic to characters living under difficult circumstances. Its contextual fit makes it easier to accept than gratuitous swearing would be.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    combat system: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The QTE-based fights engage some players and add welcome action between investigations. Others find those same sequences slow and janky.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    crash stability: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Crash reports differ: one full playthrough has no hard crashes, while another encounters lockups after pausing fails. Reliability is improved in places but cannot be assumed flawless.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    HUD clarity: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Monochrome presentation can reduce the visibility of dialogue timers and directional prompts. The regular color mode is easier to read in the accounts that raise this concern.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cutscene skippability: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The inability to skip or fast-forward scenes remains a missed convenience. Repeating already-heard dialogue is particularly frustrating on another playthrough.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    menu usability: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The extras interface can feel old-fashioned and less useful than it should. A separate playback-menu problem repeatedly distracts from otherwise interesting development videos.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    accessibility options: 2.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Fast dialogue timers and limited subtitle adjustments remain obstacles, despite some useful QTE input options. Missing controls for text contrast or reading time are more consequential than the visual refresh for players who need them.
  • 2.6
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    polish: 2.6, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The main presentation gains smoother transitions and considerable visual polish, but cleanup is incomplete. Unfinished deleted scenes and lingering interface or animation problems remain conspicuous rough edges.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    audio settings: 2.0, 1 review
    The absence of dynamic-range controls or speaker presets is frustrating when action and music become suddenly loud. More detailed tuning would help balance the remastered audio.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    combat readability: 2.0, 1 review
    Directional prompts become harder to spot in Noir Mode. Keeping the regular colors improves readability during the timed action.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    cutscene visual quality: 2.0, 1 review
    Some elaborate scenes still fall short of an impressive modern presentation. Higher resolution alone does not resolve every visual limitation in the cinematics.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    graphics settings: 2.0, 1 review
    An initial mouse-positioning bug prevents access to the resolution setting in one PC account. The problem makes a basic display adjustment frustrating.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    user interface design: 2.0, 1 review
    Color-coded subtitles can blend into similarly colored backgrounds. The lack of better contrast options makes some conversations unnecessarily hard to read.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    pause functionality: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Pausing can create time to read and consider dialogue choices. A separate playthrough encountered a serious bug where action continued behind the pause menu and eventually locked up.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    load times: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Loading remains noticeably long in two accounts, even after the visual update. Another PS5 assessment describes the old loading weaknesses as improved, so impressions are not uniform.
  • 2.9
    8 reviews low consensus
    bug frequency: 2.9, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Residual problems include texture loading, an inaccessible setting, login trouble and occasional scene glitches. Some players find the campaign clean, with the roughest behavior confined to the unfinished extras.
  • 3.0
    17 reviews low consensus
    Noir Mode: 3.0, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Noir Mode offers an atmospheric black-and-white alternative, particularly for repeat playthroughs. Many prefer the defining neon palette, and several find monochrome makes timers or directional prompts harder to read.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    game length: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    One player finds the story ends too quickly, while another considers the roughly two-hour episodes satisfying for a first visit. Expectations about campaign length shape that difference.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 3.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Conversation, clue hunting and timed action still form an engaging mix for some players. Others find the unchanged mechanics too simple or sluggish by modern standards.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.8
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Franchise newcomers: 4.8, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    For most first-time players, this is the recommended introduction to Bigby’s story, with stronger presentation around an acclaimed mystery. Its older mechanics may feel less impressive to those expecting a thoroughly modern adventure.
  • 4.4
    22 reviews moderate consensus
    Returning players: 4.4, 22 reviews, moderate consensus
    Returning fans can enjoy a visual refresh, rediscover smaller interactions and explore playable deleted scenes. The case for buying again weakens if familiar story content and optional archives are not enough of a draw.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Reflective narrative fans: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Players drawn to reflective stories can find substantial material in redemption, moral compromise and the failures of powerful institutions. Difficult choices invite consideration beyond simply solving the case.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Long play sessions: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The story can sustain a long uninterrupted session, with one player finishing it in a day. Another finds the episodic pacing works just as well when the chapters are played continuously.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Plot-twist seekers: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Red herrings, difficult decisions and an effective whodunnit make the game rewarding for players seeking twists. The mystery supplies more than a straightforward hunt for a culprit.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Handheld gaming: 5.0, 1 review
    A positive Steam Deck playthrough makes this a promising handheld option. High settings remain practical in the account that tests that device.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Headphone gaming: 5.0, 1 review
    Headphones bring out the soundtrack’s bass and tense high notes particularly well. They also reduce the abrupt-volume problem encountered through basic TV speakers.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Point-and-click adventure fans: 5.0, 1 review
    The detective sequences retain the spirit of classic point-and-click adventures through clue inspection and item interactions. Fans of that style get meaningful investigation alongside the dialogue choices.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Trophy hunting: 5.0, 1 review
    Trophy-focused players get a positively received platinum trophy to pursue. The trophy offering is specifically cited as part of the recommendation.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Gaming with limited free time: 4.0, 1 review
    One assessment finds the roughly 90-minute episodes make catching up manageable. That structure can suit players fitting the story around limited free time.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Content-sensitive players
    1.0
    1 review
    Content-sensitive players: 1.0, 1 review
    Players put off by serious subject matter and profuse swearing are explicitly warned away. The grim tone is integral to the adventure rather than a minor optional element.
  • Time-pressure-sensitive players
    1.0
    1 review
    Time-pressure-sensitive players: 1.0, 1 review
    The dialogue timer can expire before slower readers have finished considering their options. Pausing offers a workaround in one account, but the lack of an adjustable timer makes the experience a poor fit for players who dislike time pressure.
  • Mouse and keyboard play
    2.0
    1 review
    Mouse and keyboard play: 2.0, 1 review
    One PC player cannot move the mouse far enough to reach the resolution control. That specific menu fault undermines an otherwise appealing PC version.
  • TV gaming
    2.0
    1 review
    TV gaming: 2.0, 1 review
    Basic TV speakers can make the jumps between dialogue, action and title music uncomfortable to manage. One player repeatedly reaches for the remote to adjust volume.