Best Entertainment

What matters
Best for
Brands
Release year
#241 I Will Find You
3.1

Best for a fast, pulpy Coben mystery with strong binge momentum. Skip it if plot logic, grounded characters, or family-friendly viewing matter most.

Pros: bingeability, suspense

Cons: plot twists, entertainment value

#242 Michael Jackson: The Verdict
3.1

Choose Michael Jackson: The Verdict if you want a courtroom-focused refresher on the 2005 trial and media storm. Skip it if you need major new reporting, a music biography, or...

Pros: media scrutiny portrayal, theme depth

Cons: interview and source material quality, plot originality

#243 Life, Larry, and the Pursuit of Unhappiness, Season 1
3.0

Choose it if you love Larry David’s Curb persona in historical dress-up. Skip it if recycled jokes, uneven sketch comedy, or slow, repetitive pacing wear you down.

Pros: supporting cast performance, audience appeal

Cons: humor, writing quality

#244 Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, Season 1
3.0

Best for colorful animation, short episodes, and more time with the young Hawkins crew. Skip it if canon gaps, repetitive monster fights, softened horror, or replacement voices will keep pulling...

Pros: entertainment value, animation quality

Cons: spin-off quality, acting quality

#245 Lucky Strike
3.0

Good if you want an old-fashioned WWII survival thriller with tense set pieces. Skip it if you need fresh plotting, a fully convincing lead, or strong historical realism.

Cons: lead performance, suspense

#246 Office Romance
3.0

Best for a glossy, adult rom-com carried by Jennifer Lopez, Brett Goldstein, and a terrific supporting cast. Skip it if predictable plotting, uneven chemistry, heavy profanity, or the graphic childbirth...

Pros: supporting cast performance, lead performance

Cons: chemistry between characters, humor

#247 Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, Season 2
3.0

Best for vivid animation, likable young-character chemistry, and a lighter Hawkins mystery. Skip it if you need the live-action show’s emotional weight, consequential stakes, or tight canon continuity.

Pros: animation quality, acting quality

Cons: story quality, character development

#248 Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu
2.9

Best for Grogu’s charm, energetic action, excellent puppetry, and a terrific score. Skip it if you expect an ambitious Star Wars event, meaningful character growth, or a story that truly...

Pros: action sequences, practical effects quality

Cons: entertainment value, story quality

#249 Kill Jackie
2.9

Best for Catherine Zeta-Jones, slick action, dark humor, and a confidently Welsh lead performance. Skip it if you need tight plotting, brisk pacing, or emotional depth; the eight-episode revenge story...

Pros: main cast performance, visual style

Cons: story quality, plot originality

#250 By Any Means
2.9

Best for Abdul-Mateen II, the prickly lead chemistry, and striking period craft. Skip it if major historical liberties, graphic torture, or an anticlimactic ending will outweigh the pulpy revenge-thriller appeal.

Pros: chemistry between characters, acting performance

Cons: entertainment value, historical accuracy

#251 The Season (2026), Season 1
2.9

Choose The Season if you want glossy Hong Kong high-society scenery, light summer intrigue, and some engaging cast dynamics. Skip it if stiff dialogue, familiar revenge plotting, thin character work,...

Pros: visual style, main cast performance

Cons: plot originality, story quality

#252 Elle, Season 1
2.9

Choose Elle Season 1 if you want a light, pink-tinted teen dramedy with Lexi Minetree’s warm lead turn. Skip it if a repetitive, canon-straining Legally Blonde prequel or overlong nostalgia...

Pros: main cast performance, supporting cast performance

Cons: entertainment value, franchise connection

#253 The Mortuary Assistant
2.8

Best for grisly practical mortuary effects, Willa Holland’s committed lead work, and game-faithful atmosphere. Skip it if you need clean exposition, sustained scares, or smooth pacing; those are the film’s...

Pros: lead performance, faithfulness to source material

Cons: genre satisfaction, scares

#254 Supergirl
2.8

Best for Milly Alcock’s wounded, spirited take on Kara and its imaginative alien settings. Skip it if you want a tightly plotted, uplifting superhero adventure or a compelling villain.

Pros: lead performance, supporting cast performance

Cons: entertainment value, villain quality

#255 Fall 2: Deadpoint
2.8

Best for big-screen vertigo, tense climbing set pieces, and committed leads. Skip it if repetitive sequel plotting, implausible decisions, weak character writing, or uneven effects quickly pull you out of...

Pros: suspense, cinematography

Cons: ending satisfaction, plot originality

#256 The Witcher, Season 4
2.7

Choose it if you want kinetic fights, standout villains, and Regis despite a rough adaptation. Skip it if weak writing, source changes, or the Rats storyline are deal-breakers.

Pros: action quality, villain quality

Cons: entertainment value, faithfulness to source material

#257 Little Brother
2.7

Best for Cena and André’s lively odd-couple chemistry and unapologetically crude physical comedy. Skip it if predictable plots, graphic sexual humor, or abrupt sentimental turns usually wear you down.

Pros: acting performance, chemistry between characters

Cons: humor, entertainment value

#258 Verity
2.6

Best for Hathaway, lush production design, campy crowd energy, and a few effective jolts. Skip it if you want tight pacing, convincing romance, or an ending that cleanly rewards the...

Pros: acting performance, production design

Cons: entertainment value, genre satisfaction

#259 Unabomber
2.6

Best for Jacob Tremblay, Russell Crowe, and the more gripping Harvard material. Skip it if you want a cohesive FBI procedural or careful historical certainty.

Pros: acting performance, lead performance

Cons: story quality, suspense

#260 Without Blood
2.6

Best for committed performances, a harrowing opening, and a handful of striking visual moments. Skip it if you need sustained tension, deep characterization, or a more specific and nuanced treatment...

Pros: acting performance, cinematography

Cons: directing quality, story quality

#261 Passenger
2.6

Best for polished night-road atmosphere, likable leads, and several clever scare set pieces. Skip it if you need original plotting, developed characters, coherent monster rules, or a satisfying finale.

Pros: visual style, directing quality

Cons: scares, story quality

#262 The Whisper Man
2.6

Best for a cast-led, atmospheric serial-killer thriller with standout Michael Keaton moments. Skip it if you need airtight logic, deep characterization, surprising twists, or family-friendly material.

Pros: acting performance, scares

Cons: entertainment value, character development

#263 The Get Out
2.6

Best for Russell Crowe’s playful, charismatic lead turn and a few lively ensemble moments. Skip it if you want a sharp, suspenseful crime comedy; the crowded plot, thin characters, and...

Pros: lead performance, acting performance

Cons: entertainment value, character development

#264 Matchbox The Movie
2.6

Best for big practical car chases, John Cena’s action presence, and a few ensemble laughs. Skip it if you want a fresh story, natural toy-brand integration, or tightly paced character...

Pros: action sequences, lead performance

Cons: entertainment value, faithfulness to source material

#265 Animals
2.5

Best for a casual streaming evening if familiar actors and tangled moral choices appeal. Skip it for family viewing or if you need a tightly resolved thriller with convincing characters.

Pros: supporting cast performance, casting quality

Cons: entertainment value, screenplay quality

#266 The Abandons
2.5

Best for Anderson and Headey’s fierce rivalry, strong production design, and quick seven-episode run. Skip it if you need deep characters, natural dialogue, steady pacing, or a resolved finale.

Pros: main cast performance, production design

Cons: character development, season pacing

#267 Moana
2.5

Best for Catherine Laga’aia, Rena Owen, the familiar songs, and vibrant Polynesian representation. Skip it if you expect a fresh adventure; flat CGI, sluggish pacing, and near-shot-for-shot storytelling make the...

Pros: soundtrack quality, chemistry between characters

Cons: originality, visual style

#268 Other Mommy
2.5

Best for Jessica Chastain’s unsettling dual role and fast-moving surreal horror. Skip it if you want carefully built suspense, convincing effects, or a satisfying family story.

Pros: lead performance, visual style

Cons: scares, story quality

#269 Scary Movie
2.5

Best for Anna Faris, Regina Hall, franchise nostalgia, and a few inspired visual gags. Skip it if you need consistent laughs, a coherent story, or sharper satire; most reviewers found...

Pros: ending satisfaction, acting performance

Cons: humor, plot clarity

#270 Summerwater, Season 1
2.4

Choose Summerwater if you want a relentlessly bleak, mood-heavy Scottish thriller with strong performances and scenic atmosphere. Skip it if you need propulsive plotting, clear supernatural answers, or characters you...

Pros: suspense

Cons: entertainment value, story quality

#271 Ricky Gervais Alley Cats
2.4

Choose it if you enjoy Ricky Gervais’s abrasive, profane banter and want a very short animated binge with occasional tenderness. Skip it if you need sharp plotting, consistent laughs, or...

Pros: main cast performance, episode length

Cons: humor, emotional impact

#272 Calabasas Confidential, Season 1
2.4

Choose Calabasas Confidential if you want a glossy, low-effort rich-kid reality binge with occasional drama. Skip it if you need authentic bonds, sharper stakes, or cast members who feel distinct...

Cons: audience appeal, story quality

#273 The Varnell Hill Show
2.4

Best for familiar sitcom performers and lively guest spots. Skip it if dated jokes, intrusive laugh cues, or a loose story will outweigh the nostalgia.

Pros: guest appearances, acting quality

Cons: humor, fourth-wall narration

#274 In the Hand of Dante
2.3

Choose it if you want a visually extravagant, aggressively strange literary crime epic and can tolerate confusion. Skip it if you need tight pacing, coherent timelines, convincing romance, or consistently...

Pros: lead performance, supporting cast performance

Cons: story quality, plot clarity

#275 The Fix
2.3

Choose it if you want brutal military action, conspiracy twists, and an unusual Iran-set heist. Skip it if you need a tight runtime, clean plotting, nuanced politics, or consistently convincing...

Pros: action sequences, suspense

Cons: runtime, story quality

#276 Wonka’s The Golden Ticket, Season 1
2.3

Best for the elaborate edible factory and cutthroat reality twists. Skip it if you want Wonka’s warmth, clear game rules, or a human narrator.

Pros: production design, visual style

Cons: entertainment value, faithfulness to source material

#277 The Runner
2.0

Skip if you want a convincing, suspenseful thriller; the thin logic and divisive ending dominate the experience. Choose it only for a short, frantic London chase or accidental-comedy appeal.

Pros: humor, production design

Cons: lead performance, entertainment value

#278 Tom and Jerry: Forbidden Compass
1.7

Choose it only for colorful animation and scattered classic slapstick; skip it if you want a focused Tom and Jerry adventure, coherent storytelling, or a calmer family watch. Most reactions...

Cons: faithfulness to source material, story quality