Choose Season 4 if you want Richmond’s warmth, strong returning chemistry, and a promising women’s-team reset led by standout Alice. Skip it if overlong episodes, recycled romance, and underdeveloped new players were already your biggest frustrations.
Best for
Best for viewers who still enjoy Richmond’s warmth and ensemble chemistry and want a women’s-football reset with new characters, social stakes, and a strong Alice Chilton arc.
Not for
Less suited to viewers already frustrated by long runtimes, sentimental detours, recycled Roy-Keeley drama, or the show spending too little time developing its new players.
Verdict
Season 4 finds its best reason to exist in the Lady Greyhounds. The women’s-team reset opens useful stories about funding, facilities, pay, media attention, and what belief can accomplish when structural obstacles remain. Tanya Reynolds’ Alice Chilton is the clearest new standout, while the returning cast still has easy chemistry and warmth. The tradeoff is focus: long episodes, recycled Roy-Keeley material, and other legacy subplots repeatedly crowd out the new players, leaving much of the squad thinner than the premise deserves. Comedy is similarly uneven, ranging from laugh-out-loud Lasso banter to broad or strained gags. At its best, the season feels purposeful and comforting again; at its weakest, it looks like a revival still trying to justify why it came back.
Comedy is one of the most divisive areas: some episodes deliver laugh-out-loud banter and classic Lasso lines, while others feel short on gags or overly broad.
The Lady Greyhounds are the season’s strongest reason to exist. Their resource gaps, team-building, and fight for respect create meaningful stakes, even when legacy subplots steal time.
The strongest episodes deepen the old BELIEVE philosophy by asking what optimism can and cannot solve when players face structural and financial pressures.
The new ensemble is a major bright spot, led by especially strong praise for Tanya Reynolds and solid notices for Faye Marsay, Abbie Hern, and Jude Mack.
Season 4 can still land heartfelt moments, from Ted confronting shame and purpose to quieter scenes of the women balancing football with everyday pressures.
Season 4 is broadly mixed: its best episodes feel warm and purposeful again, while weaker stretches are criticized as unnecessary, unfocused, or too dependent on old formulas.
character development: 3.4, 21 reviews, low consensus
Alice receives the clearest growth arc, gradually softening her pressure-first coaching and connecting with the team, while several players still need more individual depth.
The biggest structural weakness is crowded focus: legacy romances and side stories often squeeze out the Lady Greyhounds, leaving several new players underexplored.
The revival works best when it uses familiar characters to support the Lady Greyhounds rather than replay old beats; nostalgia is comforting but can become baggage.
modern political framing: 2.6, 10 reviews, low consensus
The women’s-sports framing has real substance when tied to concrete inequities, but some sources find the feminism too blunt, preachy, or undercut by thin characterization.
The Lady Greyhounds provide genuine freshness, but the season repeatedly falls back on familiar romance, nostalgia, and story patterns from earlier years.
Reynolds is the clearest breakout of the new ensemble, giving Alice Chilton a mix of severity, vulnerability, dry humor, and emotional weight that repeatedly stands out.
Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in dialogue quality, supporting cast performance, cast chemistry, near average in humor, sports storyline quality, below average in bingeability, episode structure, villain quality.
Comparison summary
43 compared features
Above average0.4+ pts higher
8(19%)
Same as averagewithin 0.3 pts
17(40%)
Below average0.4+ pts lower
18(42%)
Largest category differences
Attribute
This product
Category average
Difference
bingeability
2.0
4.4
-2.4
episode structure
1.5
3.7
-2.2
villain quality
2.0
3.9
-1.9
suspense
2.6
4.1
-1.5
ensemble balance
2.0
3.2
-1.2
casting fairness
2.0
3.5
-1.5
realism
2.0
3.3
-1.3
pilot episode quality
2.6
3.8
-1.3
Consider This Instead
If you want better bingeability
Choose Reacher, Season 4. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for bingeability, with a 3.8 overall score.
At its best, yes: several sources describe later episodes as recapturing the warmth, humor, and character focus of earlier seasons. Others still find the revival uneven and overly dependent on familiar habits.
Does the women’s team make the revival feel fresh?
The Lady Greyhounds are the clearest source of fresh material, especially stories about pay, facilities, childcare, media attention, and unequal support. The recurring complaint is that the show does not spend enough time developing the players individually.
Who is the standout new character?
Alice Chilton is the most consistently praised newcomer. Tanya Reynolds is repeatedly singled out for bringing dry humor, vulnerability, intensity, and emotional weight to the role.
Is Season 4 still funny?
Comedy is mixed. Some episodes and Ted-style banter are described as laugh-out-loud funny, while other sources say the gags feel broad, strained, or too sparse.
Are the episodes still long?
Yes. Multiple sources flag roughly mid-40-minute runtimes as a continuing weakness, although some later episodes are praised for moving more quickly and engagingly.
Does Season 4 focus more on Ted or the Lady Greyhounds?
The season tries to broaden the story around the women’s team, but legacy characters and relationships still take substantial space. That balance is one of the most disputed parts of the revival.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.
Choose Widow’s Bay for its dark laughs, richly haunted island and memorable ensemble. Skip it if you need straightforward scares, rapid answers to every mystery or a completely resolved finale.
Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...
Best for sharply acted, compassionate, high-pressure hospital drama. Skip it if graphic procedures unsettle you or you need a neatly resolved season finale.