Forgotten Island

Forgotten Island Feature Scores

Explore all 51 feature scores for Forgotten Island, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    28 (55%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    13 (25%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    39 reviews strong consensus
    animation quality: 4.9, 39 reviews, strong consensus
    Animation is the clearest consensus strength, blending polished 3D work with anime, manga, and 2D flourishes in a way that feels unusually inventive and alive.
  • 4.9
    29 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 4.9, 29 reviews, strong consensus
    Filipino culture is woven into the setting, language, food, music, family life, and mythology rather than used as decoration, making the film feel specific and welcoming at the same time.
  • 4.8
    26 reviews strong consensus
    friendship portrayal: 4.8, 26 reviews, strong consensus
    The central friendship is the film’s emotional anchor: affectionate, messy, believable, and strong enough to carry a story about separation, memory, and growing into different lives.
  • 4.8
    32 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.8, 32 reviews, strong consensus
    Its neon palette, mixed-media flourishes, anime influences, and constantly shifting visual language are among its biggest attractions, even if the intensity occasionally becomes sensory overload.
  • 4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    The voice ensemble is a major strength, with energetic, expressive performances that keep the friendship and comedy convincing even when the plot gets busy.
  • 4.9
    12 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.9, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The film goes beyond a simple friendship lesson to explore memory, identity, separation, grief, cultural roots, and the painful but survivable changes that come with growing up.
  • 4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Even with familiar Hangover- and portal-fantasy ingredients, the Filipino mythology, memory premise, visual language, and friendship focus make the finished movie feel unusually distinctive.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    chemistry between characters: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Jo and Raissa feel like lifelong friends rather than a scripted pairing, with warm, lived-in chemistry that gives their separation real emotional weight.
  • 4.4
    26 reviews moderate consensus
    emotional impact: 4.4, 26 reviews, moderate consensus
    For many, the friendship-and-memory story builds to a moving or even devastating payoff, though a smaller group feels the frantic structure sometimes blunts that emotional force.
  • 4.4
    19 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 4.4, 19 reviews, low consensus
    The movie is widely seen as a fun, energetic theatrical ride, especially for viewers who enjoy rapid-fire jokes and visual invention; the same intensity can exhaust others.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    rewatch value: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The dense visual details, fast jokes, and emotional payoff make repeat viewing especially appealing to those who connect with its style.
  • 4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting voices provide strong comic color, with several side characters becoming scene-stealers even when their narrative roles are thin.
  • 4.2
    28 reviews low consensus
    humor: 4.2, 28 reviews, low consensus
    The comedy is usually a hit, ranging from slapstick and absurd creature jokes to rapid visual gags, though some find the juvenile or hyperactive material grating.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews low consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.3, 18 reviews, low consensus
    The soundtrack is energetic and memorable, mixing Filipino music with ’80s and ’90s pop, though the sheer number of needle drops can sometimes feel overdone.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    message quality: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Its message about accepting change without erasing the people and memories that shaped you comes through clearly and gives the adventure substance beyond the quest mechanics.
  • 4.1
    29 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 4.1, 29 reviews, low consensus
    The friendship-and-memory core earns substantial praise for heart and sincerity, but the story loses some clarity and force when too many creatures, detours, and ideas compete for attention.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    critic appeal: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The overall critical response in this set is very enthusiastic, with multiple critics placing it among the year’s strongest animated films despite recurring pacing complaints.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    audience appeal: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Its mix of friendship, comedy, folklore, and vivid animation reaches well beyond small children, with particular appeal for preteens, teens, animation fans, and Filipino audiences.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    world-building: 4.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Nakali is imaginative and culturally rich, with memorable creatures and environments, though several responses wish the film slowed down enough to explore that world more deeply.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    score quality: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The original score is warmly received for supporting both emotion and cultural identity, including the use of Filipino and Indigenous musical textures.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    action sequences: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The action is fast, kinetic, and visually inventive, giving the island adventure a constant sense of movement without losing its comic energy.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The two lead voices are consistently praised for making Jo and Raissa likable, distinct, and emotionally credible through both comedy and conflict.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Manila and Nakali are both packed with texture, color, and culturally specific detail, with environments that feel designed rather than merely filled.
  • 4.0
    13 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 4.0, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Most reactions find the finale moving and satisfying, but there is real disagreement over whether its resolution is earned, with some calling the ending rushed or contrived.
  • 4.0
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    family friendliness: 4.0, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    There is plenty for families to enjoy, but this is a harder-edged PG than the brightest DreamWorks fare, with frightening monsters, rude humor, mild language, and darker themes.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    directing quality: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The direction is ambitious and confident in its visual storytelling, though one view finds the emotional material less fully developed than the stylistic fireworks.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    CGI quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The CGI is a showcase, with richly stylized character work and imagery that stands out even beside recent high-end animated releases.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    drama quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The friendship drama lands hard when the movie focuses on the fear of growing apart, giving the fantasy stakes a surprisingly tender emotional center.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    genre satisfaction: 5.0, 1 review
    As a big-screen animated adventure, it delivers the color, action, emotion, humor, and spectacle expected from the format at a very high level.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    realism: 5.0, 1 review
    Despite the supernatural setting, the fear of friends growing apart gives the central conflict a grounded emotional reality.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    romance quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The film’s choice to keep the core relationship centered on friendship rather than forcing in romance is treated as a refreshing creative strength.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    sexual content level: 5.0, 1 review
    The central bond stays focused on platonic friendship rather than romance, a restraint specifically welcomed by a family-focused response.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    special effects quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The supernatural animation and creature effects—especially Manang’s movement and transformations—are presented as technically impressive and visually memorable.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    suspense: 5.0, 1 review
    The race to preserve the girls’ memories and escape the island creates real tension, particularly once the darker threat closes in.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot originality: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The broad friendship-and-portal framework is familiar, but the memory-loss structure and cultural setting give the plot enough personality to keep it from feeling generic.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    cinematography: 4.5, 1 review
    Low-angle and wide compositions help the animated world feel larger and more cinematic, adding scale to both the island and its creatures.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    editing quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Music-synchronized cuts and music-video-like passages give the film a rhythmic editing style that suits its restless, mixtape-like energy.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    faithfulness to source material: 4.5, 1 review
    The film reshapes Filipino folklore for its own story while still feeling rooted in recognizable classic traditions rather than stripping them of their darker identity.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dialogue quality: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The script can be genuinely funny and warm, though repeated catchphrases and a few lines land awkwardly enough to keep the dialogue from being uniformly strong.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    violence level: 4.0, 1 review
    The harder PG violence and frightening action give the movie welcome edge for some older viewers, but they make it less comfortable for the youngest audience.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sound design: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The soundscape can add real theatrical punch, but one screening found music and effects occasionally loud enough to obscure dialogue.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    marketing accuracy: 2.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Several reactions argue the trailers undersell the finished film, while a few also push back on superlative marketing claims; overall, the campaign does not fully capture the movie’s strengths.
  • 2.5
    29 reviews moderate consensus
    pacing: 2.5, 29 reviews, moderate consensus
    Pacing is the most repeated weakness: the movie moves at breakneck speed, piles on characters and jokes, and often leaves little breathing room even when that energy is exciting.
  • 2.6
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    plot clarity: 2.6, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The missing-memory structure is clever but can become difficult to follow as side quests, lore, and rapid exposition accumulate, especially through the middle.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    runtime: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    At roughly two hours, the film can feel longer than its breathless pace suggests, with some wishing the crowded middle had been trimmed.
  • 2.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    character development: 2.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Jo and Raissa are generally well realized, but many side characters get less room to grow; the crowded creature roster often feels more colorful than fully developed.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    language level: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Language is relatively mild by mainstream standards, but one family-focused response finds even that level unnecessary and distracting.
  • 2.9
    6 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 2.9, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The blend of horror, slapstick, sentiment, and manic comedy is bold but uneven; some enjoy the contrast while others find the shifts jarring or exhausting.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    age appropriateness: 3.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The PG label comes with real caveats: older kids and teens are a better fit than very young or sensitive viewers because the villain and darker imagery can be intense.
  • 3.2
    14 reviews low consensus
    scares: 3.2, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Manang and the darker folklore imagery can be genuinely scary, including body-separation imagery and intense chases; some admire that edge while others warn it may overwhelm younger kids.
  • 3.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    screenplay quality: 3.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The screenplay is imaginative and often funny, but reactions split over its structure: the emotional ideas are strong while the crowded plotting and rushed connective tissue can weaken them.

Cast & Creators

  • Jo
    4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    H.E.R.: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    H.E.R. gives Jo a playful, unruly energy while still making her fear of being left behind feel vulnerable and sincere.
  • Raww
    4.4
    14 reviews low consensus
    Dave Franco: 4.4, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Dave Franco’s Raww is one of the most discussed performances: usually praised for comic timing, energy, and vulnerability, though a few find the voice or character grating.
  • Batiba
    4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Jenny Slate: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Jenny Slate gives Batiba a memorable mix of sweetness, menace, and personality, with several responses highlighting her as a strong supporting voice.
  • Mermahn
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Kevin McCann: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Kevin McCann’s vain Mermahn is a consistent comic standout, with his smug delivery and self-absorbed performance repeatedly earning scene-stealing praise.
  • Director/Writer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Januel Mercado: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Januel Mercado’s direction is praised for marrying Filipino cultural specificity with energetic visual storytelling and a heartfelt friendship story.
  • Director/Writer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Joel Crawford: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Joel Crawford’s direction is praised for combining emotional sincerity with bold animated invention, even when the pace becomes crowded.
  • Raissa
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Liza Soberano: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Liza Soberano makes Raissa warm, driven, and believable opposite Jo, helping the lifelong friendship feel lived-in rather than manufactured.
  • Bungi
    4.3
    5 reviews low consensus
    Manny Jacinto: 4.3, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Manny Jacinto’s Bungi is often singled out as adorable or scene-stealing comic color, though one response finds the giant baby demon outright annoying.
  • Composer
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Nathan Matthew David: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Nathan Matthew David’s score is warmly praised for its beauty and for supporting the film’s Filipino folkloric identity.
  • Lola
    4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Dolly de Leon: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Dolly de Leon brings warmth and personality to Lola, with her performance helping ground Jo’s emotional history and the film’s abundant heart.
  • Manananggal
    3.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    Lea Salonga: 3.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Lea Salonga gives Manang a convincingly menacing presence, but reactions are mixed because some feel the film severely underuses her.
  • King Truffle Wuffle
    4.5
    1 review
    Ronny Chieng: 4.5, 1 review
    Ronny Chieng contributes welcome comedic color as King Truffle Wuffle, helping the crowded creature ensemble stay lively.