Best 2025 Entertainment for directing quality

#1 A Merry Little Ex-mas
5.0

Steve Carr’s direction is a standout, using character-led staging and a relatively cringe-free comic rhythm to make the stronger bits feel organic rather than forced.

Pros: supporting cast performance, lead performance

Cons: humor, genre satisfaction

#2 Heart of the Beast
5.0

David Ayer handles the stripped down survival story with skill, though the ending and familiar plot leave a few viewers wanting more restraint.

Pros: cinematography, emotional impact

Cons: story quality, pacing

#3 Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Direction is praised for maintaining craft across the production and, in later episode coverage, for delivering a focused and driven installment even without arena games.

Pros: franchise connection, character development

Cons: story quality, sexual content level

#4 The Seduction
5.0

Direction earns strong praise for keeping complicated deceptions coherent and for making the intimate material visually purposeful rather than merely explicit.

Pros: visual style, character development

Cons: faithfulness to source material, season pacing

#5 The Beast In Me
5.0

Antonio Campos’s direction is praised as assured, particularly in the way it probes damaged characters and sustains unease through framing and pacing.

Pros: bingeability, main cast performance

Cons: plot twists, writing quality

#6 The Last First: Winter K2
4.9

Bar-Lev is widely praised for balancing compassion, accountability, and competing motives without reducing the story to simple heroes and villains. A few structural choices draw criticism, but the overall approach...

Pros: theme depth, message quality

Cons: character development

#7 IT: Welcome To Derry
4.8

Direction earns strong praise for atmosphere, visual control, and the show's most effective horror sequences.

Pros: genre satisfaction, acting quality

Cons: writing quality, CGI quality

#8 Pluribus, Season 1
4.8

Direction receives strong praise for precise blocking, staging, visual patience, and the confidence to let quiet scenes play out at length.

Pros: acting quality, story quality

Cons: season pacing, character likability

#9 Mayday
4.6

Goldstein and Daley are widely praised for energetic, confident staging and smart tonal control, though one dissenting review sees the storytelling as undercooked.

Pros: entertainment value, action sequences

Cons: rewatch value, runtime

#10 Weapons
4.5

Cregger’s control of viewpoint, staging, and abrupt tonal turns impresses many, even when the plotting divides them.

Pros: acting performance, scares

Cons: pacing, emotional impact

#11 Now You See Me: Now You Don’t
4.1

Ruben Fleischer is generally credited with brisk energy, visual flair, and a useful self-awareness about the franchise’s silliness. Less favorable takes find the style merely serviceable or limited by low-rent...

Pros: entertainment value, action sequences

Cons: genre satisfaction, realism

#12 The Housemaid
4.0

Paul Feig earns praise for managing tension and camp, but harsher critics fault his restraint, visual control, and handling of serious themes.

Pros: entertainment value, acting performance

Cons: plot originality, pacing

#13 What It Feels Like For A Girl, Season 1
4.0

Direction is more divisive than the performances: raw scenes and formal play are praised, while heavy visual motifs had mixed success. The show works best when style serves Byron’s inner...

Pros: story quality, main cast performance

Cons: audience appeal, age appropriateness

#14 Summerwater, Season 1
4.0

The direction is one of the more positive craft notes. The Standard praises the directors for drawing tension from the cramped interiors and grey Highland landscape.

Pros: suspense

Cons: entertainment value, story quality

#15 Goodbye June
3.8

Kate Winslet’s debut draws more praise than criticism for its actor-friendly restraint, intimate staging, and emotional control. Detractors find the approach prosaic, textbook, or insufficiently cinematic.

Pros: acting performance, emotional impact

Cons: screenplay quality, story quality

#16 Avatar: Fire and Ash
3.7

James Cameron’s command of spectacle remains formidable, though one harsh critic blamed the direction for weak emotional performances.

Pros: visual style, action sequences

Cons: plot originality, character development

#17 Beware Boiúna
3.0

Mike P. Nelson’s direction earns praise for finding fresh angles in familiar genre material, but the chaotic attack coverage also draws criticism for muddying the film’s visual logic. The strongest...

Pros: genre satisfaction, acting performance

Cons: entertainment value, character development

#18 My Secret Santa
3.0

Mike Rohl's direction was viewed as competent for the holiday genre, but not strong enough to push the film into exceptional territory.

Pros: lead performance, emotional impact

Cons: humor, originality

#19 Wicked: For Good
2.9

Jon M. Chu’s direction splits reviewers sharply. Some celebrate the scale, musical staging, and visual ambition, while others criticize conventional blocking, overstuffed frames, or a lack of cinematic spark.

Pros: lead performance, acting performance

Cons: story quality, soundtrack quality

#20 The Abandons
2.7

Direction gets mixed marks. Some reviews praise the visual handling and shootouts, while others fault flat staging, an uncertain dramatic mode, and badly handled action.

Pros: main cast performance, production design

Cons: character development, season pacing

#21 Squid Game: The Challenge, Season 2
1.5

Gareth Birkett’s first four episodes drew sharp criticism from one reviewer for failing to mask the show’s manufactured quality.

Pros: emotional impact, plot originality

Cons: entertainment value, character likability

#22 The Witcher, Season 4
1.0

One reviewer blamed the season’s staging and execution for failing to make key material convincing.

Pros: action quality, villain quality

Cons: entertainment value, faithfulness to source material