If you want better supporting cast performance
Choose The Testaments, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 3.0 for supporting cast performance, with a 3.8 overall score.
Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, Season 1 Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for colorful animation, short episodes, and more time with the young Hawkins crew. Skip it if canon gaps, repetitive monster fights, softened horror, or replacement voices will keep pulling you out.
Best for
Best for younger viewers, franchise completionists, and fans who mainly want more time with the original kids in a lighter, visually vivid monster adventure.
Not for
Not for viewers who need tight canon, serious horror, major consequences, or a fresh expansion of the universe rather than another story centered on the same characters.
Verdict
Tales From '85 works best as a bright, low-stakes return to the friendship-driven early years of Stranger Things. Its snowy Hawkins setting, vivid production design, energetic creature action, strong cliffhangers, and familiar group chemistry give fans plenty to enjoy, while younger viewers get the franchise’s most approachable entry. The tradeoff is that the interquel format sharply limits suspense and character growth. Nikki’s importance, the new threats, and repeated arcs create persistent continuity questions, and many critics find the ten-episode story repetitive, sanitized, or unnecessary. The voice cast and human character designs are especially divisive. Taken as optional nostalgic side content, it can be warm and entertaining; treated as essential canon, its weaknesses become much harder to ignore.
Seasons
Stranger Things: Tales From ’85- Season 1This product
- Season 2
Feature Scorecards
Summary
56 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.015 (27%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (30%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.413 (23%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.411 (20%)
Pros highlights
-
The season is entertaining when treated as a light, nostalgic side adventure, and several viewers call it fun or even great. Others find it dull, irritating, or unnecessary, making overall enjoyment strongly dependent on tolerance for repetition and canon issues.
-
Animation is the show’s most polarizing feature. Environments, lighting, monsters, and action earn frequent praise, while the stiff, doll-like human designs and borrowed Spider-Verse-style movement draw equally strong criticism.
-
The visual style is bold, colorful, and often cinematic, with luminous lighting and strong environmental design. The human faces are more divisive, ranging from gorgeous and dreamy to cheap, doll-like, or lifeless.
-
The TV-PG approach works well for older children and families, especially viewers not ready for the live-action series. Sensitive kids may still find the monsters, kidnappings, and jump scares intense.
-
The strongest appeal is the return to kids on bikes, small-town mysteries, early friendships, and 1980s atmosphere. Even skeptical viewers often agree that it reconnects with the parts of Stranger Things they once loved.
-
Familiar friendships and quieter interpersonal scenes provide the strongest emotion. The returning characters can feel comforting and heartfelt, though rushed or repetitive arcs weaken some dramatic moments.
Cons highlights
-
As a spin-off, the season is deeply divisive. Supporters enjoy a colorful return to the franchise’s early charm, while detractors see a safe, repetitive, and commercially driven extension that never justifies its existence.
-
Voice acting splits opinion almost evenly. Braxton Quinney, Jolie Hoang-Rappaport, and several other performers receive strong praise, but harsher takes describe the cast as uneven imitations lacking the original actors’ nuance.
-
Continuity is the most repeated complaint. Nikki’s importance, the new monsters, altered character arcs, and the lack of later references make the story difficult for many viewers to accept as canon.
-
The central mystery earns praise from a few viewers for its twists and monster-driven momentum, but the broader reaction is that it feels thin, repetitive, and less consequential than the live-action series.
-
Nikki is the biggest supporting-cast divider: some call her funny, charming, and an excellent addition, while others feel she dominates the story or never fits the established group. Older characters are also frequently missed or sidelined.
-
Suspense is highly inconsistent. Several reviews praise creepy set pieces and a strong finale, but many say plot armor, toned-down monsters, and foreknown outcomes make most danger feel muted.
Cast & Creators
-
Nikki BaxterA’zion’s scratchy, distinctive delivery helps make Nikki the season’s most praised new character. Even mixed critics often describe her as charming, engaging, or the ensemble’s bright spot.
-
DustinQuinney’s Dustin is praised by several critics as uncannily accurate and instantly engaging, though one strongly negative take finds the performance awkward and mismatched.
-
MaxHoang-Rappaport captures Max’s sarcasm and attitude with ease, earning repeated praise as one of the strongest replacement performers.
-
CreatorRobles is widely credited with understanding the early-series tone, bringing playful energy, and richly rebuilding Hawkins. One harsh critic instead includes him in the blame for the misguided serialized structure.
-
Production DesignerPlouffe’s production design is singled out for its gorgeous neon palette, contrasting colors, and richly realized 1980s Hawkins.
-
Nancy WheelerAntonelli’s Nancy Wheeler performance anchors what one critic calls the season’s best episode.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in CGI quality, family friendliness, age appropriateness, near average in season pacing, violence level, below average in audience appeal, continuity, suspense.
Comparison summary
56 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher18 (32%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts11 (20%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower27 (48%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| audience appeal | 1.9 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| CGI quality | 5.0 | 2.8 | +2.2 |
| continuity | 1.7 | 3.4 | -1.7 |
| family friendliness | 4.4 | 2.3 | +2.0 |
| suspense | 2.6 | 4.1 | -1.6 |
| plot originality | 1.7 | 3.4 | -1.7 |
| realism | 1.5 | 3.4 | -1.9 |
| supporting cast performance | 3.0 | 4.3 | -1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better acting quality
Choose Dark Winds, Season 4. It scores 4.9 vs 3.1 for acting quality, with a 4.4 overall score.
If you want better continuity
Choose Spartacus: House of Ashur. It scores 5.0 vs 1.7 for continuity, with a 3.6 overall score.
If you want better episode structure
Choose Run Away, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 2.1 for episode structure, with a 3.8 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
The Real Ghostbusters
- Compared: polish versus charm It is more polished than the older cartoon but also judged blander.
- Compared: animation style The newer 3D animation is technically advanced but considered less charming than its retro inspiration.
Camp Cretaceous
- Better: child-friendly suspense Camp Cretaceous is judged more successful at making children's peril feel serious.
Jurassic World: Chaos Theory
- Better: danger and suspense Tales From '85 feels less dangerous because its story is more constrained by canon.
FAQ
Does it feel like early Stranger Things?
Often, yes. The kids-on-bikes focus, small-town mystery, friendships, and 1980s atmosphere repeatedly remind viewers of the first two seasons.
Is it suitable for children?
It is the franchise’s most kid-friendly entry, with cleaner language and less blood. Monsters, kidnappings, jump scares, and peril may still be intense for sensitive children.
Is the animation good?
The environments, lighting, colors, monsters, and action are widely praised. The human faces and movement are much more divisive, with some viewers finding them beautiful and others stiff or doll-like.
Do the new voice actors work?
Opinions are split. Braxton Quinney and Jolie Hoang-Rappaport receive frequent praise, but several critics feel the cast sounds like uneven imitations of the original performers.
Does the story fit established canon?
That is the biggest point of criticism. Nikki, the new monsters, repeated character arcs, and the lack of later references make the timeline difficult for many viewers to accept.
Is the season bingeable?
Strong cliffhangers and short episodes make it easy to continue, but repeated chase-and-rescue patterns can make the middle stretch feel tiring.
Does the ending leave room for another season?
Yes. The finale leaves threads open, and some viewers found that promising, while others felt the canon problems gave them little reason to continue.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
podcast.ausha.co
The series takes place between the events of the second and third seasons of Stranger Things, and depicts the children – Eleven, Mike...
- Review score
- 2.5
pluggedin.com
While Netflix says that the animated ‘Stranger Things: Tales From ’85’ is a kinder, gentler sort of ‘Stranger Things’ show, that hardly makes...
- Review score
- 3.8
comicsbeat.com
The animated interquel is well-made, but how is its target audience not supposed to feel lost without watching the original series?
- Review score
- 3.7
nuhahassan.medium.com
Stranger Things has always been between a high and a low for me. The second season was the biggest high for me; the series finale was…
- Review score
- 4.0
thereviewgeek.com
Season 1 Episode Guide Episode 1 -| Review Score – 2.5/5 Episode 2 -| Review Score – 2/5 Episode 3 -| Review Score – 2.5/5 Episode 4 -|...
- Review score
- 1.7
Top TV Shows to Consider
Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.
Pros: humor, writing quality
Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...
Pros: franchise connection, character development
Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.
Pros: realism, emotional impact
Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...
Pros: main cast performance, character development
Cons: pilot episode quality