Scary Movie

Scary Movie Review

Brand: Paramount
Released: June 5, 2026
Updated: 1 month ago
2.5
Overall review score
127
Review evidence points
31
Scored features
53
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for Anna Faris, Regina Hall, franchise nostalgia, and a few inspired visual gags. Skip it if you need consistent laughs, a coherent story, or sharper satire; most reviewers found the jokes stale, uneven, and overly dependent on recognition.

Best for

Best for established fans of the early Wayans entries who enjoy crude, rapid-fire parody and want a nostalgic cast reunion.

Not for

Skip it if you want a coherent story, consistently clever satire, restrained sexual humor, or sensitive handling of gender and generational politics.

Verdict

Scary Movie works best as a nostalgic cast reunion rather than a sharp modern parody. Anna Faris, Regina Hall, Olivia Rose Keegan, and several cameos repeatedly earn praise, and reviewers point to the opening, background sight gags, fourth-wall jokes, and final act as the clearest highlights. The problem is consistency. Across the reviews, the rapid-fire approach produces far more misses than hits, while the Scream-derived story dissolves into disconnected sketches. Many critics also find the social commentary dated, toothless, or mean-spirited, especially around gender and younger audiences. Fans of the first two films may still enjoy the familiar rhythms and committed performers, but anyone expecting the freshness or precision of a strong spoof is likely to find the revival overstuffed, repetitive, and only intermittently funny.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

31 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    6 (19%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    7 (23%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    2 (6%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (29%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (23%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    ending satisfaction: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The final stretch is consistently stronger than the middle, with darker swings, legacy-cast payoffs, and a more focused climax that finally delivers some of the movie’s biggest laughs.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    chemistry between characters: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cindy and Brenda’s rapport remains one of the movie’s strongest pleasures, and the returning ensemble often clicks when allowed to share scenes. The movie does not give that chemistry enough room.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The overall experience depends strongly on tolerance for crude, absurd, deliberately lowbrow comedy. Fans can have a relaxed, enjoyable time, while others may find the long stretches between strong jokes exhausting.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    production design: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The recreated horror locations are impressively recognizable and often make the parodies funnier before a joke is even delivered.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    lead performance: 5.0, 1 review
    Anna Faris and Regina Hall remain the movie’s strongest leads, repeatedly creating laughs through timing, expression, and total commitment.
  • 3.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    acting performance: 3.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The committed cast is the clearest strength, especially the returning leads and Olivia Rose Keegan. Some performers are underused or trapped in tired routines, but they frequently make thin material more watchable.

Cons

  • 1.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 1.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The opening and final act move best, while the middle loses momentum through long, repetitive sketches and abrupt detours. Even the short runtime can feel laborious when jokes fail.
  • 1.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    story quality: 1.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The Scream-inspired family storyline offers a workable spine, but it quickly dissolves into a nonsensical chain of sketches with little investment, continuity, or character consequence.
  • 1.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    cultural representation: 1.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The handling of gender, pronouns, queer identities, and Gen-Z politics is the movie’s most contentious weakness. Several jokes feel dated or cruel, though a minority view the everyone-is-a-target approach as self-aware and inclusive.
  • 1.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 1.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The reboot-sequel premise and occasional meta joke show promise, but much of the movie feels like a recolored collection of old tricks and recognizable scenes without a fresh comic angle.
  • 1.8
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    plot clarity: 1.8, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The basic Ghostface setup is easy to grasp, but the movie repeatedly abandons it for disconnected sketches, crowded cameos, and characters who vanish for long stretches.
  • 2.3
    51 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 2.3, 51 reviews, moderate consensus
    The comedy is wildly inconsistent. Inspired sight gags, fourth-wall jokes, and committed delivery earn real laughs, but the rapid-fire barrage contains far more stale, obvious, stretched, or recycled punchlines.

Cast & Creators

  • Sara
    4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Olivia Rose Keegan: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Olivia Rose Keegan is a standout new addition, capturing Cindy’s breathy comic rhythm while giving Sara her own energetic presence.
  • Actor
    5.0
    1 review
    Teyana Taylor: 5.0, 1 review
    Teyana Taylor’s self-mocking cold-open performance is widely treated as an early high point, combining physical confidence, sharp timing, and star-persona jokes.
  • Cindy
    4.5
    1 review
    Anna Faris: 4.5, 1 review
    Anna Faris remains one of the franchise’s most reliable comic weapons, selling weak material through deadpan sincerity, physical commitment, and precise line delivery.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Heidi Gardner: 4.5, 1 review
    Heidi Gardner delivers a sharp, specific send-up of the detective archetype and makes strong use of her limited screen time.
  • Brenda
    4.5
    1 review
    Regina Hall: 4.5, 1 review
    Regina Hall brings expressive, fearless comic timing to Brenda and repeatedly lifts scenes that would otherwise fall flat.
  • Jack
    4.0
    1 review
    Cameron Scott Roberts: 4.0, 1 review
    Cameron Scott Roberts gives Jack a playful, committed parody performance and nails the mannerisms of the character type he is spoofing.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in ending satisfaction, action sequences, character development, near average in production design, cinematography, below average in genre satisfaction, theme depth, message quality.

Comparison summary

31 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    9 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    4 (13%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    18 (58%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
genre satisfaction 1.0 4.0 -3.0
theme depth 1.0 3.7 -2.7
message quality 1.0 3.7 -2.7
cultural representation 1.6 3.9 -2.3
tonal consistency 1.0 3.4 -2.4
directing quality 1.8 4.0 -2.2
value for money 1.3 3.3 -2.0
story quality 1.4 3.3 -1.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better message quality

Choose Honeyjoon. It scores 4.7 vs 1.0 for message quality, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better theme depth

Choose Maddie’s Secret. It scores 4.8 vs 1.0 for theme depth, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better value for money

Choose Romería. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for value for money, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Scary Movie 5

  • Worse: overall quality Even a mixed reviewer considers it preferable to the fifth film.
  • Worse: overall quality It is still judged better than the franchise’s widely disliked fifth installment.

Naked Gun reboot

  • Better: humor It is substantially less funny than the recent spoof reboot.

Scary Movie 2

  • Better: humor The reviewer enjoyed it but laughed less than during the early sequel.

FAQ

Is Scary Movie (2026) actually funny?

It is very inconsistent. A few visual gags, cameos, fourth-wall jokes, and the final act earn strong laughs, but most critics found the overall hit rate low.

What is the best part of the movie?

The returning cast is the most reliable strength, especially Anna Faris and Regina Hall, while Olivia Rose Keegan and Teyana Taylor also receive notable praise.

Do I need to know recent horror movies?

Familiarity with Scream, The Substance, Get Out, Sinners, Longlegs, Terrifier, and other recent titles helps because many jokes depend on recognizing the reference.

Is it family-friendly?

No. The reviews describe explicit sexual jokes, nudity, gross-out material, strong language, violence, and identity-based humor that may be uncomfortable or offensive.

Who is most likely to enjoy it?

Longtime fans of the first two films and viewers who enjoy crude, absurd, early-2000s-style Wayans comedy have the best chance of enjoying the reunion.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Movies to Consider

#1 Disneyland Handcrafted
4.8

Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...

Pros: plot clarity, realism

Cons: plot originality, runtime

#2 Remake
4.8

Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...

Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction

Cons: runtime, pacing

#4 Mary Oliver: Saved by the Beauty of the World
4.7

Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...

Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material

Cons: none