If you want better movement feel
Choose Crimson Moon. It scores 5.0 vs 1.6 for movement feel, with a 3.4 overall score.
Planted! Review
Content guidance
Cartoon gardeners attack one another with oversized vegetables, bombs, and turrets, causing slapstick knockouts and temporary stuns. Competitive theft and sabotage are central to play.
Official rating
E
Bottom Line
Competitive gardening is funniest with friends who enjoy stealing crops and throwing giant vegetables. Slippery controls, punishing computer opponents, and campaign crashes make solo play a much harder sell.
Friend groups and party gatherings that enjoy playful rivalry, stolen harvests, and cartoon slapstick. Local competition is especially appealing when everyone can react together.
Players buying mainly for a substantial single-player campaign or a deep farming simulation. Those seeking relaxed play or precise platforming are also poorly served by the frantic demands and uneven controls.
Verdict
Planted! is most appealing as a mischievous multiplayer game for friends who enjoy disrupting one another’s plans. Growing giant vegetables, stealing a valuable harvest, and launching produce at rivals can create memorable slapstick, while colorful arenas give the premise real charm. The recommendation becomes much less comfortable beyond that social setting. Several accounts describe slippery movement, awkward throwing, and computer opponents whose precision turns the campaign into a frustrating introduction. Repetition also limits its staying power for some players, although others enjoy the tactical choices and rematches. Technical results vary: repeated PS5 crashes block progress in critical accounts, while an updated Xbox build completes the campaign cleanly. Treat it as a conditional party pick, with substantial reservations for anyone primarily seeking a polished solo adventure.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
66 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.07 (11%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.423 (35%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.411 (17%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.423 (35%)
-
Very negative below 1.52 (3%)
Pros highlights
-
Competitive multiplayer is usually the main attraction, especially when human rivals create unpredictable sabotage. Opinions still range from enthusiastic praise to disappointment with repetition and awkward lobby design.
-
Distinct biomes bring varied hazards, layouts, and delivery goals, making the arenas a recurring strength. Ambitious multi-part stages can also wipe out hard work or punish recovery too severely.
-
Changing crop requests, power-ups, and sabotage give gardening an inventive competitive twist. These systems can also feel repetitive or too crowded to manage comfortably.
-
Bright cartoon styling is one of the most consistent strengths. Exaggerated gardeners and oversized vegetables suit the playful competitive premise.
-
Distinct arenas and power-ups bring welcome variety, with some accounts enthusiastic about the selection. Others find eight biomes insufficient for repeated sessions.
-
The basic loop is intuitive, and some newcomers grasp the controls quickly. Throw timing and demanding early challenges can still create a steep adjustment period.
Cons highlights
-
Human multiplayer can be funny, lively, and mischievous. Aggressive AI, overwhelming chaos, repetitive tasks, and technical trouble make enjoyment much less consistent across the full game.
-
Growing oversized vegetables creates an approachable foundation with useful harvest decisions. Repeated routines and stolen crops can also make tending a garden feel stale or unrewarding.
-
Solo play is a frequent weak point, with aggressive AI, repetition, and uneven challenges limiting enjoyment. Serious crashes or save problems worsen the experience in some tested versions.
-
Sow, grow, and throw is a clear, appealing foundation. Repeated routines and constant interruptions can drain its momentum, particularly in the campaign.
-
Computer opponents repeatedly feel too strong, including at low settings in several accounts. Precise demands, overlapping tasks, and unreliable controls can make the challenge feel punishing rather than fair.
-
The overall recommendation is divided between an entertaining social battler and an unfinished, frustrating package. Controls, campaign difficulty, and technical reliability account for the strongest reservations.
Use Cases
Best for
-
Friends who enjoy teasing rivalry can make stealing and sabotage much funnier than computer matches. That recommendation is tempered by the need to learn the mechanics and tolerate rough edges.
-
Flying giant vegetables and exaggerated cartoon reactions make the game appealing for fans of visual slapstick. The humor depends on embracing the ridiculous garden warfare.
-
Gatherings are a natural setting for its easy-to-grasp premise, sabotage, and shared reactions. The best fit is a group willing to enjoy playful chaos rather than insist on smooth, balanced competition.
Not ideal for
-
Single-player campaign fansCampaign-focused buyers face repeated concerns about thin storytelling, aggressive AI, and uneven challenge design. Some versions also suffer progression-blocking crashes, while even more favorable accounts make solo enjoyment conditional.
-
Precision platforming fansPrecision-platforming fans are likely to be frustrated by oversensitive or slippery movement. Tight obstacle courses demand accuracy the controls do not consistently deliver.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in online stability, dialogue quality, family friendliness, near average in content variety, level design, below average in co-op experience, movement feel, accessibility options.
Comparison summary
65 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher11 (17%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts17 (26%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower37 (57%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| co-op experience | 1.5 | 4.0 | -2.5 |
| movement feel | 1.6 | 3.7 | -2.1 |
| accessibility options | 1.8 | 3.7 | -2.0 |
| solo play quality | 2.1 | 3.9 | -1.8 |
| narrative quality | 1.8 | 3.6 | -1.9 |
| controls responsiveness | 1.9 | 3.7 | -1.8 |
| bug frequency | 1.0 | 2.9 | -1.9 |
| overall quality | 2.5 | 4.2 | -1.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better controls responsiveness
Choose Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2. It scores 5.0 vs 1.9 for controls responsiveness, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better bug frequency
Choose Marathon. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for bug frequency, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better HUD clarity
Choose Valheim. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for HUD clarity, with a 4.5 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Overcooked (2016)
- Better: Managing hectic gameplay Overcooked is presented as successful hectic design, whereas Planted!’s competing demands become overwhelming.
- Compared: Appearance versus competitive gameplay Planted! looks like Overcooked but centers on competition rather than cooperation.
- Similar: Chaotic party-game concept The initial concept recalls Overcooked’s chaotic energy, redirected toward competitive gardening.
Moving Out (2020)
- Similar: Initial party-game resemblance The first impression mixes Moving Out into a competitive gardening party-game concept.
- Alternative: Appeal for chaotic PvP fans Planted! offers some appeal to fans of chaotic Moving Out! competition, with reservations about its execution.
ELDEN RING (2022)
- Compared: Fair challenge versus frustrating controls The reviewer invokes enjoying Elden Ring to distinguish fair difficulty from Planted!’s exhausting imprecision.
FAQ
Is Planted! cooperative or competitive?
The main attraction is competitive gardening for up to four players, including team configurations. Growing crops competes with stealing harvests, blocking deliveries, and attacking rivals.
Can you play locally and online?
The supplied accounts describe local and online multiplayer, split-screen, bots, and cross-play. Human opponents are generally considered more entertaining than computer rivals.
Is the single-player campaign worth buying it for?
It is a weaker reason to buy. Repeated concerns include thin storytelling, extended tutorials, aggressive AI, repetition, and uneven challenges.
Are the controls easy to learn?
Opinions differ: some newcomers join quickly, but several accounts criticize slippery movement, awkward button placement, and hard-to-judge throws. Platforming makes those problems particularly noticeable.
Does it have technical problems?
Some PS5 accounts report crashes that block campaign progression. One Xbox account reports early crashes resolved by updates and a later complete run without a crash, so the tested platform and build matter.
Is there enough variety for repeat play?
Eight biomes, different hazards, power-ups, and medals offer variety. Some enjoy rematches and tactical choices, while others find the arena selection and core routine wear thin.
Can you easily find random online opponents?
One Xbox test found no opponents through Quick Play during its review period. Private games with a friend worked smoothly using a join code.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
xpnnetwork.com
There are plenty of party games that ask you to compete with friends, but Planted! takes a wonderfully ridiculous approach: what if gardening...
- Review score
- 4.4
gamersocialclub.ca
Planted! offers chaotic gardening combat that unfortunately falls flat, with repetitive gameplay loops and frustrating control mechanics
- Review score
- 2.0
gamecritix.co.uk
Planted! turns peaceful gardening into gloriously chaotic competition, blending crop-growing, cheeky sabotage and flying vegetables into a...
- Review score
- 3.9
lifeisxbox.eu
Before I got my hands on Planted!, the game had already sparked my interest. After watching the trailer, I couldn’t help but think back to...
- Review score
- 3.2
pressplaynews.net
Gardening is usually associated with patience, peaceful surroundings and the satisfaction of watching something grow. Planted! takes a rather...
- Review score
- 2.8
Top Video Games to Consider
Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.
Pros: difficulty balance, boss design
Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom
Best for superb combat, inventive builds, and richly voiced characters. Skip it if repeated runs, resource gathering, or visually busy battles outweigh the appeal of steady progress.
Pros: overall quality, combat system
Cons: pacing, grind level
Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...
Pros: town-building system, exploration quality
Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience
Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...
Pros: narrative quality, combat system
Cons: map and navigation design, menu usability