If you want better makeup quality
Choose Stop! That! Train!. It scores 5.0 vs 1.2 for makeup quality, with a 3.5 overall score.
Moana Movie Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for Catherine Laga’aia, Rena Owen, the familiar songs, and vibrant Polynesian representation. Skip it if you expect a fresh adventure; flat CGI, sluggish pacing, and near-shot-for-shot storytelling make the animated original the stronger choice.
Best for
Best for families or younger viewers who have not seen the animated film and want its songs and story performed by a strong Polynesian cast. It also suits fans especially interested in the costumes, cultural detail, and live performers.
Not for
Skip it if you want a bold reinterpretation, convincing live-action realism, or a stronger version of the familiar adventure. Existing fans may find the animated original more vibrant, funnier, and better paced.
Verdict
The live-action Moana survives on the strength of material that already worked: memorable songs, a clear coming-of-age adventure, and meaningful Polynesian representation. Catherine Laga’aia brings warmth, determination, and a strong voice, while Rena Owen gives the film its most affecting human moments. The craft is less consistent. Costumes, practical island details, tropical cinematography, and parts of the score impress, but the green-screen ocean, hybrid creatures, and Maui’s prosthetic look often feel artificial. Most critics also find the nearly beat-for-beat approach creatively unnecessary, with sluggish stretches and little reason to prefer it over the animated film. It remains watchable family entertainment, especially for newcomers, but its best qualities are inherited and its weakest choices come from trying to reproduce animation too literally.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
45 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.013 (29%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.45 (11%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (20%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.413 (29%)
-
Very negative below 1.55 (11%)
Pros
-
The Polynesian and Pacific Islander cast, dance, music, community rituals, and physical diversity are consistently celebrated. The live performers make Motunui’s culture feel more tangible and specific.
-
The returning songs are the remake’s most consistent strength, with How Far I’ll Go, We Know the Way, You’re Welcome, and Shiny still landing. The new end-credits song receives much weaker reactions.
-
The practical clothing is one of the remake’s clearest craft strengths, with rich texture, careful cultural detail, and convincing weathering. Liz McGregor’s work translates the animated designs with impressive precision.
-
The core tale of identity, leadership, restoration, and voyaging remains strong, clear, and emotionally accessible. The remake benefits greatly from inheriting one of Disney’s better modern stories.
-
The strongest images are crisp tropical vistas, sweeping island views, and bright ocean colors. Oscar Faura’s long shots give the production some genuine scale even when effects-heavy scenes feel enclosed.
-
Motunui, the boats, and the practical island spaces show strong craftsmanship and texture. The production is most convincing before the adventure moves into heavily digital settings.
Cons
-
The overwhelming complaint is that the remake adds almost nothing new. Its shot-for-shot instincts, recycled staging, and fear of meaningful change make it feel more like imitation than reinterpretation.
-
The central value problem is that a more vivid version is already widely available. Paying theater prices for a near-copy with flatter visuals is difficult to justify for viewers who know the original.
-
The tropical palette, costumes, and occasional stylized musical passages can be attractive. Much of the movie still looks flat, overprocessed, stagebound, or less vibrant than the animation it copies.
-
Maui’s wig, prosthetic bodysuit, and overly literal physical recreation are among the most repeated complaints. The look is frequently described as artificial, distracting, or costume-like.
-
Critical response is predominantly negative, centered on the remake’s lack of purpose and invention. A smaller group considers it a buoyant or at least competent entry among Disney’s live-action adaptations.
-
The mix of actors, green screens, digital water, and cartoon-like creatures rarely feels physically coherent. Many scenes look polished but not convincingly real.
Cast & Creators
-
TalaShe is one of the most consistently praised performers, giving Tala warmth, mischief, wisdom, and emotional gravity. Her scenes with Moana are frequently described as the film’s most touching.
-
MoanaShe brings a bright, earnest presence, strong vocals, and convincing determination to Moana. Some critics find her constrained by the close imitation of the original performance, but she is widely viewed as a promising lead.
-
TuiHe gives Chief Tui warmth, dignity, and a grounded parental presence. His work helps the family and village feel credible even when the surrounding effects do not.
-
CinematographerHis cinematography delivers crisp tropical color, lush scenery, and several beautiful island long shots. The location imagery provides welcome scale when the effects allow it.
-
SinaShe makes the most of a smaller role as Sina, adding warmth and family texture. Her contribution is often praised alongside John Tui’s.
-
Costume DesignerHer costumes are richly detailed, culturally textured, and carefully matched to the animated designs. The work is repeatedly cited as one of the production’s strongest tangible elements.
View all 45 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in age appropriateness, romance quality, ending satisfaction, near average in soundtrack quality, CGI quality, below average in visual style, originality, makeup quality.
Comparison summary
45 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher13 (29%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts6 (13%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower26 (58%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| visual style | 1.8 | 4.1 | -2.4 |
| originality | 1.1 | 3.4 | -2.3 |
| makeup quality | 1.2 | 3.5 | -2.3 |
| critic appeal | 1.5 | 3.7 | -2.2 |
| value for money | 1.2 | 3.3 | -2.1 |
| directing quality | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| realism | 1.3 | 3.4 | -2.1 |
| plot originality | 1.0 | 3.1 | -2.1 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better visual style
Choose Project Hail Mary. It scores 4.7 vs 1.8 for visual style, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better originality
Choose The Furious. It scores 4.8 vs 1.1 for originality, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better directing quality
Choose Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for directing quality, with a 3.7 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Beauty and the Beast
- Worse: live-action remake execution This Moana is presented as livelier and more successful than Beauty and the Beast.
How to Train Your Dragon
- Worse: runtime expansion Moana adds far less unnecessary runtime than How to Train Your Dragon.
Psycho
- Similar: shot-for-shot faithfulness Its extreme fidelity is compared to the famously literal Psycho remake.
FAQ
Is the live-action Moana worth seeing if I already love the animated film?
It offers strong songs, cultural representation, and several appealing performances, but it follows the original extremely closely. Viewers who want a fresh interpretation are likely to prefer rewatching the animated version.
Are the songs still good?
Yes. The returning soundtrack is the most consistently praised part, especially How Far I’ll Go, We Know the Way, You’re Welcome, and Shiny, though the new end-credits song is less memorable.
How are Catherine Laga’aia and Dwayne Johnson?
Laga’aia is widely praised for her warmth, determination, presence, and singing. Johnson is more divisive, with a few lively musical moments but frequent criticism that his Maui feels restrained and less charming than the animated performance.
Does the CGI look convincing?
Only sometimes. Water effects and a few stylized sequences work, but many critics describe the green-screen environments and hybrid creatures as flat, artificial, or lacking physical weight.
Is it a good family movie?
The story remains accessible, musical, and centered on courage, family, identity, and community. Families new to Moana may enjoy it, while those familiar with the original may find this version less colorful and less magical.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Breakfast All Day movie reviews
- Review score
- 3.8
Article Reviews
the-independent.com
- Review score
- 2.2
chicagotribune.com
- Review score
- 3.5
theglobeandmail.com
Top Movies to Consider
Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...
Pros: plot clarity, realism
Cons: plot originality, runtime
Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...
Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction
Cons: runtime, pacing
Best for joyful music, rare footage, candid interviews, and a layered Maurice White portrait. Skip it if you want a tightly focused, unconventional reappraisal that lingers on performances instead of...
Pros: ending satisfaction, drama quality
Cons: runtime, originality
Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...
Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material
Cons: none