Mayday Movie Review

Studio: Apple TV
Released: September 4, 2025
Updated: 2 months ago
4.2
Overall review score
428
Review insights
47
Scored features
45
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose Mayday if you want a fast, funny buddy action-comedy with standout Kenneth Branagh, strong chemistry, and inventive set pieces. Skip it if Ryan Reynolds’ familiar wisecracking, predictable plotting, or mature violence are deal-breakers.

Best for

Best for viewers who enjoy old-school buddy action-comedies, inventive fight and chase staging, and character chemistry strong enough to carry a familiar plot.

Not for

Less suited to viewers tired of Ryan Reynolds’ sarcastic screen persona, those seeking deep Cold War politics or major originality, and families avoiding strong violence or profanity.

Verdict

Mayday succeeds most when it leans into the unlikely partnership between Ryan Reynolds and Kenneth Branagh. Reviewers repeatedly praise Branagh’s funny, warm, unexpectedly physical performance, the pair’s chemistry, and action staging that feels unusually cinematic for a streaming release. Fluid camerawork, well-choreographed fights, brisk momentum, and a Springsteen-heavy ’80s soundtrack give the familiar buddy-movie structure plenty of energy. The tradeoff is familiarity: several critics find the plot predictable, supporting characters underused, and Reynolds too close to his standard sarcastic persona. A few also object to uneven CGI, tonal silliness, or a simplified political message. Still, the dominant view is that the film’s heart, humor, and set pieces outweigh those limitations, making it a lively throwback rather than a genre reinvention.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

47 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    15 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (21%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (11%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.4
    41 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.4, 41 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most reviewers find Mayday highly entertaining, funny, and easy to enjoy, with only a small minority calling it forgettable or disappointing.
  • 4.7
    35 reviews strong consensus
    action sequence quality: 4.7, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    The action is one of the clearest consensus wins, with fluid fights, inventive chases, strong aerial work, and several set pieces ranked among the year’s best.
  • 4.1
    32 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 4.1, 32 reviews, moderate consensus
    The comedy usually lands through Branagh’s deadpan work, visual gags, and lead banter, but Reynolds fatigue and some broad third-act silliness divide reviewers.
  • 4.7
    31 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.7, 31 reviews, strong consensus
    Reynolds and Branagh’s odd-couple chemistry is repeatedly called the heart of the film, carrying the comedy, emotional beats, and long stretches of the story.
  • 4.1
    28 reviews low consensus
    lead performance: 4.1, 28 reviews, low consensus
    Branagh is the consistent standout and often scene-stealer. Reynolds is more divisive, praised when subdued but criticized when he falls back on his usual wisecracking persona.
  • 4.6
    23 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.6, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    As a throwback buddy action-comedy, the film strongly satisfies its target audience with banter, chases, fights, heart, and nostalgic genre energy.

Cons highlights

  • 2.9
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 2.9, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The buddy-road-movie structure is repeatedly described as familiar, predictable, and derivative even when reviewers enjoy how individual scenes are executed.
  • 2.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    rewatch value: 2.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Rewatch interest is split: some see an easy repeat-watch comfort movie, while others expect to forget it quickly or never revisit it.
  • 3.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    runtime: 3.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The nearly two-hour length works for some because of strong momentum, but several reviewers think the movie drags or would be better closer to 90 minutes.
  • 3.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The screenplay earns praise for smart genre writing and balanced character beats, but detractors call it safe, by-the-numbers, or even half-baked.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    historical accuracy: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Period authenticity is mixed: some reviewers feel the setting convincingly evokes 1987, while others say the dialogue, visuals, or atmosphere never fully feel like the era.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    CGI quality: 2.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Digital effects draw mixed reactions: most shots are convincing or good enough, but a few green-screen and cartoonish moments noticeably break immersion.

Cast & Creators

  • Nikolai Ustinov
    4.9
    44 reviews strong consensus
    Kenneth Branagh: 4.9, 44 reviews, strong consensus
    Branagh is the near-unanimous standout, earning praise for deadpan comedy, unexpected action credibility, warmth, and the emotional depth he gives Nikolai.
  • Director
    4.5
    28 reviews strong consensus
    John Francis Daley: 4.5, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Daley is widely praised with Goldstein for confident action-comedy direction, inventive camera work, and strong pacing, though one dissenting review finds the storytelling undercooked.
  • Director
    4.5
    28 reviews strong consensus
    Jonathan Goldstein: 4.5, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Goldstein is widely praised with Daley for confident action-comedy direction, inventive camera work, and strong pacing, though one dissenting review finds the storytelling undercooked.
  • Troy Kelly
    3.8
    44 reviews low consensus
    Ryan Reynolds: 3.8, 44 reviews, low consensus
    Reynolds divides reviewers: his charm and restrained straight-man work often fit the movie well, while critics tired of his familiar sarcastic persona see it as the film’s biggest limitation.
  • Cinematographer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Barry Peterson: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Peterson’s cinematography is repeatedly praised for fluid motion, cinematic scale, and action images that keep the film visually propulsive.
  • Alexander Volkov
    4.1
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Marcin Dorociński: 4.1, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Dorociński is generally praised for making Volkov a credible, intense threat without leaning too hard into a cartoonish Soviet villain, though one review finds him merely serviceable.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in sexual content level, pacing, action sequence quality, near average in lead performance, emotional impact, below average in score quality, rewatch value, world-building.

Comparison summary

47 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    25 (53%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (30%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    8 (17%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
sexual content level 5.0 2.8 +2.2
score quality 2.0 4.1 -2.1
pacing 4.6 3.0 +1.6
rewatch value 2.5 3.6 -1.1
action sequence quality 4.7 3.8 +0.8
world-building 2.5 3.7 -1.2
ending satisfaction 4.5 3.3 +1.2
violence level 2.0 3.2 -1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better score quality

Choose Crime 101. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for score quality, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better rewatch value

Choose The Furious. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for rewatch value, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better genre satisfaction

Choose Coyote vs. Acme. It scores 5.0 vs 4.6 for genre satisfaction, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better lead performance

Choose The Sheep Detectives. It scores 5.0 vs 4.1 for lead performance, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Atomic Blonde

  • Similar: action caliber The reviewer compares Mayday’s action caliber favorably to Atomic Blonde.

John Wick

  • Similar: action caliber The reviewer compares Mayday’s action caliber favorably to John Wick.

Lethal Weapon

  • Similar: overall action-comedy concept The reviewer describes Mayday as a hybrid of Top Gun and Lethal Weapon.

FAQ

Is Mayday mostly an action movie or a comedy?

It is both, but reviewers generally see action as the stronger half. The comedy comes from the Reynolds-Branagh odd-couple dynamic, while fights, chases, and aerial set pieces provide much of the momentum.

How is Kenneth Branagh in Mayday?

He is the clearest consensus standout. Reviewers praise his deadpan humor, warmth, surprising action credibility, and ability to give Nikolai more depth than the premise initially suggests.

Does Ryan Reynolds play his usual type of character?

Mostly yes. Some reviewers enjoy a more restrained version of his familiar wisecracking persona, while others consider that same shtick the movie’s biggest weakness.

Are the action scenes good?

Yes. The fights, aerial sequences, train action, and vehicle chases are repeatedly praised for choreography, fluid camera movement, and inventive staging.

Is the Cold War message deep?

The film’s empathy-first message about propaganda, patriotism, and seeing people beyond national stereotypes is often praised, but several critics find it simple or surface-level rather than deeply political.

Is Mayday appropriate for kids?

Family-focused reviews warn about bloody action, gunfire, stabbings, profanity, and other mature material. The content is better suited to older viewers than young children or sensitive audiences.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

theactionelite.com

Plot: Lieutenant Troy Brennan’s reconnaissance mission over Soviet territory goes awry, forcing him to crash-land and survive in Russian...

Review score
2.7
filmreviewdaily.com

A theatrical knight and a comic Canadian team up for a stylish, eminently diverting action-comedy packed with surprises.

Review score
4.9

Top Movies to Consider

#1 You Can See Everything
4.7

Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.

Pros: originality, humor

#2 Possible Love
4.7

Extraordinary performances and richly observed relationships make this a rewarding, emotionally forceful drama. Its nearly three-hour length and slow opening demand patience and undivided attention.

Pros: class commentary, character development

#3 Chronovisor
4.7

Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.

Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography

Cons: audience appeal

#4 Remake
4.6

Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.

Pros: emotional impact, theme depth