Amazfit Balance 2

Amazfit Balance 2 Review

Brand: Amazfit
Released: June 24, 2025
Updated: 1 month ago
4.0
Overall review score
247
Review evidence points
57
Scored features
15
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Amazfit Balance 2 for long battery life, strong fitness tracking, bright rugged hardware, and value. Skip it if you need full Apple/Wear OS-style apps, LTE, ECG, seamless payments, or top-tier sleep-stage accuracy.

Best for

Best for fitness-focused users who want long battery life, accurate everyday training data, golf or multisport coverage, and strong hardware value without paying premium sports-watch prices.

Not for

Not for users who need a full smartwatch ecosystem with LTE, deep third-party apps, music streaming, seamless payments, ECG, or the most dependable sleep-stage analysis.

Verdict

Across the reviews, the Amazfit Balance 2 stands out as a fitness-first smartwatch with unusually strong battery life, reliable GPS and heart-rate tracking in most tests, a bright AMOLED display, rugged materials, and broad workout coverage. The tradeoff is that its smartwatch side is less mature: reviewers repeatedly point to limited third-party apps, no LTE, weaker music streaming support, regional payment limits, and some uneven map or sleep-stage behavior. Its best case is as a value-packed sports and wellness watch that can handle golf, HYROX, daily health trends, and long stretches between charges, rather than as a full Apple Watch or Wear OS replacement.

Current model
Amazfit Balance 3
Amazfit Balance 3
4.2 June 2, 2026
View current model

Feature Scorecards

Summary

57 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    33 (58%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    13 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.7, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly confirming week-plus to multi-week endurance and calling it a major advantage over many smartwatch rivals.
  • 4.5
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 4.5, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value for money was a major positive theme, with most reviewers saying the Balance 2 delivers unusually strong features, battery life, and hardware for the price.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    workout tracking variety: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Workout tracking variety was a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the huge sport-mode selection, golf/HYROX support, and broad activity coverage.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 4.4, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS accuracy was one of the most frequently praised areas, though one scientific reviewer found it only adequate and less consistent than better devices.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Heart-rate accuracy was strong in most tests, especially running and general exercise, but it was less convincing in one weightlifting-focused scientific test.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    water resistance: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Water resistance was widely praised, especially the 10 ATM rating and suitability for swimming, snorkeling, diving, or water sports.

Cons

  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ECG functionality: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    ECG functionality was a clear missing feature in reviews that compared the Balance 2 with higher-end watches or listed absent health tools.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    LTE connectivity: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    LTE connectivity was a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of cellular independence from a phone.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    flashlight usefulness: 1.0, 1 review
    Flashlight usefulness scored poorly because reviewers treated the lack of a built-in flashlight as a missing convenience compared with premium sports watches.
  • 2.7
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    third-party app support: 2.7, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Third-party app support was the most repeated smartwatch limitation, especially around missing Spotify, limited app selection, and weaker ecosystem depth.
  • 2.6
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    contactless payments: 2.6, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Contactless payment support was a clear caveat, with reviewers noting Zepp Pay is less seamless than Apple Pay and that support varies by region or bank.
  • 2.9
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    watch face quality: 2.9, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Watch face quality was mixed: customization exists, but reviewers criticized the preloaded faces and broader watch-face selection.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in calorie tracking usefulness, Bluetooth connectivity, voice assistant quality, near average in GPS accuracy, style and design, below average in flashlight usefulness, ECG functionality, watch face quality.

Comparison summary

57 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    26 (46%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    24 (42%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    7 (12%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
flashlight usefulness 1.0 3.9 -2.9
calorie tracking usefulness 4.8 3.2 +1.6
ECG functionality 1.0 2.6 -1.6
Bluetooth connectivity 5.0 3.7 +1.3
voice assistant quality 4.1 3.0 +1.1
call handling 4.2 3.2 +1.0
value for money 4.5 3.8 +0.7
watch face quality 2.9 3.8 -0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better value for money

Choose Amazfit Active 2. It scores 5.0 vs 4.5 for value for money, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better mapping and navigation

Choose Garmin Forerunner 965. It scores 4.6 vs 3.8 for mapping and navigation, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better smartphone notifications

Choose Ticwatch Pro 5 Enduro. It scores 4.6 vs 4.0 for smartphone notifications, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better contactless payments

Choose Apple Watch Ultra 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for contactless payments, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Similar: dive-proof water resistance The reviewer says few watches, including the Apple Watch Ultra 3, offer similar dive-ready features.
  • Better: smartwatch features The reviewer says the Balance 2 is far behind the Apple Watch Ultra 3 as a smartwatch.
  • Similar: dive-proof water resistance The reviewer says few watches, including the Garmin Fenix 8, offer similar dive-ready features.

FAQ

How good is the battery life?

Battery life is the strongest point across the reviews. Reviewers repeatedly confirmed week-plus endurance and several saw the 21-day claim as realistic under lighter use.

Is the Amazfit Balance 2 accurate for workouts?

Most reviewers found GPS and heart-rate tracking reliable, especially for running and general exercise. One scientific review was more cautious, finding GPS only okay and weightlifting heart-rate tracking not good enough.

Is it a good smartwatch replacement for Apple Watch or Wear OS?

It handles basics like notifications, Bluetooth calls, apps, and some replies, but reviewers consistently said it does not match Apple Watch or Wear OS for app depth, LTE, streaming, or overall smart features.

How well does it work for golf?

Golf reviewers liked the course maps, yardages, hazard information, score tracking, and Zepp app reports. The main caveat was that golf mode can feel busy or clunky until you learn the menus.

Is sleep tracking reliable?

Several reviewers found core sleep trends useful or similar to other trackers, but the scientific review criticized REM sleep detection. It looks better for trends than precise sleep-stage analysis.

Can it play music or use payments without a phone?

It supports onboard MP3 storage and Zepp Pay in supported regions, but reviewers disliked the lack of streaming-service sync and noted payment support is not as seamless or universal as Apple Pay.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling