If you want better stress tracking
Choose Garmin Venu 3. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for stress tracking, with a 4.1 overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Galaxy Watch Ultra if you want a rugged Samsung-focused Wear OS watch with strong GPS, a bright display, and multi-day battery. Skip it if you need lower cost, smaller sizing, dive-grade water sports, or elite all-sport accuracy.
Best for
Best for Samsung or Android users who want a premium rugged Wear OS watch with a bright display, reliable GPS, useful smart features, and battery life that usually stretches beyond a day.
Not for
Not for shoppers who want a small or inexpensive watch, iPhone compatibility, true dive-watch water sports, Garmin-level endurance battery, or consistently elite health and sleep accuracy.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently frame the Galaxy Watch Ultra as Samsung’s most capable Wear OS watch: rugged, bright, smooth, and far better for battery life and GPS than prior Galaxy watches. The strongest evidence centers on outdoor visibility, durable materials, responsive software, useful quick controls, and mostly accurate GPS, with several reviewers calling it a serious sports-watch alternative. The tradeoff is that the Ultra branding raises expectations it does not always meet. The watch is large, expensive, sometimes awkward to navigate without a physical bezel, and its health metrics are uneven: sleep, stress, blood oxygen, and some heart-rate scenarios drew caveats. It is best understood as a premium Samsung smartwatch with improved fitness credibility, not a full Garmin-style endurance watch or Apple-level dive/sports platform.
Current model
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2
View current model
Product generations
Galaxy Watch Ultra- Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024)This product
- Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
- Galaxy Watch Ultra 2
Feature Scorecards
Summary
56 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.013 (23%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.421 (38%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.415 (27%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.47 (13%)
Pros highlights
-
Battery life was one of the clearest improvements, usually landing around two to three days, though reviewers still noted it falls short of true outdoor-watch endurance.
-
Sleep tracking accuracy was mixed: some reviewers found sleep timing and stages accurate, while others saw gaps, inflated scores, or difficulty distinguishing waking from stillness.
-
Button feedback was mixed: reviewers liked the Quick Button and tactile controls, but several missed a rotating bezel or crown-like navigation.
-
GPS accuracy drew strong agreement: multiple reviewers found routes, lock speed, and distance tracking accurate, with only some urban caveats.
-
Comfort was highly wrist-dependent: several reviewers found it comfortable despite the size, while others said it disrupted sleep or remained hard to forget.
-
Heart rate accuracy was good for many runs and workouts, but several reviews found sport-specific misses, especially cycling, rowing, or rough conditions.
Cons highlights
-
Wellness insights were mixed: Energy Score and tips sometimes felt useful or accurate, while AGEs and some readiness-style metrics were vague or inconsistent.
-
Design reactions were highly polarized: some reviewers loved the bold Ultra look, while others called it derivative, bulky, or aesthetically off.
-
Charging speed was a repeated weakness, with reviewers often reporting around two hours or saying faster charging should be expected at this tier.
-
Value was one of the most contested areas because reviewers liked the watch but repeatedly compared its $649 price against cheaper Galaxy alternatives.
-
Touch interaction was mixed: the touch bezel could be excellent, but wet or sweaty workout use remained a clear limitation.
-
Size options were a common limitation because the watch only comes in one large 47mm case and several reviewers found it bulky.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in voice assistant quality, smartphone notifications, call handling, near average in battery life, health tracking accuracy, below average in charging speed, stress tracking, Bluetooth connectivity.
Comparison summary
56 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher18 (32%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts18 (32%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower20 (36%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| charging speed | 2.3 | 4.1 | -1.9 |
| stress tracking | 1.8 | 3.5 | -1.8 |
| Bluetooth connectivity | 2.0 | 3.7 | -1.7 |
| menu navigation | 2.3 | 3.9 | -1.6 |
| blood oxygen tracking | 2.0 | 3.4 | -1.4 |
| voice assistant quality | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| value for money | 2.7 | 3.8 | -1.2 |
| companion app quality | 2.5 | 3.8 | -1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better blood oxygen tracking
Choose OnePlus Watch 3. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for blood oxygen tracking, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better battery life
Choose Huawei Watch GT 6 Pro. It scores 4.7 vs 4.0 for battery life, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better comfort
Choose Garmin Vivoactive 6. It scores 4.7 vs 3.8 for comfort, with a 3.9 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Similar: GPS accuracy TechRadar was satisfied with GPS accuracy when comparing against Apple’s Ultra 2.
- Better: water sports The Watch Ultra was judged less capable for diving-style water sports than Apple’s Ultra.
- Similar: emergency siren loudness The Ultra’s siren was judged about as loud as Apple’s version.
- Similar: heart rate and GPS accuracy Wareable found its core sports accuracy strong against Garmin’s Epix Pro.
- Similar: GPS accuracy T3 found the Ultra’s GPS accuracy on par with Garmin’s Forerunner 965.
FAQ
How long does the Galaxy Watch Ultra battery last in real use?
Most reviewers reported around two days, with some reaching closer to three days depending on settings and workout use. Several still said it is not long enough for true weekend backcountry use.
Is the GPS accuracy good?
Yes. GPS accuracy was one of the strongest points, with reviewers finding accurate routes, fast locks, and solid distance tracking, though dense city environments could still cause issues.
Is heart rate tracking accurate?
It is generally good for running and many workouts, but not uniformly excellent. Reviewers flagged weaknesses during cycling, rowing, rough surfaces, or specific high-intensity situations.
Do you need a Samsung phone?
A Samsung phone is not required for basic use, but reviewers repeatedly noted that features such as ECG, blood pressure, some AI features, or sleep apnea tools depend on Samsung phone support.
Is it worth paying more than the Galaxy Watch 7?
Reviewers saw the Ultra as worthwhile mainly for people who value the bigger battery, rugged materials, brighter screen, Quick Button, LTE model, and outdoor-focused build. Many said most Android users get better value from the Watch 7.
Can it handle water sports?
It is fine for swimming and held up in surf-style testing, but reviewers warned it is not a true dive watch and is not suitable for high-pressure water sports like scuba diving or jet skiing.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Everyday Legends
- Review score
- 4.1
Article Reviews
techradar.com
- Review score
- 3.9
gizmodo.com
- Review score
- 3.4
androidauthority.com
- Review score
- 3.3
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...
Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money
Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments
Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...
Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy
Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: battery life, value for money
Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features