Forgotten Island Movie Review

Released: September 25, 2026
Updated: 1 week ago
4.2
Overall review score
485
Review insights
51
Scored features
66
Expert reviews
Content guidance
Scorata recommended age 8+

Best suited to ages 8+ because Manang’s body-splitting design, intense chases, memory-stealing horror, mild language, rude humor, and brief tobacco imagery may frighten younger children.

Official rating PG

Bottom Line

Choose it for dazzling animation, Filipino folklore, big laughs, and a heartfelt friendship story. Skip it if hyperactive pacing, crowded side characters, or genuinely scary PG imagery are likely to overwhelm you or younger kids.

Best for

Best for older kids, teens, families comfortable with a harder PG, animation fans, and viewers drawn to Filipino folklore, fast comedy, and emotionally sincere friendship stories.

Not for

Less suited to very young or sensitive children and to viewers who dislike hyperactive pacing, crowded plots, rapid visual changes, or frequent pop-culture jokes.

Verdict

Forgotten Island is at its best when its dazzling mixed-media animation and Filipino folklore serve Jo and Raissa’s deeply felt friendship. The voice cast, cultural detail, humor, and memory theme give the adventure warmth and a distinctive identity, and the final stretch lands emotionally for many viewers. The tradeoff is density: characters, side quests, jokes, music cues, and visual ideas arrive so quickly that the middle can feel cluttered, hard to follow, or exhausting. Its PG rating also carries real bite, with Manang’s frightening design and chases likely too intense for some younger children. For viewers comfortable with that pace and edge, the creativity and heart outweigh the messiness.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    28 (55%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    13 (25%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

View all 41 pros
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    rewatch value: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The dense visual details, fast jokes, and emotional payoff make repeat viewing especially appealing to those who connect with its style.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    critic appeal: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The overall critical response in this set is very enthusiastic, with multiple critics placing it among the year’s strongest animated films despite recurring pacing complaints.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The two lead voices are consistently praised for making Jo and Raissa likable, distinct, and emotionally credible through both comedy and conflict.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Manila and Nakali are both packed with texture, color, and culturally specific detail, with environments that feel designed rather than merely filled.
  • 4.9
    39 reviews strong consensus
    animation quality: 4.9, 39 reviews, strong consensus
    Animation is the clearest consensus strength, blending polished 3D work with anime, manga, and 2D flourishes in a way that feels unusually inventive and alive.
  • 4.9
    29 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 4.9, 29 reviews, strong consensus
    Filipino culture is woven into the setting, language, food, music, family life, and mythology rather than used as decoration, making the film feel specific and welcoming at the same time.

Cons highlights

View all 10 cons
  • 2.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    marketing accuracy: 2.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Several reactions argue the trailers undersell the finished film, while a few also push back on superlative marketing claims; overall, the campaign does not fully capture the movie’s strengths.
  • 2.5
    29 reviews moderate consensus
    pacing: 2.5, 29 reviews, moderate consensus
    Pacing is the most repeated weakness: the movie moves at breakneck speed, piles on characters and jokes, and often leaves little breathing room even when that energy is exciting.
  • 2.6
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    plot clarity: 2.6, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The missing-memory structure is clever but can become difficult to follow as side quests, lore, and rapid exposition accumulate, especially through the middle.
  • 2.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    character development: 2.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Jo and Raissa are generally well realized, but many side characters get less room to grow; the crowded creature roster often feels more colorful than fully developed.
  • 2.9
    6 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 2.9, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The blend of horror, slapstick, sentiment, and manic comedy is bold but uneven; some enjoy the contrast while others find the shifts jarring or exhausting.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    age appropriateness: 3.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The PG label comes with real caveats: older kids and teens are a better fit than very young or sensitive viewers because the villain and darker imagery can be intense.

Cast & Creators

  • Jo
    4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    H.E.R.: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    H.E.R. gives Jo a playful, unruly energy while still making her fear of being left behind feel vulnerable and sincere.
  • Raww
    4.4
    14 reviews low consensus
    Dave Franco: 4.4, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Dave Franco’s Raww is one of the most discussed performances: usually praised for comic timing, energy, and vulnerability, though a few find the voice or character grating.
  • Batiba
    4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Jenny Slate: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Jenny Slate gives Batiba a memorable mix of sweetness, menace, and personality, with several responses highlighting her as a strong supporting voice.
  • Mermahn
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Kevin McCann: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Kevin McCann’s vain Mermahn is a consistent comic standout, with his smug delivery and self-absorbed performance repeatedly earning scene-stealing praise.
  • Director/Writer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Januel Mercado: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Januel Mercado’s direction is praised for marrying Filipino cultural specificity with energetic visual storytelling and a heartfelt friendship story.
  • Director/Writer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Joel Crawford: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Joel Crawford’s direction is praised for combining emotional sincerity with bold animated invention, even when the pace becomes crowded.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in CGI quality, sexual content level, originality, near average in soundtrack quality, character development, below average in scares, pacing, marketing accuracy.

Comparison summary

51 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    37 (73%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (18%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    5 (10%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
CGI quality 5.0 2.7 +2.3
sexual content level 5.0 2.9 +2.1
originality 4.9 3.4 +1.6
cultural representation 4.9 3.6 +1.3
animation quality 4.9 3.7 +1.3
family friendliness 4.0 2.5 +1.5
romance quality 5.0 3.3 +1.7
rewatch value 5.0 3.5 +1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better age appropriateness

Choose Project Hail Mary. It scores 4.8 vs 3.1 for age appropriateness, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better humor

Choose Crime 101. It scores 4.8 vs 4.2 for humor, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better pacing

Choose The Furious. It scores 4.7 vs 2.5 for pacing, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

KPop Demon Hunters

  • Similar: cultural representation Its Filipino cultural focus is compared with how KPop Demon Hunters foregrounded Korean culture.

Puss in Boots: The Last Wish

  • Similar: animation style The animation is described as strongly reminiscent of the directors’ earlier stylized DreamWorks film.

Spirited Away

  • Similar: memory, identity, and folklore The memory-and-identity premise is compared with Spirited Away, while the Filipino identity keeps this film distinct.

FAQ

Is Forgotten Island appropriate for young children?

It is rated PG, but the darker monster imagery and intense chases make it a better fit for roughly age 8 and up, depending on sensitivity.

Is Forgotten Island scary?

Yes. Manang is repeatedly described as genuinely frightening, with a body that separates at the waist, menacing chases, and other creepy folklore imagery.

What is the movie’s biggest strength?

The strongest consensus is its inventive animation, followed closely by the believable friendship between Jo and Raissa and the depth of its Filipino cultural detail.

Do you need to know Filipino folklore to follow it?

No. The story provides enough context for newcomers, although the fast pace and large number of creatures can make some lore harder to absorb.

Is the movie funny?

Usually, yes. Many responses praise the absurd creature comedy and rapid visual gags, though some find the juvenile or nonstop humor tiring.

Does the ending work?

For many viewers the finale is moving and satisfying, but others feel the resolution is rushed, overly neat, or not fully earned.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

dcfilmdom.com

Forgotten Island is a megaton blast of color, vibrancy, and spectacle, and a celebration of Filipino culture and folklore like I've never...

Review score
4.9

Top Movies to Consider

#1 Disneyland Handcrafted
4.8

Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...

Pros: plot clarity, realism

Cons: plot originality, runtime

#2 Barbara Forever
4.8

Best for an intimate, inventive archival portrait with strong emotional and cultural impact. Skip it if substantial nudity or an occasionally wandering biographical structure will frustrate you.

Pros: chemistry between characters, emotional impact

Cons: runtime, plot clarity

#3 Chronovisor
4.8

Best for an audacious, text-driven conspiracy thriller with gorgeous 16mm atmosphere and mounting dread. Skip it if long stretches of reading, deliberate repetition, and an intentionally austere narrative sound more...

Pros: story quality, plot clarity

Cons: chemistry between characters, sound design

#4 Halloween
4.8

Best for slow-burn suspense, iconic synth music, and shadow-soaked filmmaking that still feels influential. Skip it if you need fast pacing, polished sound, consistently natural dialogue, or modern gore-heavy kills.

Pros: chemistry between characters, directing quality

Cons: sound design, dialogue quality