Weapons

Weapons Feature Scores

Explore all 40 feature scores for Weapons, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

40 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    9 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (60%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (8%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (10%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.5
    54 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.5, 54 reviews, strong consensus
    The ensemble earns broad praise for making frightened, compromised characters feel vivid, with a few performances standing out even in brief chapters.
  • 4.2
    38 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.2, 38 reviews, strong consensus
    The macabre comedy frequently releases tension without erasing the dread, though its broad final turn will not suit everyone.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    directing quality: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Cregger’s control of viewpoint, staging, and abrupt tonal turns impresses many, even when the plotting divides them.
  • 4.3
    14 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.3, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Horror fans praise its mix of dread, gore, and absurd humor, while a few want steadier scares or deeper answers.
  • 4.0
    28 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.0, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Many find the film a lively, unpredictable theater experience, with its black humor and shocks carrying them through the slower stretches.
  • 4.1
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    cinematography: 4.1, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Tracking shots, deep shadows, and ominous framing make the familiar neighborhood feel threatening.
  • 4.1
    14 reviews strong consensus
    suspense: 4.1, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Suspense grows through withheld information, shifting viewpoints, and the threat of something just outside the frame.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    score quality: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The score underlines dread with abrasive textures, while quieter stretches leave room for the images to work.
  • 4.2
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    screenplay quality: 4.2, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The screenplay’s chapter design and measured reveals are widely admired; a few find the construction cleverer than its answers.
  • 3.9
    39 reviews strong consensus
    scares: 3.9, 39 reviews, strong consensus
    The film alternates jump scares, creeping dread, and startling violence. Some find the mystery more gripping than frightening throughout.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting players add offbeat energy and pathos to the expanding town mystery.
  • 4.0
    17 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 4.0, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    The premise and unpredictable route through it feel unusually fresh, even to viewers who recognize some familiar genre pieces.
  • 4.0
    16 reviews strong consensus
    story quality: 4.0, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The missing children premise and intersecting points of view keep the mystery absorbing. A few find the larger story thinner than its hook.
  • 4.0
    16 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.0, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The running children and other stark images linger, while the visual language shifts with each viewpoint.
  • 3.8
    27 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.8, 27 reviews, low consensus
    The wild, darkly comic climax is a major payoff for many. Others find its resolution unearned or less emotionally satisfying than the setup.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    editing quality: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The editing makes overlapping chapters legible and lets individual scenes simmer before they collide.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    tonal consistency: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The film pivots between grief, dread, and absurd comedy with confidence for many, though the shift can feel jarring.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    plot originality: 4.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The chapter structure and unusual turns feel fresh to many viewers, though some see familiar horror machinery beneath the puzzle.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    audience appeal: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Crowd reactions and shared surprise are part of the appeal, especially when the finale turns theatrical and funny.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    sound design: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Layered sound effects and quiet spaces sharpen the tension before violent or comic releases.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    chemistry between characters: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The volatile connections among the townspeople help the overlapping stories feel more alive.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    costume design: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Costume choices add to the film’s uncanny, exaggerated character design.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    drama quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The child disappearances and townwide suspicion give the horror a credible dramatic pull.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    realism: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Grounded reactions and imperfect people help the supernatural events feel closer to everyday life.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    4K video quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The 4K UHD image draws praise for deep blacks, clear detail, and effective HDR in the film’s dark interiors.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Atmos audio quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The Dolby Atmos mix uses enveloping effects and forceful bass to make the film’s uneasy spaces feel active.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    lead performance: 5.0, 1 review
    The central performers help anchor the shifting viewpoints and keep the disappearance personal.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    makeup quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The makeup adds an eerie edge to the film’s most memorable presence.
  • 3.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The flawed teacher, grieving father, and peripheral townspeople give the mystery human texture. Some think the chapter format leaves several roles thin.
  • 3.5
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    theme depth: 3.5, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Images of missing children invite readings about grief, scapegoating, and violence. Some find those ideas suggestive rather than fully developed.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    soundtrack quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A pointed needle drop gives the opening disappearance an eerie, strangely dreamy quality.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    world-building: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The ordinary suburban setting becomes unsettling as neighbors turn suspicious and familiar streets feel unsafe.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    action sequences: 4.0, 1 review
    A few set pieces draw praise for their sharp staging and sudden escalation.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot clarity: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The delayed answers reward some viewers, while others question the logic or clarity of the eventual explanation.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    dialogue quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The film’s dialogue gets a pointed complaint for slowing the first half with dull exchanges.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    marketing accuracy: 2.0, 1 review
    The secretive campaign raised expectations for a colder nightmare than one critic felt the finished film delivered.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    rewatch value: 2.0, 1 review
    The film’s planted clues and shifting viewpoints invite another viewing, though one critic doubts the surprise will hold up.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    runtime: 3.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The long runtime feels justified to some by the layered mystery; others think repeated chapters could be trimmed.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The patient buildup gives the mystery room to breathe, but repeated perspectives and slower chapters test some viewers’ patience.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The loss and suspicion land hard for some viewers, but others feel the film’s emotional depth fades behind its puzzle and mayhem.

Cast & Creators

  • Justine Gandy
    4.6
    25 reviews strong consensus
    Julia Garner: 4.6, 25 reviews, strong consensus
    Her nervous, resilient teacher anchors the early mystery and earns praise for mixing fragility with determination.
  • Alex Lilly
    4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Cary Christopher: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The young actor’s quiet distress and eventual resolve stand out amid the adult ensemble.
  • Archer Graff
    4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Josh Brolin: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    His grieving father brings desperation and vulnerability to the search, giving the puzzle an emotional center.
  • Gladys
    4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Amy Madigan: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Her late-arriving performance is singled out for uncanny commitment, menace, and gleeful oddity.
  • Director
    4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Zach Cregger: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    His command of the shifting viewpoints and escalating dread earns praise, with particular attention to his staging and tonal control.
  • Andrew Marcus
    4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Benedict Wong: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    His principal moves between warmth and unease, with several viewers highlighting his unsettling turns.
  • Paul Morgan
    4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Alden Ehrenreich: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    His troubled cop adds volatility and dark humor to the story’s shifting perspectives.
  • James
    4.1
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Austin Abrams: 4.1, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    His disheveled drifter brings comic energy without losing the character’s desperation.
  • Composer
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Hays Holladay: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    His contribution to the score adds unnerving texture to quiet and violent passages.
  • Cinematographer
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Larkin Seiple: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    His camera work turns ordinary rooms and streets into expressive, threatening spaces.
  • Composer
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ryan Holladay: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    His uneasy, abrasive score helps sustain the film’s dread.
  • Casting Director
    4.0
    1 review
    Allison Jones: 4.0, 1 review
    Her casting of the young actor at the center of the mystery draws explicit praise.
  • Musician
    4.0
    1 review
    George Harrison: 4.0, 1 review
    His song gives the opening disappearance a dreamy, unsettling counterpoint.
  • Editor
    4.0
    1 review
    Joe Murphy: 4.0, 1 review
    His editing lets the viewpoints overlap without losing the story’s tension.
  • Actor
    4.0
    1 review
    June Diane Raphael: 4.0, 1 review
    Her brief turn contributes to the ensemble’s comic flashes.
  • Actor
    4.0
    1 review
    Justin Long: 4.0, 1 review
    His brief appearance provides a comic accent to the ensemble.
  • Actor
    4.0
    1 review
    Whitmer Thomas: 4.0, 1 review
    His short appearance leaves a surprisingly melancholy impression.