If you want better Bluetooth connectivity
Choose Garmin Forerunner 265. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Bluetooth connectivity, with a 4.0 overall score.
Garmin Forerunner 570 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Garmin Forerunner 570 for a bright, stylish training watch with excellent GPS, heart-rate accuracy, and coaching. Skip it if value, offline maps, ECG, or long always-on battery life matter most.
Best for
Best for runners, triathletes, and Garmin users who want a stylish, bright, accurate training watch with rich coaching and recovery tools. It also suits buyers who value 42mm and 47mm size choices.
Not for
Not for shoppers prioritizing the lowest price, full offline mapping, ECG, or maximum always-on battery life. Casual smartwatch users may also find it too sports-focused and expensive.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently framed the Garmin Forerunner 570 as an excellent sports watch with a more polished design, brighter AMOLED display, accurate GPS, and highly trusted heart-rate tracking. Its training tools, recovery guidance, workout variety, and improved smartwatch features make it feel more complete than earlier mid-range Forerunners. The tradeoff is value: many reviewers felt the higher price was hard to justify when battery life regressed with the brighter screen and Garmin still withheld offline maps and ECG. It works best as a premium-feeling runner and triathlon watch, not as the most feature-complete or budget-efficient Garmin.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
48 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.021 (44%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (35%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.46 (13%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (8%)
Pros highlights
-
Heart-rate accuracy was widely praised, often compared favorably with chest straps, though gym and cycling edge cases remained.
-
GPS accuracy was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for near-flawless tracks, reliable distance, and strong multi-band performance.
-
Comfort was mostly praised for lightness and long-wear feel, though larger-case sleep comfort bothered some reviewers.
-
Brightness was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the brighter AMOLED panel and outdoor readability.
-
Style and design were widely praised for a more colorful, expressive, premium-looking Forerunner, though one reviewer found it visually familiar.
-
Display quality was a clear highlight: reviewers liked the larger, sharper, vivid AMOLED screen and premium visual feel.
Cons highlights
-
Value for money was the main controversy: reviewers loved the watch but often said the price and omitted maps/ECG hurt its case.
-
Mapping and navigation drew the most consistent criticism: breadcrumb routing helped, but reviewers wanted full offline maps at this price.
-
Battery life split reviewers: it easily beat daily-charge smartwatches for some, but many noted regression from the 265 and short always-on runtimes.
-
ECG functionality was one of the most criticized omissions because the Gen 5 sensor made reviewers expect ECG at this price.
-
Sleep tracking accuracy was mixed: some found it reasonably accurate, while others found it less robust or weak at REM-stage tracking.
-
Health tracking accuracy was mixed: general metrics were useful, but reviewers criticized illness detection and Garmin’s sleep-stage limitations.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in size options, GPS accuracy, heart rate accuracy, near average in user interface, style and design, below average in Bluetooth connectivity, mapping and navigation, value for money.
Comparison summary
48 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher28 (58%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts11 (23%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower9 (19%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth connectivity | 2.0 | 3.7 | -1.7 |
| mapping and navigation | 2.1 | 3.4 | -1.3 |
| value for money | 2.7 | 3.8 | -1.2 |
| smartphone notifications | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| size options | 4.4 | 3.1 | +1.3 |
| ECG functionality | 1.6 | 2.6 | -1.0 |
| health tracking accuracy | 2.8 | 3.9 | -1.2 |
| battery life | 3.3 | 4.2 | -0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better battery life
Choose Huawei Watch Fit 4 Pro. It scores 4.7 vs 3.3 for battery life, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better pairing reliability
Choose Garmin Vivoactive 6. It scores 4.7 vs 3.4 for pairing reliability, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better health tracking accuracy
Choose Garmin Venu 3. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for health tracking accuracy, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: battery life and offline maps Tom’s Guide said the Coros Pace Pro offers better battery life and offline maps for less.
- Better: battery life and maps Android Central said the COROS Pace Pro offers longer battery life and offline maps.
- Cheaper: price and features TechRadar framed the 570 as pricier than the Coros Pace Pro despite rivals offering maps and battery advantages.
- Better: battery life Tom’s Guide said the 570’s battery life is shorter than the Garmin Forerunner 265.
- Cheaper: value for money Lifehacker argued many buyers could save money with the Forerunner 265.
- Better: battery life TechRadar said the 570 lasts less than the prior Forerunner 265 with comparable use.
- Better: battery life and offline maps Tom’s Guide said the Suunto Race S offers better battery life and offline maps for less.
- Cheaper: price and features TechRadar framed the 570 as pricier than the Suunto Race S, which offers competitive extras.
FAQ
Is the Garmin Forerunner 570 accurate for running?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its GPS and heart-rate accuracy, with several comparing it favorably to chest straps and premium Garmin models.
Does the Forerunner 570 have offline maps?
No. It supports breadcrumb-style routing and routes from Garmin Connect, but reviewers consistently criticized the lack of full offline maps at this price.
How good is the battery life?
It depends heavily on display settings. Some reviewers got around a week or more, while several reported only three to four days with always-on display and heavier training.
Is the display a major upgrade?
Yes. The brighter AMOLED screen was one of the most consistently praised upgrades, especially for sunlight visibility and day-to-day readability.
Does the Forerunner 570 support ECG?
No. Reviewers repeatedly called ECG a disappointing omission because the watch uses Garmin’s newer heart-rate sensor and sits at a premium price.
Is it worth the price?
Reviewer opinion was mixed to negative on value. They liked the watch itself, but many felt cheaper or slightly pricier alternatives offered better feature packages.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - The Quantified Scientist
- Review score
- 3.9
YouTube - German Accent Reviews
- Review score
- 3.6
YouTube - Triathlon Mike
- Review score
- 4.6
YouTube - The Run Testers
- Review score
- 3.9
Article Reviews
androidcentral.com
- Review score
- 3.4
livescience.com
- Review score
- 3.8
androidauthority.com
- Review score
- 4.0
lifehacker.com
- Review score
- 3.6
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...
Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money
Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments
Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...
Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy
Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: battery life, value for money
Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features