#1
The quick, acerbic dialogue remains a standout, with razor-sharp exchanges and dry wit surviving the season’s darker turn. Reviewers especially praised how the banter keeps tension from becoming monotonous.
Pros: main cast performance, humor
Cons: plot originality
#2
The lines favor clipped, deadpan reactions and sharply delivered character humor over broad gag sequences.
Pros: humor, genre satisfaction
Cons: ending satisfaction, season pacing
#3
The dialogue was praised as realistic and punchy, helping the show move between family conflict, humor, and class commentary.
Pros: audience appeal, character development
Cons: season pacing, season length
#4
The team-clique banter lands well when the show keeps conversations compact, playful, and rooted in character.
Pros: humor, sports storyline quality
Cons: story quality, character development
#5
Dialogue gets a modestly positive response when it relies on charged looks and well-crafted exchanges. Some lighter lines and exposition were less convincing.
Pros: acting quality, visual style
Cons: story quality, season length
#6
Dialogue has flashes of sharp banter and above-average thriller exposition. It is not universally praised, though, because a few moments come off forced or overly TV-ish.
Pros: main cast performance, supporting cast performance
Cons: plot clarity, season pacing
#7
The dialogue is praised when it sounds natural and distinctly Australian, though one review finds some police characters reduced to exposition-heavy functions.
Pros: story quality, genre satisfaction
Cons: realism, season pacing
#8
Dialogue is more mixed than the broader writing. One review notes that the show still leans on cryptic half-truths, which suits the mystery but can make motivations demanding to follow.
Pros: main cast performance, episode structure
Cons: season pacing, character development
#9
One negative review found some dialogue interchangeable, especially when the scientist characters gather to explain ideas.
Pros: story quality, theme depth
Cons: plot clarity, season pacing
#10
Routine exposition, stiff spy talk and winking one-liners rarely rise above functional, and some exchanges are criticized as especially artificial.
Pros: action sequences, lead performance
Cons: entertainment value, faithfulness to source material
#11
The weakest dialogue is described as dull or clunky, especially for supporting characters who already have limited material.
Pros: cast chemistry, supporting cast performance
Cons: humor, story quality