Girls Like Girls

Girls Like Girls Movie Review

Studio: Focus Features
Released: June 19, 2026
Updated: 3 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
187
Review insights
42
Scored features
31
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for tender lead performances, dreamy mid-2000s atmosphere, and an emotionally sincere queer first-love story. Skip it if familiar plotting, underwritten side characters, or slow-burn pacing outweigh representation and mood.

Best for

Best for queer coming-of-age fans, Hayley Kiyoko followers, and viewers drawn to tender first-love stories, expressive performances, and detailed 2006 nostalgia.

Not for

Those seeking an unpredictable plot, fully developed supporting characters, brisk pacing, or a self-contained ending before the credits may find it frustrating.

Verdict

Girls Like Girls succeeds most as an intimate emotional experience rather than a tightly developed romance. Maya da Costa and Myra Molloy bring vulnerability, chemistry, and expressive detail to a familiar first-love story, while Hayley Kiyoko’s warm visual direction and carefully recreated 2006 setting give it a distinctive nostalgic glow. The film’s grief, self-worth, and queer self-acceptance themes often land powerfully. However, the screenplay leaves Sonya and the supporting characters underwritten, relies heavily on montage, and shifts between slow stretches and rushed developments. The abrupt cut to credits is also frustrating unless viewers stay for the more satisfying post-credits conclusion.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    16 (38%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    15 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (26%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.7
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    story quality: 3.7, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    The story is emotionally sincere and easy to connect with, especially through Coley’s grief and self-worth arc. Its main limitation is a familiar, sometimes underdeveloped narrative framework.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The two leads carry the film with expressive, emotionally grounded work, and even harsher reactions usually separate their performances from the script’s weaknesses. Supporting performances draw more mixed responses.
  • 4.4
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    emotional impact: 4.4, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film’s strongest moments make first love, grief, rejection, and self-acceptance feel immediate and raw. Even mixed reactions often acknowledge that the central emotions land.
  • 4.1
    12 reviews low consensus
    directing quality: 4.1, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Hayley Kiyoko shows a strong eye for intimacy, mood, and emotional detail in her feature debut. Reactions split over whether the music-video sensibility fully sustains a feature-length narrative.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.6, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The leads’ chemistry is usually the film’s strongest pull, especially in quiet looks, touches, and private moments. A minority found the spark too muted to justify the relationship’s pain.
  • 3.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The final resolution is divisive because the main cut to black can feel abrupt, while the post-credits scene supplies the romantic closure many viewers wanted. Staying through the credits materially improves the payoff.

Cons highlights

  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The dialogue ranges from natural, awkward teenage speech to lines described as stiff, cringey, or overly YA-styled. The quiet visual storytelling often works better than the spoken exchanges.
  • 3.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The deliberate, slow-burn rhythm works for viewers who enjoy lingering mood and emotional detail. Others find the montages, dead air, and rushed late developments an uneven combination.
  • 3.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 3.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Coley receives a clear grief-and-self-acceptance arc, while Sonya and several side characters often feel less fully explored. The imbalance leaves parts of the relationship emotionally convincing but narratively underwritten.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 3.1, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The screenplay has genuine sensitivity and several strong emotional ideas, but it often relies on familiar structure, thin side characters, and abbreviated development.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews low consensus
    editing quality: 3.1, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The editing can effectively capture glances, memory, and emotional shifts, but rapid cuts and montage-heavy passages sometimes rush key developments or blur the passage of time.
  • 2.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 2.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting cast has warm individual moments, but thinly written roles limit their impact and leave the film heavily dependent on the leads.

Cast & Creators

  • Coley
    4.8
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Maya da Costa: 4.8, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Maya da Costa is the film’s emotional anchor, conveying grief, longing, anger, and growing confidence with unusually expressive restraint. Her performance is the most consistently praised element.
  • Sonya
    4.3
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Myra Molloy: 4.3, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Myra Molloy gives Sonya charm, volatility, and flashes of fear beneath her confident façade. Her work is widely admired, though some reactions blame the writing for leaving Sonya’s shifts insufficiently explained.
  • Director
    4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Hayley Kiyoko: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Hayley Kiyoko’s direction is strongest in intimate visual details, mood, and the quiet physical language of first love. Her feature debut shows clear sensitivity even where the screenplay and pacing divide opinion.
  • Curtis
    3.9
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Zach Braff: 3.9, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Zach Braff’s subdued father performance is generally warm and touching, especially in the later grief scenes. A smaller group found him miscast or unable to supply the role’s full emotional range.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in plot clarity, sexual content level, violence level, near average in directing quality, cinematography, below average in supporting cast performance, suspense, visual style.

Comparison summary

42 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    22 (52%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    16 (38%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    4 (10%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
plot clarity 5.0 2.8 +2.2
sexual content level 5.0 2.8 +2.2
violence level 5.0 3.1 +1.9
tonal consistency 5.0 3.2 +1.8
age appropriateness 4.5 2.7 +1.8
supporting cast performance 2.5 4.1 -1.6
rewatch value 5.0 3.5 +1.5
cultural representation 4.8 3.5 +1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better supporting cast performance

Choose The Invite. It scores 4.9 vs 2.5 for supporting cast performance, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better editing quality

Choose Leviticus. It scores 4.8 vs 3.1 for editing quality, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better plot originality

Choose Bouchra. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for plot originality, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better dialogue quality

Choose The Weight. It scores 4.8 vs 2.6 for dialogue quality, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Worse: overall coming-of-age execution The reviewer preferred this film when watching both queer coming-of-age stories together.

CODA

  • Similar: melodramatic structure and pacing The charming opening and heavier back-half melodrama are compared with CODA.

Desert Hearts

  • Similar: queer romance structure Its simple friendship-to-love structure is compared with a landmark queer romance.

FAQ

Is Girls Like Girls mainly a romance?

It is a queer first-love story, but Coley’s grief, self-worth, family wounds, and growing independence are just as central as whether the relationship succeeds.

Are the lead performances good?

Yes. Maya da Costa is the most consistently praised element, while Myra Molloy is widely admired for balancing Sonya’s confidence, volatility, and fear.

Is the movie faithful to the song, video, and novel?

It keeps the original visual and emotional DNA, includes many fan callbacks, and condenses or changes parts of the novel. The removal of the music video’s assault is generally viewed as an improvement.

Does the film feel slow?

The pacing is deliberately patient and mood-driven. Some find that approach intimate and absorbing, while others criticize dead air, repeated montages, and rushed transitions late in the story.

Should viewers stay through the credits?

Yes. The post-credits scene provides the more romantic and satisfying conclusion that several reactions felt was missing from the initial cut to black.

Who is the film most likely to connect with?

It is most likely to resonate with sapphic audiences, nostalgic millennials, younger queer viewers, and anyone who values emotional authenticity over plot novelty.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Movies to Consider

#1 You Can See Everything
4.7

Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.

Pros: originality, humor

#2 Chronovisor
4.7

Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.

Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography

Cons: audience appeal

#3 Remake
4.6

Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.

Pros: emotional impact, theme depth

#4 Halloween
4.6

Best for patient suspense, an unforgettable score, and an unsettling masked killer. Skip it for very young children or if you want to avoid intense scares; its restrained kills also...

Pros: directing quality, score quality

Cons: message quality